Re: [Bug ada/34173] New: [4.3 regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/release_unc_maxalign.adb execution test

2007-12-07 Thread Olivier Hainque
Hello, andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de wrote: gnat.dg/release_unc_maxalign.adb execution test fails for me since 20.11.2007. At 19.11.2007 it whas worked. This should be fixed now. Analysis at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-12/msg00318.html Thanks again for opening the PR.

Re: [Bug ada/34173] New: [4.3 regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/release_unc_maxalign.adb execution test

2007-11-23 Thread Olivier Hainque
andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de wrote: gnat.dg/release_unc_maxalign.adb execution test fails for me since 20.11.2007. At 19.11.2007 it whas worked. Thanks for opening the PR. We have identified what is causing this and are qualifying a candidate fix. This is an old bug actually, showing up on

Re: [Bug ada/24533] FAIL: a85013b: *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x00062a00 ***

2006-01-03 Thread Olivier Hainque
charlet at adacore dot com wrote: Hmm, so that means that 16 is bigger than Standard'Maximum_Alignment... Yes, the latter is 8, computed from GCC's BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT. Is it really the case that the C headers mandate an alignment of 16 for this type which is not guaranteed by malloc ? IIUC,