[Bug middle-end/60855] ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured stack-allocated array

2014-04-15 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60855 --- Comment #1 from Brady J. Garvin --- Also ICEs in 4.9.0: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper

[Bug middle-end/60855] New: ICE provoked by a lambda using the sizeof a captured statically allocated array

2014-04-15 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bgarvin at acm dot org Created attachment 32611 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32611&action=edit Preprocessed source $ cat gcc-bug.cpp i

[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
--- Comment #4 from bgarvin at acm dot org 2010-02-02 01:43 --- (In reply to comment #3) > >torture > For the torture test you can set the TORTURE OPTIONS separately and let the > testsuite do the rest. > Yeah, that's what I meant. Thanks for the clarification

[Bug testsuite/42933] Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
--- Comment #2 from bgarvin at acm dot org 2010-02-02 01:30 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well RUNTESTFLAGS is really only useful for options which change the ABI and > have a multilib. Like -fPIC/-m64/-m32, etc. -std=c++0x changes the input > language which is used so

[Bug testsuite/42933] New: Test suite reports excess unexpected failures when using RUNTESTFLAGS to pass extra options

2010-02-01 Thread bgarvin at acm dot org
: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bgarvin at acm dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42933