[Bug c/42046] New: missed optimization on ARM

Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc

[Bug c++/41933] New: internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have error_mark in build_lambda_object, at cp/semantics.c:5353

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-elf http

[Bug c++/41934] New: function parameter pack inaccessible inside lambda

inside lambda Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC host

[Bug c++/41933] internal compiler error: tree check: expected field_decl, have error_mark in build_lambda_object, at cp/semantics.c:5353

--- Comment #2 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2009-11-04 03:15 --- I filed Bug 41934, which may have related causes. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41933

[Bug lto/41902] Compile error in gcc/lto/lto-elf.c (SHN_XINDEX undeclared)

--- Comment #2 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2009-11-02 11:47 --- (In reply to comment #1) Works for me with both recent libelf and elfutils. The code didn't really change recently, so what libelf do you have installed? libelf-0.8.12 I think I understand what

[Bug c++/41920] New: Invalid 'unused parameter' warning for parameters used in lambdas

Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc

[Bug lto/41902] New: Compile error in gcc/lto/lto-elf.c (SHN_XINDEX undeclared)

Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41902

[Bug c++/38620] New: internal compiler error: in finish_decltype_type

ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38620

[Bug c++/38612] New: Vague error diagnostics for pointer-to-member type incompatibility

: 4.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38612

[Bug c++/38612] Vague error diagnostics for pointer-to-member type incompatibility

--- Comment #1 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2008-12-23 15:53 --- in the example the last comment should read // fails because Y is not derived from Base instead of // fails because Y is not derived from A -- bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com changed

[Bug c++/38612] Vague error diagnostics for pointer-to-member type incompatibility

--- Comment #2 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2008-12-24 00:48 --- Created an attachment (id=16977) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16977action=view) Broader test case for incomplete base and object types test1 shows the case where the base type

[Bug c++/38612] Vague error diagnostics for pointer-to-member type incompatibility

--- Comment #3 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2008-12-24 00:52 --- Created an attachment (id=16978) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16978action=view) proposed patch to gcc/cp/typeck2.c - changes type in error message from type to ptrmem_type

[Bug libstdc++/38596] New: tr1_impl/functional incompatible with -fno-rtti

ReportedBy: bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com GCC build triplet: mingw32 GCC host triplet: mingw32 GCC target triplet: arm-elf http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38596

[Bug libstdc++/38596] tr1_impl/functional incompatible with -fno-rtti

--- Comment #2 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2008-12-21 15:36 --- Basically my thoughts too. But I am not familiar enough with these headers to say that this is side-effect free, especially with all that SFINAE code. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libstdc++/38596] tr1_impl/functional incompatible with -fno-rtti

--- Comment #7 from bruck dot michael at googlemail dot com 2008-12-21 16:36 --- Thanks Paolo. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38596