https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116174
--- Comment #7 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I confirmed that the patch from comment #6 addresses the build warnings I see
in the kernel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113214
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
The warning is now turned off in the kernel as a workaround:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=whzbdlc024nxgjesfoopj9bo2bkuxhxr4h5wosyk9a...@mail.gmail.com/
Also, my local one-line workaround is applied fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113214
Bug ID: 113214
Summary: false-positive -Wstringop-overflow warning with thread
sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108402
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110743
Bug ID: 110743
Summary: Unexpected -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern behavior
with partial bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110074
Bug ID: 110074
Summary: code bloat with -fprofile-args + -fsanitize=bounds
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108433
Bug ID: 108433
Summary: canadian cross aarch64/x86_64/aarch64 fails to build
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105930
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104711
Bug ID: 104711
Summary: Unnecessary -Wshift-negative-value warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102162
--- Comment #27 from Arnd Bergmann ---
The linux kernel instance from arch/parisc/ looks like a bug we fixed in
arch/arm a few years ago, by adding the required alignment directive to the
linker script.
If changing the linker script is not poss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102162
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673
--- Comment #4 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I posted a set of kernel patches to address all the warnings I found at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210322160253.4032422-1-a...@kernel.org/T/#t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Thank you for the detailed analysis. This was the last such warning I get with
linux kernel randconfig build that I could not explain based on the earlier
discussion, so now I can submit the local workarounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99673
Bug ID: 99673
Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-overread warning with
address sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92860
Bug 92860 depends on bug 99592, which changed state.
Bug 99592 Summary: arm: internal compiler error using arm_neon.h with -pg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|WAITING
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
--- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Created attachment 50395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50395&action=edit
preprocessed /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/11/include/arm_neon.h
I've changed from the Ubuntu gcc-11 s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
--- Comment #9 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I now built gcc with and without the patch from attachment 50390 to find more
broken kernel configurations and verify that they are all fixed. So far, all
the broken configurations are fixed by the patch, I'l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
--- Comment #4 from Arnd Bergmann ---
$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-11 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-11
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/11/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-linux-gnueabihf
Configured wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
https://godbolt.org/z/z7h7r3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99600
Bug ID: 99600
Summary: [11 regression] out of memory for simple test case
(x86 -march=atom)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99596
Bug ID: 99596
Summary: arm: internal error in single_pred_edge
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99592
Bug ID: 99592
Summary: arm: internal compiler error using arm_neon.h with -pg
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I figured out the qnx4 warning in the end: https://godbolt.org/z/hvqjr3
struct qnx4_inode_entry {
char di_status;
union {
struct {
char di_fname[16];
char di_pad[32];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4)
> Most warnings designed to detect invalid accesses (not just
> -Wstringop-overread but also -Wstringop-overflow and
> -Wformat-overflow/-truncation, -Wrestrict, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #3 from Arnd Bergmann ---
After some more analysis, I found that the -Wstringop-overread warning only
happens here (and presumably in all the other cases I found) because I disabled
-Warray-bounds for gcc-11.
I'm still looking at -Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
Ok, I see. Thanks for the explanation!
I found a couple other instances (so far all false positive) and will see if
any of them have a sane workaround. I'll probably just turn off both flags
globally for the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99567
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99567
--- Comment #2 from Arnd Bergmann ---
*** Bug 99570 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99570
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99567
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
*** Bug 99574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99574
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Bug ID: 99578
Summary: gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning
when accessing a pointer from integer literal
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99570
--- Comment #1 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I suppose this is a duplicate of #99567 and #99574, these happen with different
compiler flags, but the backtrace is always the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99574
Bug ID: 99574
Summary: gcc-11 unrecognizable insn in extract_constrain_insn,
at recog.c:2670
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99570
Bug ID: 99570
Summary: internal error in extract_constrain_insn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99567
Bug ID: 99567
Summary: internal error in extract_constrain_insn with
asan-stack
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97490
Bug ID: 97490
Summary: [10/11 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow=
with address sanitizer
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
40 matches
Mail list logo
