[Bug target/110011] -mfull-toc (-mfp-in-toc) yields incorrect _Float128 constants on power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110011 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/95987] Another ice during GIMPLE pass: slp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95987 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-06-30

[Bug libstdc++/95990] New: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95990 Bug ID: 95990 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: RESOLVED Severity:

[Bug target/70053] Returning a struct of _Decimal128 values generates extraneous stores and loads

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70053 Jiu Fu Guo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/95991] New: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95991 Bug ID: 95991 Summary: Segmentation fault compiling with static libraries and using jthread::request_stop Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: RESOLVED Severity:

[Bug preprocessor/61638] "warning: multi-line comment" unclear and has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638 --- Comment #12 from Jack Adrian Zappa --- Is it possible that 2. If a line comment end in an \ but the next line is a comment, then do the same thing as is done for a multi-line comment, ignore it as not an issue. Could be done.

[Bug c++/99479] [modules] ICE Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99479 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95637] Read-only data assigned to `.sdata' rather than `.rodata'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95637 --- Comment #6 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- Thanks WRT Ada clarification. Otherwise I don't think there's anything stopping a language definition from requiring an attempt to modify read-only data to be trapped as an exceptional condition,

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #8 from Frédéric Buclin --- Created attachment 48139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48139=edit Fix taint issue in Template/Provider.pm I wrote a trivial patch to fix the taint issue reported in

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Where? You are right. These fields are missing.

[Bug web/94351] bugzilla search is not as useful as before

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94351 --- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin --- You don't have to use the custom search part. The other fields are still there, as before.

[Bug web/94349] Bugzilla user preferences are blank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94349 --- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin --- Hum, what happened recently, server side? The source code didn't change for months (or if it changed, someone else did).

[Bug web/93185] Support git commits as a link in bugzilla entries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93185 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/93185] Support git commits as a link in bugzilla entries

|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |LpSolit at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > r([0-9]{1,6}) to http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision=\1 > (what we have already, should be https? and perhaps we'll switch to some > redirecto

[Bug web/93185] Support git commits as a link in bugzilla entries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93185 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/89964] Remove the "First, you must pick a product on which to enter a bug:" page

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89964 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/90127] Disable bugzilla [[wiki_links]] and don't confuse r12 register names with r12345 svn revisions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90127 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/90127] Disable bugzilla [[wiki_links]] and don't confuse r12 register names with r12345 svn revisions

||2019-04-17 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |LpSolit at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > Either we should pick another syntax for w

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/88108] Remove misleading "raw unified" link from Bugzilla patch viewer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88108 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/88108] Remove misleading "raw unified" link from Bugzilla patch viewer

||2018-12-29 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |LpSolit at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45304|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 Frédéric Buclin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 --- Comment #12 from Frédéric Buclin --- Created attachment 45304 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45304=edit patch, v1 Patch applied.

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 --- Comment #11 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > Frédéric, any idea why your comment above caused Bugzilla to send the next > ten emails with your name on? They were old emails stuck in the queue, as you

[Bug other/87549] Optimize fetch atomics with unused results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87549 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/87640] [9 regression] internal compiler error: in check, at tree-vrp.c:155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iii at linux dot ibm.com --- Comment

[Bug c++/85471] closing a "thread" in "C++" using "pthread_exit(NULL)" creates a "SIGABRT"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85471 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Andreas Otto from comment #4) > change my C++ wrapper from "embedded data" (large amount of data) to just an > embedded pointer (only 8byte pointer in the C++ class) > > → the error is still

[Bug target/87471] AVX512F gather in Intel syntax is incompatible with binutils 2.32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87471 --- Comment #1 from jbeulich at novell dot com --- Yeah, and as validly noted in bug 79299 comment 2, it shouldn't have been gcc to get fixed back then, but gas. Without having looked, I assume gcc emitted size specifiers in line with the AVX

[Bug target/85095] [6/7 Regression] worse code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85095 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/85172] internal compiler error: unexpected expression '' of kind asm_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85172 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84999] [7 Regression] ICE in make_vector_type, at tree.c:9561

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84999 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84980] [concepts] ICE with missing typename in concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84980 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84961] [7 Regression] ICE error: SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84961 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/84853] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (expand_shift_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84853 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83403] Missed register promotion opportunities in loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug web/86315] Bugzilla: add "cc count" and "duplicate count" columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315 --- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Is there please any update? I can work on it early next week. Ping me if I don't do it by the end of next week.