[Bug c/48070] Target application fails when compiled with optimizations

2011-03-11 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48070 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48070] Target application fails when compiled with optimizations

2011-03-11 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48070 --- Comment #2 from Brad 2011-03-11 09:40:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Even at -O0, valgrind complains about using uninitialised value: > (tested with gcc 4.4.5, x86_64-linux) This is likely an unintelligent question, but does that outp

[Bug c/48070] Application fails assertion when compiled with optimizations

2011-03-11 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48070 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug c/48070] New: Application fails assertion when compiled with optimizations

2011-03-11 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48070 Summary: Application fails assertion when compiled with optimizations Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

2010-11-10 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 --- Comment #2 from Brad 2010-11-11 02:53:43 UTC --- Also, whoops, the remove code is broken. It doesn't increment it at the end of the while loop. This bug has no impact on the problem I was encountering. Sorry for the swarm of posts, it's re

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

2010-11-10 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|major

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

2010-11-10 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 --- Comment #1 from Brad 2010-11-11 02:37:56 UTC --- I forgot to mention one thing. The code that seems to acting suspisciously is this bit: toDo.erase( *out ); //Putting this code here instead of the end breaks this code. std::map >::const_i

[Bug libstdc++/46424] Iterators being improperly invalidated

2010-11-10 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Brad changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |critical

[Bug libstdc++/46424] New: Iterators being improperly invalidated

2010-11-10 Thread Shadow7789 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424 Summary: Iterators being improperly invalidated Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig.