[Bug c++/104712] -fkeep-inline-functions causing link errors (debian but not godbolt?)

2022-02-28 Thread ajrh at ajrh dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712 ajrh at ajrh dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ajrh at ajrh dot net --- Comment

[Bug c++/104712] -fkeep-inline-functions causing link errors (debian but not godbolt?)

2022-02-27 Thread ajrh at ajrh dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104712 --- Comment #2 from ajrh at ajrh dot net --- Oh drat, reduced test cases are maddening... it's an inline static const in my original. I'll try to reduce something again.

[Bug c++/104712] New: -fkeep-inline-functions causing link errors (debian but not godbolt?)

2022-02-27 Thread ajrh at ajrh dot net via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: ajrh at ajrh dot net Target Milestone: --- For use with gcov, I'm trying to use the --keep-inline-functions flag, as suggested in the GCC manual, but it's causing a lot of link

[Bug c++/48969] New: ICE with -std=c++0x

2011-05-11 Thread ajrh at ajrh dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969 Summary: ICE with -std=c++0x Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug inline-asm/38680] New: -masm= option might usefully define a preprocessor macro?

2008-12-30 Thread ajrh at ajrh dot net
a preprocessor macro? Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: inline-asm AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ajrh at ajrh dot net GCC