https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108634
--- Comment #1 from Arsen Arsenović ---
The kernel's using wrong C(XX)FLAGS to compile the plugin. IMO, the best
solution would be to dump $(ALL_COMPILERFLAGS) $(ALL_CPPFLAGS) into a makefile
that gets installed, so that plugins can use that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300
--- Comment #11 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #10)
> I think Jonathan's proposal makes it unnecessarily complex. Renaming `abort`
> to `gcc_fancy_abort`, as well as all invocations accordingly, should be much
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108300
--- Comment #9 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #8)
> The commit above just lets GCC bootstrap on Windows. The cause of this issue
> is still there.
>
> Maybe it's possible to replace all direct calls to `abort()` in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108250
--- Comment #8 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Created attachment 54166
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54166=edit
xz'd preprocessed CodeGenDagPatterns.cpp
Cmdline: [220/231] /usr/bin/g++-12 -DGTEST_HAS_RTTI=0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108250
--- Comment #7 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Created attachment 54165
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54165=edit
hang-testing script
With the attached script, I singled out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107607
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at aarsen dot me
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
--- Comment #7 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Yes, this and https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106188 both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107147
--- Comment #4 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Ah, my bad, I had checking off in my 12.2.0 build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107147
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at aarsen dot me
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104605
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at aarsen dot me
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107135
Arsen Arsenović changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arsen at aarsen dot me
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103626
--- Comment #6 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Agreed. Now that I think about it, it'd be just as easy to spot errors if
something in freestanding is relying on a hosted feature by just trying to
#include those headers on a freestanding install, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103626
--- Comment #4 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I don't think we need to add the #error to every header. For a start, users
> never include the bits/* headers directly, and if they do, it's their
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103626
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
I started work on marking headers, and I already marked 162 headers (all of
include/{std,bits,backward}, where appropriate) as part of my work on P1642.
This set also lines up with the set of all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Created attachment 53491
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53491=edit
Reduced test case
Alright, managed to get a reduced test case out of C-Vise. Though, this doesn't
build on clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
--- Comment #1 from Arsen Arsenović ---
Created attachment 53490
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53490=edit
Preprocessed test (gz-compressed)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106713
Bug ID: 106713
Summary: Coroutine regression in GCC 11.3.0: if (co_await ...)
crashes with a jump to ud2
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
17 matches
Mail list logo
