https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046
--- Comment #6 from Dave Johansen ---
Could that be made a guarantee? Right now, having to build plugins against the
full version of GCC is a major pain for distributions and saying that GCC
plugins are API/ABI stable for a major version would el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79046
--- Comment #3 from Dave Johansen ---
What are the chances that either of those changes will make it into the 7
release?
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: davejohansen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40493
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40493&action=edit
gcc patch for version from Open
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #19 from Dave Johansen ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dave Johansen from comment #17)
> > (In reply to kargl from comment #16)
> > > See the fortran@ mailinglist archive. Fritz posted a patch against
> > > 4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #17 from Dave Johansen ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #16)
> See the fortran@ mailinglist archive. Fritz posted a patch against
> 4.8 branch.
Are the patches that were posted against 6.0?
> That patch will never be committed t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226
--- Comment #14 from Dave Johansen ---
Are the patches for 4.8 available or can they be made available? I would like
to make a Software Collection (SCL) of version of 4.8 with these patches so it
could be used on RHEL 6/7 without having to jump t
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: davejohansen at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36985&action=edit
Example code to demonstrat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
--- Comment #14 from Dave Johansen ---
Could you please point me to how I can reproduce the issue with "RTLD_LOCAL
with multiple loaded objects depending on the same library"? I would like to
see if I can reproduce that issue with clang++ and icp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
--- Comment #11 from Dave Johansen ---
Can this please be reopened? It was determined in the glibc bugzilla that this
is a gcc problem because of the incorrect setting of unique flag.
