[Bug tree-optimization/78071] -Os -ffast-math generates pow() for 1/(x*x)

2016-10-21 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78071 --- Comment #2 from Chris King --- Created attachment 39867 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39867=edit suboptimal output with -Os -ffast-math

[Bug tree-optimization/78071] -Os -ffast-math generates pow() for 1/(x*x)

2016-10-21 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78071 --- Comment #1 from Chris King --- Created attachment 39866 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39866=edit Expected output

[Bug tree-optimization/78071] New: -Os -ffast-math generates pow() for 1/(x*x)

2016-10-21 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: colanderman at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39865 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39865=edit source code The expression 1/(x*x) (where x is a double or fl

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #2 from Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com --- If you don't want proposed patches attached to bug reports, then I suggest you remove the text proposed patch which is next to the Add an attachment link.

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #4 from Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com --- Sorry, not interested: like I said above, it's very difficult to trigger, and the only code I've been able to trigger it with is proprietary. You can either read sched-deps.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/57970] segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-11-10 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970 --- Comment #5 from Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com --- Would a unit test case be acceptable? That should be an easy way to evince this bug and I'd be glad to write one.

[Bug other/57970] New: segfault in sched-deps.c

2013-07-24 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: colanderman at gmail dot com Created attachment 30546 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30546action=edit Patch Symptom: Segfault in sched-deps.c when compiling a large auto-generated C file: ==3363== Invalid read of size 8 ==3363

[Bug middle-end/14192] Restrict pointers don't help

2013-06-26 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14192 Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||colanderman

[Bug c/55830] inline and __attribute__((always_inline)) treated differently for unused-function warning

2013-02-28 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55830 Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/55360] [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory

2012-11-19 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360 --- Comment #2 from Chris King colanderman at gmail dot com 2012-11-19 18:47:39 UTC --- Possibly, though I doubt it. PR 28831 has more to do with eliding copies of the struct in its entirety; the problem I'm having centers around accessing

[Bug rtl-optimization/55360] New: [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory

2012-11-16 Thread colanderman at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360 Bug #: 55360 Summary: [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack needlessly writes to and reads from memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2