https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109345
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Paul,
the fix was fine for 15-mainline and 14-branch.
There seems to be testsuite fallout on 13-branch (pr116040), because this
fix apparently depends on the fix for pr89645, which is quite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #23 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #22)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #21)
> > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #20)
> > > OK the regression is fixed - thanks f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115997
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original issue was reported for findloc, but did occur with several other
intrinsics accepting deferred-length character. If you edit the bugzilla
search to include resolved issues, you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #20)
> OK the regression is fixed - thanks for the green light, Harald.
>
> It's a pity that I have missed the 4.2 release :-(
>
> P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #17 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #16)
> Created attachment 58717 [details]
> Fix for the regression
>
> The mechanism in the original fix was OK but the use of the lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #15 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #14)
> Seems to affect only dummies, not local arrays.
Comparing the dump tree between working and failing, the order of the
generation of the descriptors se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Further reduced:
program p
implicit none
integer, parameter :: nx = 64
real, dimension(nx) :: x, s, d, f
print *, shape (x), shape (s), shape (d), shape (f)
call sub (x,s,d,f)
contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 59104, which changed state.
Bug 59104 Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55858
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110288
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mscfd at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115997
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58695|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
--- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #12)
> Created attachment 58695 [details]
> Tentative patch
>
> This patch fixes the ICE by ensuring to derive the element size of constant
> cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Interesting observation: replacing
call use_mats(mats)
by
call use_mats(mats(lbound(mats,1):))
leads to apparently correct output:
top level: mats, lbound= 2, ubound= 4
top level, 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115884
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115935
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100273
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113363
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #10)
> Leave open partly because it is awaiting backporting to 14-branch but also
> because there are remaining, pre-existing issues involving paren
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Paul,
are you planning to backport your fix?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13 regression] Bogus
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
F2018 has:
16.9.146 OUT_OF_RANGE (X, MOLD [, ROUND])
Description. Whether a value cannot be converted safely.
Class. Elemental function.
Arguments.
X shall be of type integer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107996
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-02
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115711
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115689
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #4)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #3)
> > The code you posted is standard conforming, and when
> > compiled, executes as expected.
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The following - seemingly hackish - change fixes the ICE:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc
index 93b633e212e..60275e18867 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978
--- Comment #33 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've been repeatedly struggling with the testcase in comment#19.
Since the dump-tree did not reveal anything, I ran a reduced version
under gdb to see why the code crashes at -O0 and -Og
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 115390, which changed state.
Bug 115390 Summary: Bogus -Wuninitialized warning when using CHARACTER(*)
argument in BIND(C) function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115401
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-06-09
Ever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115348
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to fail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107141
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #5)
> Bit more detail from valgrind:
>
> /Lower/derived-type-finalization.f90
> ==687074== Invalid read of size 8
> ==687074==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115390
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Slightly rewritten (we only need the interface of foo):
module test
implicit none
interface
subroutine foo(s)
character(*), intent(in) :: s
end subroutine foo
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114019
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #2)
> Created attachment 58346 [details]
> Reduced testcase
>
> Reduced for subsequent analysis.
Further datapoint: replacing the dummy argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58346
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58346=edit
Reduced testcase
Reduced for subsequent analysis.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The ICE is fixed by:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc
index 9b497d6bdc6..605107b5168 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115315
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.3.0
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103139
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.1, 12.3.1, 13.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115260
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.5.0
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58302
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58302=edit
Partial patch
This change prevents the ICE and leads to a correct shape of the function
res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #16 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #15)
> Quick update:
>
> Software stack and model build with gnu/13.3.0 was clear from all previous
> issues! So issue with the gnu/13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93635
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766
Bug 27766 depends on bug 86100, which changed state.
Bug 86100 Summary: Spurious error with -fcheck=bounds and allocatable class(*)
array components
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
--- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #8)
> I simply copied all the associated functions in trans-expr.cc from mainline
> and plonked them in 13-branch. That's why I said
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115193
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.mulhall at noaa dot gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #9)
> All rebuilt, gnu/14.1.0 with openmpi/4.1.6, revised configuration of the
> software stack (spack-stack). Still the same error with
> [-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
--- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Backporting to 13-branch requires backporting of r14-5931-gb247e917ff1332,
see pr110415.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #7 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
> >
> > Can you please tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The traceback is essentially identical to that in pr114467.
Can you please try the 14-release like the other reporter, or the upcoming
13.3 release next week?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67740
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clange001 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106317
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing the scalar argument 'obs' by something with rank > 0 avoids the ICE,
but then assumed-rank is not accepted with intent(out). Another bug...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115070
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.3.1
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115072
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Memory link with unlimited |Memory leak with unlimited
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115039
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As reported in:
https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/real-and-imaginary-parts-of-complex-number/1113/18
an inquiry reference (%re, %im) is incorrectly reported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The code fragment in comment#2 was added in r7-3760-g92c5266bbd5378.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86100
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114922
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The dump-fortran-original shows the following difference between 13 and 14:
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
code:
ASSIGN p:c 'abc'
- BLOCK
+ SELECT TYPE
symtree: '__tmp_CHARACTER_0_1'|| symbol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114859
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #17
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2024-April/060464.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58048|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #0)
> The following code fails for me with latest 14-branch/15-release candidate:
Oops, I meant: 14-release candidate/15-mainline after branching...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114874
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.5.0, 11.4.1, 12.3.1
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following code fails for me with latest 14-branch/15-release candidate:
program p
implicit none
class
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 58056
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58056=edit
Patch part 2.
This part fixes the array case. Needs further testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114827
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
--- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #11)
> It would be splendid if you would backport the patch. In the last week or
> so, I have built up quite a list of backports to do, which I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #9)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #8)
> > I get the same behavior at r13-8559 as 14-mainline. There seems to be
> > another co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114815
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
1 - 100 of 2610 matches
Mail list logo
