[Bug ada/53590] New: new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function

2012-06-06 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590 Bug #: 53590 Summary: new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug ada/53590] new compiler generates both SISD and SIMD instructions for parallel operations of a pure function

2012-06-06 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53590 --- Comment #1 from Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2012-06-06 13:29:36 UTC --- For comparison, consider this, giving expected results (1 DIVPD). -- 8 -- typedef double fpt; typedef fpt Vec[2]; struct ArrayWrap { Vec

[Bug ada/52752] GNAT bug box on instantiation of subprogram with not null-qualified named access type

2012-03-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52752 Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bauhaus

[Bug ada/50600] New: Illegal instruction when using pragma Profile (Restricted)

2011-10-03 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50600 Bug #: 50600 Summary: Illegal instruction when using pragma Profile (Restricted) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/48844] New: GNAT bug box, referring to gimplify.c, possibly to do with aliasing and discriminant

2011-05-02 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 Summary: GNAT bug box, referring to gimplify.c, possibly to do with aliasing and discriminant Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/48844] GNAT bug box, referring to gimplify.c, possibly to do with aliasing and discriminant

2011-05-02 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48844 Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24166|0 |1

[Bug ada/48621] New: Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

2011-04-15 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 Summary: Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

2011-04-15 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 --- Comment #2 from Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2011-04-15 14:16:38 UTC --- I did first run $ make boostrap which I should have stated less implicitly, sorry. And then, as the report says, $ make check # with -k, actually. ACATS

[Bug ada/48621] Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible ALI file

2011-04-15 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621 --- Comment #4 from Georg Bauhaus bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2011-04-15 16:55:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I have started again using a absolute path to configure, as you have suggested. Thanks, let's see whether this changes

[Bug ada/41286] a warning about renamed function result is possibly confusing

2009-09-07 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2009-09-07 19:37 --- Line should be Text, sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41286

[Bug ada/34507] Bug box, Assert_Failure einfo.adb:814 on illegal Ada 2005 program

2009-03-01 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #2 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2009-03-01 21:52 --- This is still present in 4.4.0 gcc -c pak2.ads +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.4.0 20090301 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Assert_Failure einfo.adb:837

[Bug ada/36250] New: --enable-threads=gnat stops build

2008-05-16 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36250

[Bug ada/33994] wrong code for indexed component when index subtype has 'Size 32

2007-11-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #4 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-11-29 10:25 --- I expect that in the case described in the report (#0) the compiler does not produce wrong code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33994

[Bug ada/33994] wrong code for indexed component when index subtype has 'Size 32

2007-11-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #5 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-11-29 10:27 --- BTW, I have named the procedure Too_Big for a reason ... :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33994

[Bug ada/34117] Please enable range checks by default (-gnato)

2007-11-20 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #4 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-11-20 14:49 --- I can't resist pointing out that right now I am seeing an update to widely used free software where once again an integer overflow is creating a security hole in the system. (CVE-2007-4619) -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug ada/33994] New: wrong code for indexed component when index subtype has 'Size 32

2007-11-04 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
'Size 32 Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: i686

[Bug ada/33994] wrong code for indexed component when index subtype has 'Size 32

2007-11-04 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-11-04 22:55 --- $ S$ uname -a Linux K72 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Sun Oct 14 23:05:12 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux $ gnatmake -save-temps -gnata -gnato -gnatwa -S too_big.adb -cargs -v -largs -v gcc -c -save-temps -gnata -gnato -gnatwa -S

[Bug ada/33994] wrong code for indexed component when index subtype has 'Size 32

2007-11-04 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #2 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-11-04 23:02 --- Side note: With a special command line, this program triggers a bug box with gcc 4.1.3 (Ubuntu 7.10 i686). $ gnatmake -W -S -march=x86-64 -m64 -Os too_big.adb gcc-4.1 -c -W -S -march=x86-64 -m64 -Os too_big.adb

[Bug ada/32318] New: GNAT.Calendar.Time_IO %c incorrectly claims to be reporting the time zone

2007-06-13 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC target triplet: i486-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32318

[Bug ada/25117] GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, verify_ssa failed

2007-02-03 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #8 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2007-02-03 21:04 --- Subject: Re: GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, verify_ssa failed On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 09:51 +, tbm at cyrius dot com wrote: --- Comment #7 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-03 09:51 --- (In reply

[Bug ada/30614] New: compiler puts the blame on in parameter mode, not pointer to constant, for assignment to component

2007-01-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
to constant, for assignment to component Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de

[Bug ada/30078] [ Ada ] problems mixing Tasks and recursion

2006-12-05 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-12-05 22:40 --- Same when using gcc version 4.3.0 20061130 (experimental) The only invariant in the output is that As Bs. -- bauhaus at futureapps dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/29112] New: misleading error message for declarations in the wrong place

2006-09-16 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686

[Bug ada/27225] Wide_String slice assignment in nested procedure does not work properly

2006-06-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #4 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-06-27 08:00 --- Works now, using gcc version 4.1.2 20060626 (prerelease) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27225

[Bug testsuite/26614] make check fails during fixincludes testing.

2006-06-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #3 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-06-27 09:18 --- Same here, Fixed: X11/Xmu.h Fixed: Xm/BaseClassI.h Fixed: Xm/Traversal.h Newly fixed header: ia64/sys/getppdp.h There were fixinclude test FAILURES make[2]: *** [check] Error 1 The generated file ./fixincludes

[Bug ada/27225] Wide_String slice assignment in nested procedure does not work properly

2006-04-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #3 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-04-30 02:35 --- One more that doesn't work: result(txt'first .. txt'first + 3) := ('x', 'x', 'x', 'x'); These rewritten assignments do work as expected result(txt'first .. txt'first + 3) := (1 .. 4 = 'x

[Bug ada/27225] New: Wide_String slice assignment in nested procedure does not work properly

2006-04-20 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27225

[Bug ada/27225] Wide_String slice assignment in nested procedure does not work properly

2006-04-20 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-04-20 11:28 --- I forgot: $ gnatmake p $ ./p raised PROGRAM_ERROR : p.adb:11 explicit raise (The Assert is a relic of an earlier program and not an issue.) -- bauhaus at futureapps dot de changed: What|Removed

[Bug ada/27225] Wide_String slice assignment in nested procedure does not work properly

2006-04-20 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #2 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-04-20 16:57 --- Apperently, this is fixed in the 4.2 trunk, 113114. Same error with 4.02. (Not in 3.4.5 of GNAT GPL edition) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27225

[Bug ada/26465] New: Ada.Characters.Conversions comment announces Ada.Characters.Handling

2006-02-25 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Ada.Characters.Handling Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug ada/25902] New: GNAT Bug Box, Assert_Failure in sem when using default box for invisible record component

2006-01-21 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc

[Bug ada/25902] GNAT Bug Box, Assert_Failure in sem when using default box for invisible record component

2006-01-21 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2006-01-21 22:00 --- works in: 3.4.5 20050524 (prerelease) for GNAT GPL 2005 (20050614) (by AdaCore) does not work (Bug box, too): 4.0.2 20050808 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.0.1-4ubuntu9) (i486-pc-linux-gnu) -- bauhaus at futureapps dot de

[Bug ada/25117] GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, verify_ssa failed

2005-11-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #5 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-11-29 08:56 --- Created an attachment (id=10359) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10359action=view) source file set for the 4.1 Bug Box To reproduce, $ cd src $ gcc -c -gnatwecfijkmruv -gnaty3abcefhiklmnoprstx

[Bug ada/25117] GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, verify_ssa failed

2005-11-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #6 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-11-29 09:30 --- Created an attachment (id=10360) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10360action=view) source file set for the 4.2 Bug Box To reproduce, $ cd src $ gcc -c -gnatwecfijkmruv -gnaty3abcefhiklmnoprstx

[Bug ada/25117] New: GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR

2005-11-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug ada/25117] GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR

2005-11-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #1 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-11-27 12:31 --- another one when using a 4.2 compiler instead. $ make clean $ make setup $ make build gcc -c -gnatwecfijkmruv -gnaty3abcefhiklmnoprstx -Wall -O2 -gnatn -I- -gnatA /werkstatt/src/AWS/src/aws-attachments.adb

[Bug ada/25117] GNAT Bug Box, GCC error, verify_ssa failed

2005-11-27 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #3 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-11-27 21:26 --- OK if I attach an archive of (most of) the sources of AWS, ready for make build? Otherwise I'll have to see whether I can cut some of the .gpr dependenies in AWS modules in order to downsize the sources. -- http

[Bug testsuite/23400] [4.1 Regression] make check fixinclude failure

2005-11-20 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Comment #7 from bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-11-20 17:56 --- PR 23400 * inclhack.def: Add newline to the replace text for string.h. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. Similarly, removing \n from last line of the string.h in the fixincludes source directory

[Bug ada/23973] New: without -gnat05, GNAT warns that interface is new kw, but misses one frequent occurence

2005-09-19 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux

[Bug testsuite/23400] [4.1 Regression] make check fixinclude failure

2005-09-15 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-09-15 20:33 --- Does not work for me, checkouts from Sep. 8, and from today (Sep. 15). Exact same error when running make check, after make bootstrap. Debian stable, SMP, autogen 5.6.6-2, autoconf 2.59a-3, .../configure

[Bug testsuite/23400] [4.1 Regression] make check fixinclude failure

2005-09-15 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-09-16 03:11 --- looking at tests/res/string.h in the build area, it does lack \n at EOF, so the message is correct. (All other files do have \n at EOF.) inclhack.def:2004 has the following comment. /* The string.h result

[Bug ada/22039] New: special functions for string concat of 3/4/5 args doc'ed to concat two

2005-06-12 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
args doc'ed to concat two Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot

[Bug ada/20596] Bug Box, combination of Ada 2005, dotted notation, Hash_Maps, and Unbounded_String

2005-03-24 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-03-24 13:18 --- Subject: Re: Bug Box, combination of Ada 2005, dotted notation, Hash_Maps, and Unbounded_String laurent at guerby dot net wrote: --- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-03-23 11

[Bug ada/20596] New: Bug Box, combination of Ada 2005, dotted notation, Hash_Maps, and Unbounded_String

2005-03-22 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target

[Bug ada/19519] GNAT Bug Box when reading a program with UTF-8 encoded enumeration literals

2005-01-19 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-01-19 12:40 --- Created an attachment (id=7990) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7990action=view) test case as a file attachment, as requested also triggered by this compiler

[Bug bootstrap/19517] New: --enable-languages=c,ada enables Ada twice, and possibly breaks gcc/options.h in the build directory

2005-01-18 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug ada/19519] New: GNAT Bug Box when reading a program with UTF-8 encoded enumeration literals

2005-01-18 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc

[Bug bootstrap/19517] --enable-languages=c,ada enables Ada twice, and possibly breaks gcc/options.h in the build directory

2005-01-18 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2005-01-19 00:50 --- Argh, yes. There was another ada subdirectory, my fault, sorry. After removing it, options.h now looks good, no more duplicates. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19517

[Bug ada/19002] GNAT BUG DETECTED, unqualified record aggregate triggers

2004-12-14 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
--- Additional Comments From bauhaus at futureapps dot de 2004-12-15 03:18 --- The offending(?) line is in the procedure Space_Info.mark, I should have said, in the procedure mark in the protected body of the Space_Info's Map type. Sorry. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug ada/19002] New: GNAT BUG DETECTED, unqualified record aggregate triggers

2004-12-14 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
, unqualified record aggregate triggers Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de

[Bug ada/18227] New: incomplete type in private part of inner package visible in outer package

2004-10-29 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18227

[Bug ada/17985] New: GNAT accepts extension aggregate where expexted type is not extension

2004-10-13 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ada AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17985

[Bug other/12903] New: configure fails to produce ada subdirectory

2003-11-04 Thread bauhaus at futureapps dot de
Priority: P2 Component: other AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bauhaus at futureapps dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin6.6 GCC target triplet