[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #15 from Deepthi H --- We fixed the testcase that linaro complained about the previous patch. We tested thoroughly the updated patch in-house and sent the patch to gcc mailing list. Please find the link below: https://gcc.gnu.org/pi

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #13 from Deepthi H --- Test logs :: :~/$ big_100k_var=$(printf "%0*d" 10 0) Host gcc binary (Without fix):: :~/$ gcc a.c -DA=$big_100k_var -DB=$big_100k_var gcc: fatal error: cannot execute ‘/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/cc

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #12 from Deepthi H --- As suggested, we made the necessary changes and updated the patch to gcc community. Please find the link below: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/656073.html

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #10 from Deepthi H --- As suggested, We've updated the patch to place the arguments in a file instead of passing it from an env variable. When the COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS is <128kb the env variable is used and when the size >128kb argume

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #9 from Deepthi H --- Created attachment 58212 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58212&action=edit With_Files_Workaround_for_GCC_ArgumentLongList

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #7 from Deepthi H --- We've a solution for this issue. When gcc/g++ is called using the @response-file.rsp syntax, gcc should forward the argument to its subprocesses. Previously the files were expanded which could lead to excessive

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #6 from Deepthi H --- Created attachment 58107 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58107&action=edit workaround for gcc driver long argument list error

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 --- Comment #4 from Deepthi H --- I have been investigating this issue further. Hence checking the source code and debugging the gcc sources. However, I wasn't able to find where the COLLECT_GCC_OPTION has been set to 128kb I couldn't find it b

[Bug driver/111527] COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS option hits single-variable limits too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111527 Deepthi H changed: What|Removed |Added CC||deepadeepthi98 at gmail dot com --- Comment