--- Comment #14 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-07-25 19:23 ---
Okay, thanks for the fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42852
--- Comment #11 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-07-25 16:23 ---
Will this be applied to 4.5.1?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42852
--- Comment #2 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-06-24 18:08 ---
Thanks, I have notified the author.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44657
: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugs at 59A2 dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44657
--- Comment #1 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-01-27 13:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=19728)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19728&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42883
ponent: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugs at 59A2 dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42883
major
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugs at 59A2 dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42881
--- Comment #4 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-01-25 10:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So it's gfortran's fault you write non-portable code, and instead
> of dealing with it on your end, you think that gfortran developers
> should do the work to make your code
--- Comment #2 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2010-01-23 21:54 ---
> In other words, fix your code by putting an & in column 72.
This is not a solution since it makes it invalid fixed-form source:
Error: Syntax error in argument list at (1)
Not treating the char-73 & spec
ly a
continuation character is truncated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: bugs at 59A2 dot
--- Comment #4 from bugs at 59A2 dot org 2008-11-17 12:24 ---
There is no way to qualify an array type, but this sort of conversion is very
useful. For instance, the optimizer produces better code for
void foo(const double a[], int m, int n) {
const double (*b)[n] = (const double
11 matches
Mail list logo
