[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

2017-10-05 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #19 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #17) > > Could you put some instructions in this BZ about how you build and test the > kernel to get these errors ? I'

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

2017-09-20 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #16 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #15) > (In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #13) > > The kernel does not currently use -mword-relocations. We are looking into

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

2017-09-20 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #13 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- The kernel does not currently use -mword-relocations. We are looking into it as an alternative to -fpic when building the kernel image as a PIE executable so we can self-relocate at boot

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

2017-08-21 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #9 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- (In reply to Yvan Roux from comment #8) > On 7 branch the following should fix the issue, but as I mentioned in > comment #5, maybe TARGET_USE_MOVT is a better place to do the checki

[Bug target/81863] [7 regression] -mword-relocations is unreliable

2017-08-17 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81863 --- Comment #6 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- FWIW, the following makes the issue go away (tested on 4.9.4) @@ -6196,7 +6210,9 @@ [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r") (lo_sum:SI

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

2016-01-25 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #50 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #49) > (In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #48) > > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #47) > > > (In reply

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

2016-01-25 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #48 from ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org --- (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #47) > (In reply to ard.biesheuvel from comment #46) > > One issue that this causes, which I did not see mentioned anywhere in the >

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

2016-01-24 Thread ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 ard.biesheuvel at linaro dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ard.biesheuvel at