[Bug c/56599] very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 --- Comment #6 from Dave 2013-03-11 18:46:35 UTC --- Created attachment 29644 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29644 second offending program Compiler error output for this one puts the error in stdio.h: In file in

[Bug c/56599] very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 --- Comment #5 from Dave 2013-03-11 18:44:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29643 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29643 first offending program The compiler error output is as follows: dlt8.c:7:22: error: expected ',' o

[Bug c/56599] very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 --- Comment #4 from Dave 2013-03-11 18:42:41 UTC --- It looks as though it threw away everything I'd typed in when I added an attachment, & then submitted the empty report. gcc produced extremely confusing error messages, referencing pe

[Bug c/56599] very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 --- Comment #3 from Dave 2013-03-11 18:34:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29642 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29642 preprocesser output for second program

[Bug c/56599] very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 --- Comment #2 from Dave 2013-03-11 18:32:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29641 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29641 preprocesser output for first program

[Bug c/56599] New: very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part)

2013-03-11 Thread davecat49 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56599 Bug #: 56599 Summary: very confusing compiler diagnostics (for stupid bug on my part) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCON