--- Comment #10 from alexey at hyperroll dot com 2006-09-18 05:48 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> We should never warn on multiply because it is just too crazy to. This is
> what
> debugging is about, debug your program for mistakes like this.
The citation may be used to
--- Comment #7 from alexey at hyperroll dot com 2006-03-13 21:49 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
So, who is actually going to fix the issue?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24542
--- Comment #5 from alexey at hyperroll dot com 2005-10-26 17:12 ---
Sir, it's my first report here, and I see the code first time. I hope that both
comments #3 and #4 are not for me. Or am I mistaken?
Otherwise, what document (preferably, short) should I read to understan
--- Comment #2 from alexey at hyperroll dot com 2005-10-26 15:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=10062)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10062&action=view)
example of code to warn, proposed partial patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24542
--- Comment #1 from alexey at hyperroll dot com 2005-10-26 15:01 ---
I'm not familiar with the parse tree, so I could do only a partial patch
(assignment, not initialization). The example file, original and patched source
files archived and attached.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: alexey at hyperroll dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24542
