[Bug libobjc/38307] Calling of the +initialize method is not completely thread-safe

2011-03-17 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307 --- Comment #7 from David Ayers 2011-03-17 07:14:27 UTC --- Thanks a lot for picking it up! I'll keep an eye out for your version and will take it for a spin when it comes available.

[Bug libobjc/38307] Calling of the +initialize method is not completely thread-safe

2011-03-16 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307 --- Comment #5 from David Ayers 2011-03-16 13:33:07 UTC --- I haven't looked at my patch for quite some time but I don't remember that there was an issue and did quite some extensive tests... but anyway it surely has bit-rotted since. If you're

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-02-25 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #7 from ayers at fsfe dot org 2009-02-26 05:24 --- Created an attachment (id=17365) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17365&action=view) Alternative patch using a callback hook This patch was posted as an RFA: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-02-25 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #6 from ayers at fsfe dot org 2009-02-26 05:16 --- Created an attachment (id=17364) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17364&action=view) Updated patch (using and accessor function) inlcuding a test case For the record: This is an update of the e