--- Comment #5 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-04-28 14:53
---
O, now I see my stupidity, as for some reason ulimit -s is set to a pathetic
8192k. I am sorry to have troubled you folks with this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39945
--- Comment #2 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-04-28 14:32
---
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc --with-languages=c,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20080424 (experimental) (GCC
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-04-28 14:30
---
Created an attachment (id=17774)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17774&action=view)
sample source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39945
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
GCC host triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
GCC target
--- Comment #12 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-04-02 19:49
---
It's a pleasure, and also amazing to see you folks work so quickly on this. The
context for the report is our large code (http://www.molpro.net) which
hopefully now for the first time will build correctly
--- Comment #3 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-03-31 10:12
---
My apologies that I did not do some reduction, which of course I could have
easily done. I was merely following the guidelines at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html which says lots of things, but does not mention
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-03-31 08:24
---
Created an attachment (id=17567)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17567&action=view)
source and includes that demonstrate the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39595
dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
GCC host triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
GCC target triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39595
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2009-03-31 08:13
---
Created an attachment (id=17566)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17566&action=view)
tarball containing source file and its includes
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39594
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1
GCC host triplet: i386-apple-
--- Comment #22 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2008-04-25 08:10
---
Yes, this was the silver bullet. With
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/opt/gcc
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20080424 (experimental) (GCC
--- Comment #19 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2008-04-24 09:34
---
As the originator of this report, I just wanted to add a context comment in
case it is helpful. This construction (common declared both in the module and
in subroutines (contained or external)) is horrible
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2008-04-09 17:24
---
Created an attachment (id=15458)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15458&action=view)
Fortran source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35892
NFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC host triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
GCC target triplet: i386-apple-darwin9.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35892
--- Comment #4 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-05-31 11:58
---
The compiler was downloaded from the link in http://hpc.sourceforge.net/ .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32155
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-05-30 13:42
---
Created an attachment (id=13633)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13633&action=view)
Failing program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32155
ram that
manipulates strings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardif
--- Comment #3 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-04-27 16:13
---
I don't agree with this analysis, as ll is certainly defined in char3.f as
attached -
ll=len(s)
Please try with the program exactly as supplied!
Yes, you are right, this function is the same as len_trim bu
--- Comment #1 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-04-27 10:34
---
Created an attachment (id=13455)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13455&action=view)
failing program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31725
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.9.1
GCC host triplet: i38
--- Comment #5 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-04-25 22:46
---
I guess I walk away from you guys at this point. You need to think carefully
about the fortran standard, which does not define any abi whatsoever
(unfortunately). The fortran programmer is not supposed to think
--- Comment #2 from KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk 2007-04-25 16:47
---
I don't understand your response, or the assumptions that might be behind it.
The program is standard fortran that compiles without warning, and I cannot see
why I would not want doubles aligned at 64 bi
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: KnowlesPJ at Cardiff dot ac dot uk
GCC build triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.9.1
GCC host triplet: i386-apple-darwin8.9.1
GCC target triplet: i386-apple
23 matches
Mail list logo
