https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116340
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 58907
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58907&action=edit
patch to split up test
effective_target_hard_float configurations of esirisc can do the optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116340
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
The test should be broken up into separate tests for single and double
precision.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116340
Bug ID: 116340
Summary: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/abs-4.c is a mess
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108357
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91940
--- Comment #12 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
But the condition I quoted rejects the recognition of a bswap16 with
non-promoted
arguments.
vectorizable_bswap doesn't do anything for processors that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91940
--- Comment #10 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Even if you add support for V2HI bswap, it won't help vectorization without
support for V4QI vectors and permutations, because vectorizable_bswap won't
recognize the bswap capability of the target a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91940
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
--- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 58861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58861&action=edit
proposed patch
Does this patch work for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116271
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
I have overlooked that, in the inner loop of s176, the array index i+m-j-1
turns negativeat for higher iterations of the middle loop for small m.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98289
--- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 58719
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58719&action=edit
patch to fix internal compiler errors in shrink-wrap.cc on EDGE_CROSSING edges
I'm currently using thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116022
Bug ID: 116022
Summary: complete (early) unrolling foils vectorizer for vector
initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98289
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112728
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> The gcc.dg/scantest-lto.c FAILs on quite a number of targets:
...
> * On Darwin, the __TEXT,__eh_frame contains .ascii because the assembler
> lacks su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112651
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112537
--- Comment #13 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Before we can consider any costs, we first have to know what they are. Is
there any manual for a hardware implementation that specifies costs?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112537
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111298
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111658
Bug ID: 111658
Summary: test-function-bodies fails to find functions with
single-letter names
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110951
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
I had a look at riscv_legitimize_move. It doesn't seem to suffer from quite
the same problem as legitimize_move does, but it could if another problem was
fixed: riscv_legitimize_move changes the rt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Also, the GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode).to_constant () <= MAX_BITS_PER_WORD
in the *mov_mem_to_mem splitter can generate unaligned accesses, yet it
is not guarded by a check that the target supports them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
riscv-v.cc:legitimize_move has:
if (MEM_P (dest) && !REG_P (src))
src = force_reg (mode, src);
return false;
since src is passed by value, this is pointless. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111020
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50837|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> Btw, we already disable the floating-point to_chars on targets without a
> binary64 double. So is our test for detecting binary64 not accurate enough,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
--- Comment #4 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke ---
Created attachment 50837
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50837&action=edit
Proposed patch
This patch fixes the problem for eSi-RISC and bootstraps on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
, with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100361
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
31 matches
Mail list logo
