https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #19 from Gianfranco ---
looks like branch 14 is not FTBFS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #18 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 57159
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57159&action=edit
unreduced testcase
// works: /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -fopenmp
-ffast-math
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 56672
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56672&action=edit
reproduce test cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #14 from Gianfranco ---
Hello, any news for this issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #10 from Gianfranco ---
$ gcc -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -fopenmp -ffast-math
-fexpensive-optimizations testcase.i -c
This is the minimal cmdline to trigger the issue I could find.
cat testcase.i
typedef struct {
int width
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #9 from Gianfranco ---
/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/13/cc1 -quiet -imultiarch aarch64-linux-gnu
-D _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D NDEBUG -isystem -dumpbase -mbranch-protection=standard
-mtune=generic -mlittle-endian -mabi=lp64 -g -g -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #8 from Gianfranco ---
reduced testcase:
typedef struct {
int width
} dt_bilateral_t;
typedef dt_aligned_pixel_t[4];
#pragma omp declare simd
void dt_bilateral_splat(dt_bilateral_t *b) {
int oy = b;
float *buf;
long offsets[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #7 from Gianfranco ---
I'm reducing it, 8.2%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #6 from Gianfranco ---
@Andrew, can you please get it from the build log?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable&arch=arm64&ver=4.4.2-1%2Bb1&stamp=1696847922&raw=0
there are the === BEGIN GCC DUMP === and === END
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
Gianfranco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|MOVED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111677
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
Thanks, Debian syncs the branch fixes from time to time,
last time was up to
* Update to git 20230913 from the gcc-13 branch.
Indeed, I requested to sync again sources.
thanks!
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 56038
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56038&action=edit
build log and dump
Hello, according t
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46734&action=edit
preprocessed sources and log file
I'm attaching the log ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
Gianfranco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #11 from Gianfranco ---
I would avoid an OOM issue, because even trying to compile a single file makes
it fail...
I'm trying again the same build with updated gcc and I'll report back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #6 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 44485
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44485&action=edit
another failing output
I'm attaching another file suffering from the same issue (mostly every cpp file
has this fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #5 from Gianfranco ---
working one:
/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/libexec/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/9/lto-wrapper
Target: arm-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #4 from Gianfranco ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> can you please provide the output of the gcc -v command so we can see what
> GCC configuration you're using
Sorry! I was going to attach it, but forgot :)
gcc -v
Using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 44480
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44480&action=edit
preprocessed source with buggy gcc-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86815
--- Comment #1 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 44479
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44479&action=edit
working preprocessed-source with gcc-9 snapshot
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
I got the ICE while compiling armhf code, I'm attaching the preprocessed source
to this bug report.
This happens with the new gcc 8.2, and it works with previous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
--- Comment #7 from Gianfranco ---
Now with gcc using rev 253388 everything is working again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
--- Comment #4 from Gianfranco ---
Tested with r253234
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-7/7.2.0-7ubuntu4
same issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
I did add some info on the duplicate bug, I reduced the regression in a bunch
of commits (and a two days range).
cc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Hello, as said, since patches added in 20-09 and 21-09 I am getting an ICE on
i386 with valid code from llvm-toolchain-3.8
(copy-pasted from my Ubuntu report
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 39733
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39733&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #1 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 39732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39732&action=edit
s file
: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
As said, mame on arm64 is not building anymore in Debian unstable, since the
gcc-6 switch.
According to Matthias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
--- Comment #16 from Gianfranco ---
thanks a lot for the help! with this we will finally finish ocaml and llvm
Debian transitions :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
--- Comment #1 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 36526
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36526&action=edit
crash log
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Hi, some regression has happened between
* Update to SVN 20150903 (r227431, 5.2.1) from the gcc-5-branch.
and
* Update to SVN 20151003 (r228449, 5.2.1) from the gcc-5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66438
--- Comment #4 from Gianfranco ---
The problem actually is Debian has gcc-4.9 as default compiler, and the
libstdc++ provided in testing is from gcc-5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #15 from Gianfranco ---
Thanks to all for the suggestions! Apparently this is what I presumed from the
begin (I read a lot about ABI changes in gcc-5)
I'll try to figure out with doko what is the best approach for fixing this!
thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #8 from Gianfranco ---
Thanks to you Markus, I spent almost one entire week in removing code in order
to have something "useful" for you, and this is the maximum I could achieve.
I don't know how much I can help you, your build failu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #6 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 35662
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35662&action=edit
"Reduced" testcase
I tried in the last few days to reduce as much as possible the testcase.
I really hope it is en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #5 from Gianfranco ---
I'm still trying to provide what requested, as you can see there
I'm working right now on it
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=casablanca&suite=experimental
however it is not trivial by me :)
plea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
Gianfranco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66262
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
I mentioned a testcase in the Debian bug report.
Unfortunately I'm not the upstream developer, I might find difficult to extract
what you exactly need...
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Target Milestone: ---
Hi, sorry in advance for the low quality bug report.
I'm reporting this upstream, since I suspect th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693
Gianfranco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693
--- Comment #10 from Gianfranco ---
Hi @Markus, I'm *really* impressed about your efficiency.
I reported the progresses on the vbox official mail list, thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693
--- Comment #8 from Gianfranco ---
Nope, I can build on debian (I'm the maintainer BTW) with 4.9 successfully.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=virtualbox&arch=amd64&ver=4.3.26-dfsg-1&stamp=1426696248
for now I forced gcc-4.9 as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693
Gianfranco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65693
--- Comment #1 from Gianfranco ---
Created attachment 35252
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35252&action=edit
log with -Wall -Wextra -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Created attachment 35251
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35251&action=edit
snip of the build log
I can't build anymor
45 matches
Mail list logo
