https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71275
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat May 28 00:22:56 2016
New Revision: 236843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236843=gcc=rev
Log:
ira.c bb_loop_depth again
Follow the same practice as other places in ira.c, where
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71275
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71275
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu May 26 17:38:36 2016
New Revision: 236789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236789=gcc=rev
Log:
ira.c bb_loop_depth
PR rtl-optimization/71275
* ira.c (ira): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71275
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gcc dot gnu.org, |
|amodra at gmail
||2016-05-26
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70947
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70947
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon May 16 04:51:21 2016
New Revision: 236264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236264=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] Stop regrename twiddling with split-stack prologue
PR target/70947
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70947
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon May 9 23:12:20 2016
New Revision: 236052
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236052=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] Stop regrename twiddling with split-stack prologue
PR target/70947
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|amodra at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon May 9 12:35:25 2016
New Revision: 236033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236033=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] Fragile testcase breaks with -frename-registers
PR testsuite/70826
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu May 5 00:07:27 2016
New Revision: 235914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235914=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] TARGET_RELOCATABLE
For ABI_V4, -mrelocatable and -fPIC both generate
||2016-05-04
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Instructions around a __morestack call typically have r0, used to save and
restore lr, replaced with other regs by regrename. This trashes the current
function parameter and return regs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70866
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70866
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue May 3 23:51:34 2016
New Revision: 235851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235851=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] powerpc64le -ffixed-cr2 -ffixed-cr3 -ffixed-cr4 ICE
gcc/
PR target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue May 3 14:43:35 2016
New Revision: 235825
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235825=gcc=rev
Log:
PR70890, stage2 miscompilation
PR rtl-optimization/70890
* ira.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-*-*|ia64-*-*, powerpc64-linux
at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38401
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38401=edit
patch under test
Andreas, please let me know if this cures the ia64 bootstrap problem. By
inspection the code looks g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70890
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69645
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69645
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Sat Apr 30 00:34:16 2016
New Revision: 235670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235670=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR69645, -ffixed-reg ignored
Treat -ffixed-reg as we do for global asm regs
|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2016-04-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-ffixed-cr2 -ffixed-cr3 -ffixed-cr4" } */
#define SET_CR(R,V) __asm__ __volatile__ ("mtcrf %0,%1" : : "
||2016-04-29
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
It looks like a testcase bug. -frename-regs happens to make main() use cr2,
and there doesn't seem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66033
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Comment #4 was added to the wrong bug. Not fixed on gcc-5 branch.
||amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|6.0 |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #28 from Alan Modra ---
Bootstrapped and regression testing now completed on both powerpc64le-linux and
-m64/-m32 on a power7 powerpc64-linux host, all langs. No regressions found,
and it seems this also fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #24 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38266
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38266=edit
testcase for gcc.dg/vect/
Revised testcase checking multiple offsets, using an array of structs so not
dependent on var
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38250
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38250=edit
stand alone testcase
Compile with -m64 -O3 -mcpu=power7 -fno-common
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
||2016-04-13
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
My analysis says this is not a linker error. Pass/fail
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Apr 12 22:59:05 2016
New Revision: 234925
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234925=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096
gcc/cp/
PR target/70107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Apr 12 22:59:05 2016
New Revision: 234925
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234925=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096
gcc/cp/
PR target/70107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Apr 12 22:58:36 2016
New Revision: 234924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234924=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096
gcc/cp/
PR target/70107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Apr 12 22:58:36 2016
New Revision: 234924
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234924=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix target/70107, another case of PR c++/70096
gcc/cp/
PR target/70107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Bootstrap and regression testing completed for both gcc-4.9 and gcc-5 branch
||2016-04-12
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
This is actually a duplicate of pr70096
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Apr 11 13:47:40 2016
New Revision: 234881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234881=gcc=rev
Log:
PR70117, ppc long double isinf
gcc/
PR target/70117
* builtins.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #18 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Mon Apr 11 13:46:51 2016
New Revision: 234880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234880=gcc=rev
Log:
PR70117, ppc long double isinf
gcc/
PR target/70117
* builtins.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Apr 8 02:11:52 2016
New Revision: 234821
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234821=gcc=rev
Log:
PR70117, ppc long double isinf
gcc/
PR target/70117
* builtins.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #14 from Alan Modra ---
> if (fmt == _extended_double)
No, there is mips_extended_format too.
at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
--- Comment #22 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 31 06:26:02 2016
New Revision: 234609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234609=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] reload_vsx_from_gprsf splitter
This is PR68973 part 2, caused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
--- Comment #21 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 31 06:24:40 2016
New Revision: 234608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234608=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] reload_vsx_from_gprsf splitter
This is PR68973 part 2, caused
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Mar 30 00:36:36 2016
New Revision: 234543
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234543=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR70052, ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case
gcc/
PR target/70052
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|5.3.1 |4.9.4
Summary|ICE compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Fri Mar 25 09:10:03 2016
New Revision: 234479
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234479=gcc=rev
Log:
[RS6000] PR70052, ICE compiling _Decimal128 test case
gcc/
PR target/70052
at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38072
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38072=edit
tentative patch
This hasn't been tested much, apart from verifying that the testcase compiles.
I also find that I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69645
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70263
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 38017
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38017=edit
possible fix
Maybe something as simple as this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63169
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54110
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32621
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26525
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26270
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #10 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:05:22 2016
New Revision: 234237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234237=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:04:54 2016
New Revision: 234236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234236=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #25 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:05:22 2016
New Revision: 234237
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234237=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #24 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:04:54 2016
New Revision: 234236
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234236=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #23 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:04:42 2016
New Revision: 234235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234235=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Tue Mar 15 22:04:42 2016
New Revision: 234235
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234235=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix thinko in indirect_jump_optimize
PR rtl-optimization/69195
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #7 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:48:58 2016
New Revision: 234103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234103=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #21 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:48:58 2016
New Revision: 234103
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234103=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:48:14 2016
New Revision: 234102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234102=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #20 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:48:14 2016
New Revision: 234102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234102=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47992
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:47:13 2016
New Revision: 234101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234101=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #19 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Mar 10 10:47:13 2016
New Revision: 234101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234101=gcc=rev
Log:
PR69195, Reload confused by invalid reg_equiv
Optimizing indirect jumps to direct
://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- |https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
|patches/2016-03/msg00361.ht |patches/2016-03/msg00604.ht
|ml |ml
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm not sure this is really a combine bug, but I noticed that for x86_64 and
gfortran.dg/pr46755.f, combine is able to convert
(insn 62 34 35 9 (set (reg/v:SI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
> Well, what I don't quite understand is that the gnulib value, which is
>
> 0x1.f7cp+1023
Sorry, I didn't look properly at the bug before commenting last night. For
some reason I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37863|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #15 from Alan Modra ---
Blah, that last patch segfaults all over the place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37862|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #13 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37862
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37862=edit
delete bad reg_equiv
A patch like this one that deletes reg_equiv notes that become invalid
according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37857
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37857=edit
workaround patch
Given the problems identified with notes (and of course the notes are what
drives reg_equiv_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Mar 2 14:05:21 2016
New Revision: 233906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233906=gcc=rev
Log:
decl alignment not respected
This patch cures a problem with ICF of read-only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
I don't think we can make the decl with the larger alignment prevail. Aren't
we stuck with "c" due to it being referenced by the constructor?
It goes like:
1) "c" is referenced in a constructor, thus
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Seen on powerpc64le-linux at -O1 -Wall
#pragma pack(1)
struct S0 {
unsigned f0 : 17;
};
int c;
int main(void)
{
struct S0 d[] = { { 1 }, { 2 } };
struct S0 e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Oh, and in case it isn't obvious, -free-loop-vectorize is what triggers the
alignment increase of arrays in pass_ipa_increase_alignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37817
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37817=edit
prevent var alias
Jan, does this look reasonable?
||2016-02-28
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
symtab_node
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following testcase on powerpc64le-linux results in
/usr/local/powerpc64le-linux/bin/ld: pack.o: In function `main':
pack.c:(.text.startup+0x10): error: R_PPC64_TOC16_LO_DS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68959
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra ---
*** Bug 68959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68959
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
||2016-02-17
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
fix in progress
||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
||patches/2016-02/msg01039.ht
||ml
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amodra at gmail dot com
||2016-02-16
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
Confirmed. Can be seen on other powerpc targets with -mno-mfcrf -misel.
401 - 500 of 1594 matches
Mail list logo
