[Bug fortran/53035] New: Internal Compiler Error

2012-04-18 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53035 Bug #: 53035 Summary: Internal Compiler Error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/45369] New: problem with the associate statement

2010-08-21 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369

[Bug fortran/45369] problem with the associate statement

2010-08-21 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-21 16:40 --- Created an attachment (id=21538) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21538action=view) code that allow the bug to be reproduced -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45369

[Bug fortran/45369] problem with the associate statement

2010-08-21 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-21 21:35 --- Subject: Re: problem with the associate statement Thank you very much. I use the associate construct a great deal; it can really clarify your code. Norm domob at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote

[Bug fortran/44857] [4.6 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996

2010-08-05 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #17 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-05 13:03 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996 Hello, Your fix worked fine, and I am now again able to build my application. Thanks again. Yours truly, Norm Norman S

[Bug fortran/44857] [4.6 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996

2010-08-04 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #15 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-04 14:18 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] ICE in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:4996 You're welcome. Thanks for your help. Norm burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote

[Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths

2010-08-03 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-08-03 10:24 --- Subject: Re: [F2003] allocatable character lengths Thank you very much for replying so promptly. I looked at the status page I didn't read it carefully enough. Regards, Norm Clerman burnus at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug fortran/45170] New: suspected bug in error generated by allocatable character array

2010-08-02 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170

[Bug fortran/45155] New: implemention of structure constructor override using a generic interface

2010-07-31 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45155

[Bug fortran/45092] New: internal compiler error regression bug in the latest trunk build of the gfortran compiler

2010-07-26 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45092

[Bug fortran/45092] internal compiler error regression bug in the latest trunk build of the gfortran compiler

2010-07-26 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-07-26 23:29 --- Subject: gfortran bug 45092 Hello, Attached is the file, bug8.tar.gz needed to recreate the problem described in bug 45092. Norm Clerman --- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2010-07-26 23:29

[Bug fortran/41389] problem compiling file

2009-09-20 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-09-20 23:28 --- Subject: Re: problem compiling file Thank you for your response. I would appreciate very much if you could you please supply me with a web site and the name of the particular version of binutils. Thanks for your

[Bug fortran/41389] New: problem compiling file

2009-09-17 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41389

[Bug fortran/41062] [4.4 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438

2009-08-29 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #11 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-08-29 12:14 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438 You're welcome. Works fine now. Norm Clerman pault at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote

[Bug fortran/41062] New: internal compiler error

2009-08-13 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
error Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/41062] internal compiler error

2009-08-13 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2009-08-13 20:52 --- Subject: Bug 41062 has been added to the database Hello everyone: gfortran bug 41062. Attached is a file that will allow you to reproduce bug 41062. Unzip the file, extract its contents, and invoke shell scipt bug7

[Bug fortran/38247] New: problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38247

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 14:37 --- Created an attachment (id=16757) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16757action=view) archive described in the initial bug report Pleas see initial bug report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #6 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:50 --- Created an attachment (id=16762) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16762action=view) updated, and corrected (I hope) archive hello, Sorry for the mixup on the archive. I've attached a new one

[Bug fortran/38247] problem with contained subprocedure.

2008-11-24 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 18:54 --- Subject: Re: problem with contained subprocedure. Hello, This appears to be the problem. In any case, I just submitted a new archive file. I hope this one's correct. Thanks for your help. Let me know when the fix has

[Bug fortran/38066] bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-23 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #9 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-24 02:18 --- Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference Mikael, Thank you for responding to this bug report, and please excuse my delay in replying. I have rewritten the code in question, and it now works fine. Thanks to everyone

[Bug fortran/38065] private/public confusion with a contained function

2008-11-11 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #11 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 14:35 --- Subject: Re: private/public confusion with a contained function Hello, Thank you for responding so promptly. Yes, I see what's going on now. It wasn't apparent to me that my function CreateLine was incorrectly

[Bug fortran/38066] bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-11 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 16:07 --- Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference Hello again, Thank you for writing. As I mentioned in my original bug report, I created this particular bug from my lens design program, which, as you know, contains much more

[Bug fortran/38065] private/public confusion with a contained function

2008-11-11 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 13:46 --- Subject: Re: private/public confusion with a contained function Hello, As best I can see, your reduction of the problem is not correct; in it subroutine S1 should be private, not public. Yours truly, Norm Clerman

[Bug fortran/38066] bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-11 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #5 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 23:19 --- Subject: Re: bug6 ambiguous reference Attached is a file that will allow you to reproduce the problem. Run the shell script bug6.sh. The error occurs in file mtfmodM.f90: mtfmodM.f90:2810.17: end module MTFMod

[Bug fortran/38066] bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-11 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #7 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-11 23:22 --- I have just sent an e-mail in response to your latest one. Attached to it is a file that will allow you to reproduce the problem. Thank you for your patience on this matter. Norm Clerman -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/38065] New: bug5

2008-11-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
-- Summary: bug5 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http

[Bug fortran/38065] bug5

2008-11-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 14:57 --- Subject: bug 38065 (my bug5) Attached is the file you will need to reproduce the problem. Thanks again for your assistance. Norm Clerman --- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 14:57

[Bug fortran/38066] New: bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38066

[Bug fortran/38066] bug6 ambiguous reference

2008-11-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 15:04 --- Created an attachment (id=16641) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16641action=view) see bug explanation -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38066

[Bug fortran/38065] bug5

2008-11-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-11-09 21:54 --- Subject: Re: bug5 Thank you for your prompt reply. I have reassembled all the files to reproduce the problem and they are in the attached file bug5a.tgz. My apologies for any problem this has caused. Norm Clerman

[Bug fortran/37445] New: incorrect error reported

2008-09-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37445

[Bug fortran/37445] incorrect error reported

2008-09-09 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-09-09 16:03 --- Subject: bug 37445 Hello, Attached is a compressed archive containing the files you will need to reproduce bug 37445. Unpack the file and then invoke the shell script bug4.sh to accomplish this. I see that when I

[Bug fortran/36590] New: internal error

2008-06-21 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36590

[Bug fortran/36590] internal error

2008-06-21 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #1 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-21 16:28 --- Subject: gfortran bug 36590 Hello, Attached is the zipped tar archive that will enable you to reproduce gfortran bug 36590. Unpack the archive in a directory and then invoke file bug3.sh to reproduce

[Bug fortran/36492] incorrect error when compiling

2008-06-20 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #8 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-20 20:32 --- Subject: Re: incorrect error when compiling Hello, I'm not sure if I mentioned in my original bug report that I'm downloading the trunk version for GNU/Linux for 64-bit AMD-compatible processors (x86_64) processors

[Bug fortran/36492] incorrect error when compiling

2008-06-12 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #2 from clerman at fuse dot net 2008-06-12 13:11 --- Subject: Re: incorrect error when compiling Hello, Thank you for your quick reply. Attached is an archive, bug2.tar. Unpack it and invoke the shell script bug2.sh. You should be able to reproduce the problem. The file

[Bug fortran/36492] New: incorrect error when compiling

2008-06-10 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36492

[Bug fortran/33529] New: problem with intrinsic function KIND

2007-09-22 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33529

[Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.

2007-09-22 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #3 from clerman at fuse dot net 2007-09-22 16:37 --- Subject: Re: error reported on correct initialization code. burnus, Thank you for your very prompt reply. I tried version 4.3.0; the bug does not exist in it. Using this version I have located a new bug

[Bug fortran/33513] error reported on correct initialization code.

2007-09-22 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
--- Comment #4 from clerman at fuse dot net 2007-09-22 16:37 --- Subject: Re: error reported on correct initialization code. kargl, Thanks for your very prompt reply. burnus also replied to my bug suggesting I try version 4.3.0. I did that, and the bug is not present

[Bug fortran/33513] New: error reported on correct initialization code.

2007-09-20 Thread clerman at fuse dot net
Version: 4.2.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: clerman at fuse dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33513