--- Comment #8 from dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
2005-10-06 03:28 ---
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: [4.0 Regression] 2D array initialization
with reshape
Sorry, I'm away just now. I'll be back in the office on
Tuesday 11th October 2005
and will
--- Additional Comments From dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
2005-09-26 08:04 ---
Subject: Re: SIZE() matters?
Accepted,
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20406
--- Additional Comments From dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
2005-09-22 22:01 ---
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: SIZE() matters?
Sorry, I'm away just now. I'll be back in the office on
Monday 26th September 2005
and will read your message then.
If the
Segmentation fault in RESHAPE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dave dot offiler at metoffic
--- Additional Comments From dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
2005-06-09 21:53 ---
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: SIZE() matters?
Sorry, I'm away just now. I'll be back in the office on
Monday 13th June 2005
and will read your message then.
If the matter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dave dot offiler at metoffice dot gov dot uk
CC: gcc
