https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78071
--- Comment #2 from Chris King ---
Created attachment 39867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39867&action=edit
suboptimal output with -Os -ffast-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78071
--- Comment #1 from Chris King ---
Created attachment 39866
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39866&action=edit
Expected output
: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colanderman at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39865
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39865&action=edit
source code
The expression 1/(x*x) (where x is a do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #5 from Chris King ---
Would a unit test case be acceptable? That should be an easy way to evince
this bug and I'd be glad to write one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #4 from Chris King ---
Sorry, not interested: like I said above, it's very difficult to trigger, and
the only code I've been able to trigger it with is proprietary.
You can either read sched-deps.c and understand the code path which f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57970
--- Comment #2 from Chris King ---
If you don't want proposed patches attached to bug reports, then I suggest you
remove the text "proposed patch" which is next to the "Add an attachment" link.
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colanderman at gmail dot com
Created attachment 30546
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30546&action=edit
Patch
Symptom: Segfault in sched-deps.c when compiling a large auto-generated C file:
==3363== Invalid read of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14192
Chris King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colanderman at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55830
Chris King changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colanderman at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360
--- Comment #2 from Chris King 2012-11-19
18:47:39 UTC ---
Possibly, though I doubt it. PR 28831 has more to do with eliding copies of
the struct in its entirety; the problem I'm having centers around accessing
individual elements. If PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55360
Bug #: 55360
Summary: [TileGX] Passing structure by value on stack
needlessly writes to and reads from memory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
11 matches
Mail list logo