[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 --- Comment #7 from Carl Love --- I recently committed a patch to fix the counts. commit 5d336ae49528fde3904c9e5bfc83a450429b2961 Author: Carl Love Date: Fri Mar 10 18:16:52 2023 -0500 rs6000: Fix test int_128bit-runnable.c instruction

[Bug testsuite/101528] [11 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/int_128bit-runnable.c fails after r11-8743

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101528 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cel at us dot ibm.com --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c/108996] New: Proposal for adding DWARF call site information got GCC with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108996 Bug ID: 108996 Summary: Proposal for adding DWARF call site information got GCC with -O0 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/101022] rs6000: __builtin_altivec_vcmpequt expands to wrong pattern

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101022 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cel at us dot ibm.com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/98092] [11 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2315 (error: unrecognizable insn)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 --- Comment #2 from Carl Love --- Segher: Yup, I saw the buzilla. Will take a look at it. Carl On Fri, 2021-01-22 at 18:49 +, segher at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98092 > >

[Bug target/93449] PPC: Missing conversion builtin from vector to _Decimal128 and vice versa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93449 Carl Love changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cel at us dot ibm.com --- Comment #10 from