Keywords: wrong-debug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45717
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 12:51 ---
Note that this works fine on mainline and 4.3.x, 4.4.x
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 09:47 ---
Fixed by revision 164149
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 07:09 ---
Subject: Bug 0
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Jun 23 07:08:46 2010
New Revision: 161255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=161255
Log:
PR 0
* doc/install.texi: Update
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 07:11 ---
Doc updated.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 07:48 ---
Subject: Bug 0
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Jun 23 07:47:57 2010
New Revision: 161256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=161256
Log:
Replace PR 0 by PR ada/0.
Modified:
trunk/gcc
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 09:15 ---
Subject: Bug 44633
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Jun 23 09:14:55 2010
New Revision: 161264
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=161264
Log:
2010-06-23 Thomas Quinot qui...@adacore.com
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-23 09:15 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 09:36 ---
The bug is in your manual build procedure (the patch to
s-finimp.adb is a kludge that would only hide the wrong build procedure) which
is
bypassing the gnat toolset normal operations.
I would suggest using stand
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 08:21 ---
Sorry, but we still need a self contained set of sources attached in bugzilla
(with only the needed sources to reproduce the bug), and a single, stand alone
gcc command line with no extra shell scripts.
See http
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-22 18:42 ---
We only accept self contained reproducers, and preeferably with a straight gcc
command rather than levels of Makefiles/scripts on top of it.
So can you please file the needed files (and no more) as well
--- Comment #74 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-17 17:03
---
Marking as WONTFIX, as requested
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 15:08 ---
Feel free to submit a patch.
Note that middle-end warnings (such as -Wuninitialized) do not always support
properly all front-end semantics, in particular for high level languages such
as Ada, so I'd recommend
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-20 16:58 ---
Get_Page_Size should indeed now not be a dummy value and cannot be 0.
I'll take care of updating the comments in s-osinte*.ads when I get a chance
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41419
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 14:32 ---
remove 'ada' component
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 08:25 ---
Subject: Bug 17566
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Aug 10 08:25:05 2009
New Revision: 150617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=150617
Log:
2009-08-10 Vincent Celier cel...@adacore.com
PR ada
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-10 08:27 ---
Should now be fixed
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 09:11 ---
I guess you did not follow the build instructions properly: if you build a
cross
Ada compiler, you need to first build a matching native compiler from the
*same*
sources.
Here you are using an older base compiler
--- Comment #15 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-26 20:33
---
Right, my change fixed gnatmake so that it would call the proper gcc (based on
the
previous comments on this PR), but Makefiles have never supported
--program-suffix, so that's not even a regression.
Feel free
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-mingw32
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 12:20 ---
Are you using a 64 bit compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40837
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 13:10 ---
Interesting, thanks for the feedback. Let me double check a few things on
my side (testing various GCC versions).
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40837
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-23 15:02 ---
My confusion: I thought I had tested with GCC 4.5 but in fact I had used
GCC 4.3 which does not have the 'MINGW_ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK' macro (and
__enable_execute_stack symbol).
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-19 14:37 ---
This is now handled properly (has been for a long time actually).
In Ada 95 mode, the code is rejected:
test_306835.adb:9:04: instantiation error at line 5
test_306835.adb:9:04: aliased component type must
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-12 12:32 ---
Well, there's nothing we can do without a stand alone (if possible simplified)
reproducer.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-17 13:39 ---
Subject: Bug 35953
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Apr 17 13:39:10 2009
New Revision: 146267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=146267
Log:
2009-04-17 Thomas Quinot qui...@adacore.com
PR ada
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-17 13:41 ---
Fixed on trunk
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #23 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 06:37
---
Certainly, pa-hpux and ia64-hpux are two very different platforms as far as
GCC is concerned.
Also, yes, FSF GCC and GNAT Pro are two very different beasts with a different
list of supported/tested platforms
--- Comment #26 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-09 15:40
---
Is the (small amount of ?) code in Gnat Pro going to be available
(someday) for gcc Ada. That may fix these problems.
There's still confusion I'm afraid. GCC Ada is just an Ada compiler.
GNAT Pro is a complete
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-08 12:19 ---
Fixed now, sorry about that, I left out g-socket.ads
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-30 15:06 ---
I'm assuming the proper --disable switch is either already there, if not,
probably worth opening another PR. Keeping this PR as an enhancement request
to add support for x86_64 solaris for Ada.
--
charlet at gcc
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-07 09:39 ---
This is a bug in your base compiler, not in GCC 4.4.0.
See other past reports on this issue, where the bug was in the distributor
(Debian ?) compiler, and not in any official GCC releases.
Arno
--
charlet
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 09:28 ---
This was broken by the following change AFAICT (rev 121082):
2007-01-23 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR bootstrap/30541
* Makefile.def (flags_to_pass): Add GNATBIND and GNATMAKE
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 10:34 ---
Please submit a self contained bug report with all needed sources. Even better
would be a reduced test case, thanks.
Note that GPS sources have changed and no longer have the code you quote.
--
charlet at gcc
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-13 13:20 ---
Closing, we're not in the business of figuring out what's wrong with debian's
version of GCC :-)
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 08:56
---
Subject: Bug 864
Author: charlet
Date: Thu May 29 08:56:01 2008
New Revision: 136149
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=136149
Log:
PR ada/864
* osint.ads, osint.adb
--- Comment #11 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 08:59
---
Fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #12 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 09:04
---
Also a duplicate of PR864, which is now fixed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 864 ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-29 09:04
---
*** Bug 33857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-28 15:56 ---
Subject: Bug 34446
Author: charlet
Date: Wed May 28 15:55:41 2008
New Revision: 136111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=136111
Log:
2008-05-28 Vincent Celier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR ada
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-28 15:58 ---
Documentation has been updated, so closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-23 11:58 ---
This has been fixed already by Eric, rev 135797
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 12:38 ---
About to commit proper patch from Robert Dewar.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 12:44
---
Subject: Bug 24533
Author: charlet
Date: Tue May 20 12:43:59 2008
New Revision: 135614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=135614
Log:
2008-05-20 Arnaud Charlet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* s
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 12:45 ---
Subject: Bug 30740
Author: charlet
Date: Tue May 20 12:44:55 2008
New Revision: 135619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=135619
Log:
2008-05-20 Robert Dewar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR ada
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 12:50 ---
Subject: Bug 17985
Author: charlet
Date: Tue May 20 12:49:21 2008
New Revision: 135636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=135636
Log:
2008-05-20 Ed Schonberg [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-20 13:07 ---
Fixed.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 11:15 ---
--enable-threads=gnat is obsolete and will be removed as soon as someone
submits a patch to that effect. Your report simply shows that nobody is
using it these days (and use the default instead).
Arno
--- Comment #9 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 13:24 ---
I'm sorry, but I have an experimental patch (still needs some refining) fixing
PR864 which does also fix this PR, so I do not understand your comment, could
you
please elaborate ?
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #11 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 13:39
---
Right, as I said, this is exactly PR864 for which I have an experimental
patch which needs small refinements.
Arno
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 864 ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 13:39 ---
*** Bug 29127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864
--- Comment #9 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 13:40 ---
Assigning to myself.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 21:54 ---
Lowering severity
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:05 ---
This is not accessibility level which is computed here, but dynamic task
master level, in case your interface is a synchronized interface.
You can already use pragma Restrictions (No_Task_Hierarchy) if you do
--- Comment #20 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:19
---
This PR is puzzling and confused: the original issue (tests failing on some
platform) has been addressed.
The new issue which seem the be keeping this PR opened is the ability to
run ACATS tests using expect
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:26 ---
You do not need to build/install asis to use some of these commands, but
that does not make gnatcmd.adb wrong here.
In other words, you are assuming that gnatcmd.adb should only refer to
tools that come with GCC
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:31 ---
I'd suggest updating your patch to latest sources, and submit it to
gcc-patches, that's the standard procedure.
Also, it would be useful to have some kind of commitment from either
someone or from soem identified
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:34 ---
Well, I must be blind, but I do not see a bad location here: GNAT complains
at line 3 that the full declaration defined at line 4 must be tagged,
showing indeed the line where type T is declared as tagged.
Looks
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:35 ---
No information, not even a GCC version, so closing.
Please reopen once you have more info to feed.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:38 ---
Right, this is really as intended, to avoid too many false positives.
The warning circuitry is not prepared to handle more complex cases,
which would require really a different kind of tool, so is out of the scope
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:40 ---
No feedback. Note that I suspect GCC 4.3/4.4 build current polyorb fine,
so closing this PR.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #39 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:43
---
Fixed on trunk.
Patch pre-approved on active branches if deemed necessary.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:47 ---
There are really not enough info to guess what is going wrong for sure.
It is indeed likely the same as PR29127, so closing on that grounds.
Please give me info if you think this is a different issue, thanks.
Arno
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:47 ---
*** Bug 33820 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:49 ---
it's a testsuite/infrastructure issue rather than an Ada issue per se.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:54 ---
OK, classifying as an enhancement request, since there's no bug here, the error
message is correct.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:11
---
This PR seems to be addressed at this point.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:23 ---
It will install it only if it was built (there's an explicit test), and it
won't
build it for e.g. non vxworks, so things are fine here.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:26 ---
This is fixed on mainline, where a similar patch has been applied.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:35
---
After reviewing this ticket, I am coming to the conclusion that things
are working as expected now: due to major changes in the gcc directory
structure and makefiles, when you do a make, GCC will always build
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:42 ---
Turns out that this PR is the same as PR864
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 864 ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:42 ---
*** Bug 29127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 23:58 ---
Subject: Bug 31808
Author: charlet
Date: Mon May 12 23:58:11 2008
New Revision: 135239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=135239
Log:
PR ada/31808
* Makefile.in (gnattools-cross): Do not build
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-07 15:07 ---
Sorry, but this is a standard Ada 2005 pragma, documented in the Ada RM.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-12 19:09 ---
Subject: Bug 35917
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Apr 12 19:08:18 2008
New Revision: 134226
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134226
Log:
PR ada/35917
* s-linux-hppa.ads: Fix syntax errors
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-12 19:10 ---
Should now be fixed, let me know if not.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-10 06:21 ---
reopening
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-10 14:41 ---
You should probably report this to slackware then.
Note that you are not using gnat gpl in your report, but a very old GCC version
(3.3.6), so I'd suggest trying with a newer version, where things will
very likely
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 06:45 ---
missing debug info is never really major, since there are always work arounds
(like print statements).
Note that there is close to zero chance that someone will look into your .bz2
file,
let alone your README
--- Comment #23 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08 06:46
---
Subject: Bug 10768
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Apr 8 06:46:04 2008
New Revision: 134013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134013
Log:
2008-04-08 Tristan Gingold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR ada/10768
--- Comment #24 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-08 07:25
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-05 08:15 ---
closing
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug 33688
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Mar 26 07:34:57 2008
New Revision: 133545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133545
Log:
2008-03-26 Thomas Quinot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR ada/33688
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 07:58 ---
This PR should now be addressed, please reopen if not, clarifying what's
missing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 08:02 ---
Sounds like something specific to RTEMS, since I've never seen something like
that on any other platform.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 11:26 ---
Actually, we do not claim annex d conformance in GCC, so closing this PR,
since on linux (which is what this report is referring to), it does not make
sense to go to the hardware level.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-19 16:24 ---
Subject: Bug 15803
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Dec 19 16:24:34 2007
New Revision: 131079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131079
Log:
2007-12-19 Ed Schonberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary
--- Comment #3 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-19 16:25 ---
Subject: Bug 34149
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Dec 19 16:25:18 2007
New Revision: 131082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131082
Log:
2007-12-19 Gary Dismukes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR ada
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-19 16:26 ---
Subject: Bug 33688
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Dec 19 16:25:58 2007
New Revision: 131084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131084
Log:
2007-12-19 Thomas Quinot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Part
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 17:59 ---
Subject: Bug 15805
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Dec 13 17:59:09 2007
New Revision: 130903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130903
Log:
Restore part of patch lost for PR ada/15805:
* sem_ch3
--- Comment #10 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-08 17:52
---
removing myself from cc: since I'm subscribed to gcc-bugs
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 17:48 ---
closing
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #7 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-07 21:42 ---
Sam,
Could you point me to the message on gcc-patches submitting this
patch and to the approval message ? For some reason I cannot find it.
Arno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22559
--- Comment #8 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-21 13:49 ---
closing then.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-21 06:55 ---
This report is confused: range checking is enabled by default.
-gnato is about overflow checking, not range checking.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-28 15:34 ---
Marking this bug as fixed in 4.3
When you send a bug report, please try to reduce it to a simple gcc command
(and if possible with few sources showing the problem).
Having to deal with a large tarball and gnatmake
--- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 10:53 ---
GNAT GPL 2007 is not an FSF release.
Your code compiles fine with GCC 4.3.0
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:16 ---
Fixed in 4.2.1, so closing.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:24 ---
This is fixed in mainline.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-14 12:31 ---
Test case now compiles fine.
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
