--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19
11:16 ---
Fixed by patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
14:44 ---
It can be fixed using the per-directory build infrastructure, but .java files
cannot be reliably compiled to the binary-compatibility abi.
--
What|Removed |Added
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||21624
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20155
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12
14:10 ---
Not fixing the hunk -- removing it actually!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17845
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12
08:09 ---
This code in do_resolve_class seems bogus to me. Fixing it removes the failure.
Note that java.security is in the package_list because of Dummy.java, but it
absolutely does *not* belong in the search path
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
12:18 ---
Reduced test case:
==> Dummy.java <==
package java.security;
class Dummy
{
}
==> gnuX509Certificate.java <==
package gnu.java.security.x509;
class X509Certifi
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
11:41 ---
This is a bootstrap bug, the bug is in the toplevel Makefile.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
11:06 ---
I'll try to produce a reduced test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17845
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11
11:04 ---
It can be reproduced in libgcj, with --enable-libgcj-multifile.
Paolo
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 21418 depends on bug 21436, which changed state.
Bug 21436 Summary: imports not remembered for previously compiled files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21436
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
13:55 ---
Patch committed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10
12:58 ---
Looks like a register pressure problem... but yes, TARGET_MEM_REF may help as
well.
Paolo
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--
Bug 21418 depends on bug 21442, which changed state.
Bug 21442 Summary: problem with imports and multifile builds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21442
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09
10:03 ---
*** Bug 21442 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09
10:03 ---
The problem is that, while looking for AbstractInterruptibleChannel (a
superclass of SelectableChannel), we do not look into the imports of
SelectableChannel.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||21418
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21442
mports and multifile builds
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||21442
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21436
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-07
09:22 ---
With this version of AWTEvent.java, this is an ice-on-valid:
package java.awt;
import java.util.EventObject;
public abstract class AWTEvent extends EventObject {
AWTEvent() { super(null
bered for previously compiled files
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bonzini at gcc dot gnu do
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|SUSPENDED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03
08:14 ---
The reason is that ia64 does not have any option to enable special SIMD
instructions, so it can vectorize these tests using hardware 64-bit vectors.
The two tests should be skipped on ia64, and actually
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-26
17:35 ---
Another thing that CSE does is promoting paradoxical subregs to regs. On
PowerPC at least, recursive calls of fold_rtx are almost ineffective except for
this. Such promotion helps because equiv_constant
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-14
08:44 ---
Does the patch there fix it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21015
--
Bug 19454 depends on bug 20600, which changed state.
Bug 20600 Summary: [4.1 regression] failure for pass.c on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20600
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-01
08:25 ---
Committed fix at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-04/msg00019.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
17:44 ---
Added PR20600, since the patch causes that regression. Both patches were
approved for 4.0 once the PR20600 patch is approved into mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24
17:43 ---
This patch should go in 4.0.0, because it blocks PR19454.
--
What|Removed |Added
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, patch
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bonzini at gcc dot gnu
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-21
14:23 ---
I'm looking into why the patch fixes the change
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19454
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-28
13:30 ---
Fixed on mainline. As I said in comment #15, DJ has patches for the 4.0 branch,
so I am assigning it to him.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-14
09:12 ---
Patch applied.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
12:51 ---
Oh, and VTOP notes were killed on mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17860
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-10
12:50 ---
No, it is not, still I would not close it as WONTFIX. I'd rather see it
suspended, and even better I'd like to see an approval for Zdenek's unsafe loop
optimization patch.
--
htt
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08
15:09 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08
09:19 ---
CCing Geoff since he wrote the hunk I modify in macro.c. It looks like a pasto,
but I am not sure.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08
09:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=8139)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8139&action=view)
proposed patch
Pretty obvious patch if it weren't for the hunk in macro.c.
Patch is in
y: P1
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,mark at codesourcery dot
com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19818
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-03
16:49 ---
To the reporter: in this case you probably want __attribute__ ((leafify)), just
in case, though you are right in expecting the compiler to inline it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
15:56 ---
> Such major addition is not suitable for stage 3 in my opinion (but very
> welcome for stage 1), we want a much more localized change, which is certainly
> possible here.
I don't think so.
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-27
14:09 ---
You may try adding a gnattools directory, whose makefile and configury is based
on libada's, but which is a host module rather than a target module.
Nathanael knows best, I think.
--
http://gcc.gn
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||neroden at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Summary|gnat tools
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
08:29 ---
Removing 4.0.0 from known-to-fail list.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
08:28 ---
The thread on -funsafe-loop-optimizations extinguished without any result.
Zdenek, maybe you should propose the patch together with adding
-Wunsafe-loop-optimizations to -Wextra, and without adding
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-22
10:04 ---
Combine ought to merge these two
(insn 13 11 14 1 (parallel [
(set (reg:QI 60)
(and:QI (subreg:QI (reg/v:SI 59 [ v ]) 0)
(const_int 3 [0x3
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:47 ---
Steven, building cc1 to sh-unknown-elf with your patch succeeded.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
13:27 ---
I've fixed the doc/passes.texi (commit in progress).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19528
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13
13:19 ---
Looking at the pre-autogen Makefile.in it looks like it never worked actually.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/Makefile.in?rev=1.111&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13
13:03 ---
The problem is that install-* does not depend on all-*
On the other hand, that would slow down the installation process. Making
install-* depend on configure-* is not enough as well, because even if the
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-30
10:39 ---
Nope, my patch is not sufficient. I am testing a better fix, but I fear it is
too invasive for 4.0. It is a variant of the often-proposed "build out of
srcdir without telling the user&q
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28
18:49 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg02012.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28
18:48 ---
Interestingly, on arm-elf the hog is CSE, because each copy of b is given a
different pseudo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19097
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28
17:44 ---
Looking at it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18308
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-28
17:42 ---
Patch applied.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12
08:45 ---
The patch that caused it to fail is actually this one.
2004-11-04 Geoffrey Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.in (distclean): Don't delete nonexistent fixinc/ directory.
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 13:30
---
> Jumps out of statement expressions are or were used in real code
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-05/msg00770.html>. I don't think
> they are well-defined (except for jumps
--
Bug 17832 depends on bug 17991, which changed state.
Bug 17991 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Two-process fixincludes broken: pz_mn_name_pat
undefined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17991
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:44
---
Fixed by the above commit.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 07:54
---
I'm going to commit this as obvious in a few hours unless someone screams.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17991
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-25 07:39
---
--enable-bootstrap would build libcpp and libiberty with the newly-built GCC.
It is correct that the host compiler is used.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18139
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-21 09:52
---
Aaron, I'm assigning the PR to you because it is very close to being fixed, and
I think it is easier if it is assigned to the author of the patch. I hope you
don't mind.
PR17991 is still assi
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 06:54
---
Bruce, will you please take a look? It is pretty obvious but I do not want to
step over you.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-19 12:43
---
Fixed by the above patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-19 07:42
---
The fix is obvious, I misordered the two precedence in enum cp_parser_prec.
I'll commit it and add a testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18047
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-10-18 14:06:18 |2004-10-19 07:35:57
date|
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 08:00
---
Aaron, please check it now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17991
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 11:51
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg02540.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 11:48
---
First hunk of the attached patch was applied; the second is not related and the
behavior it disables was intended.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 11:46
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01173.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 08:58
---
Needs a configury maintainer. Bruce Korb said he's fine with it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17832
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 13:39
---
It only happens with -fdump-tree-all-all, which currently segfaults for me
independently of this bug. Anyway thanks for reminding me.
Will attach a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
301 - 380 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
