[Bug bootstrap/89140] libiberty/pex-unix.c fails to compile in aarch64-to-x86_64 cross build

2021-09-05 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89140 Brett Neumeier changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/80196] fenv_t not declared

2021-08-20 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196 Brett Neumeier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bneumeier at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
||bneumeier at gmail dot com Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Brett Neumeier --- Confirmed, the issue does not occur with 2.33.1. Thank you for your attention and help!

[Bug middle-end/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318 --- Comment #6 from Brett Neumeier --- The host binutils (used to compile the cross-toolchain): $ as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.34.0.20200507 Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may

[Bug bootstrap/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318 --- Comment #3 from Brett Neumeier --- Created attachment 48596 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48596=edit result of compilation with -fno-align-loop specified

[Bug bootstrap/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318 --- Comment #2 from Brett Neumeier --- Created attachment 48595 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48595=edit result of compilation with default settings

[Bug bootstrap/95318] New: gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This issue is seen when building an X86_64-to-AArch64 cross-compiler using

[Bug bootstrap/95318] gcc 10.1 on x86_64 fails to build aarch64 cross-compiler when using default optimization settings

2020-05-25 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95318 --- Comment #1 from Brett Neumeier --- Created attachment 48594 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48594=edit preprocessed source

[Bug other/89140] New: libiberty/pex-unix.c fails to compile in aarch64-to-x86_64 cross build

2019-01-31 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 45575 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45575=edit patch to correct pex-unix.c header f

[Bug c/86460] New: GCC 8.1 cross-compiler fails to compile linux kernel

2018-07-10 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I have an AMD64-to-mipsel GCC 8.1 with branch updates through 2018-06-30. When I try to compile Linux 4.17.4 with it, the build crashes at arch/mips/kernel/signal.c

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

2018-02-02 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 --- Comment #4 from Brett Neumeier --- Created attachment 43324 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43324=edit Patch to add rpath for GMP, MPC, MPFR, ISL when needed OK. I'm just going to leave this patch here -- tested and

[Bug bootstrap/84153] Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

2018-01-31 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84153 Brett Neumeier changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug bootstrap/84153] New: Bootstrap failure when using dependency libraries in non-system location

2018-01-31 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I am trying to build a native GCC to install under my home directory, in $HOME/gcc73. I first build, out of tree, GMP 6.1.2

[Bug c/81840] New: Incorrect warning issued in arm-to-x86_64 cross compilation

2017-08-13 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 41985 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41985=edit preprocessed source code that demonstrates the is

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

2016-03-14 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #13 from Brett Neumeier --- OK, then it would make sense to have a documentation fix for GCC that specifies those exact versions for GMP, MPC, and MPFR as the versions that must be used, rather than claiming -- inaccurately! --

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

2016-03-14 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #10 from Brett Neumeier --- Bernd, I don't think there is any argument that those specific versions of the library dependencies work. My sense is that it is a bug to assert "GNU Multiple Precision Library (GMP) version 4.3.2 (or

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

2015-10-03 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #6 from Brett Neumeier --- Created attachment 36441 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36441=edit document symptoms of problem and workaround Since the issue is a corner-case (it's only triggered when

[Bug c/67728] New: Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP

2015-09-26 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bneumeier at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36399 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36399=edit Don't disable assembly when building GMP in-tree GMP has an issue when it is be

[Bug bootstrap/67728] Build fails when cross-compiling with in-tree GMP and ISL

2015-09-26 Thread bneumeier at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728 --- Comment #2 from Brett Neumeier --- Thanks for your swift comment! I disagree that the bug is in ISL. The problem is that gmp, although the build appears successful, is *not* correctly built. Six object files that should be compiled and