[Bug fortran/24404] Poor Error Description, bad error order

2005-10-16 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #1 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-17 02:43 --- Created an attachment (id=10006) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10006&action=view) test case that generates the errors -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24404

[Bug fortran/24404] New: Poor Error Description, bad error order

2005-10-16 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: denney at seas dot upenn dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24404

[Bug fortran/24398] gfortran tries to parse a comment in a module

2005-10-15 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #6 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-16 01:40 --- Perhaps a better error message than Fatal Error: Reading module numberlists at line 3 column 4: Bad name would be Fatal Error: Reading module numberlists at line 3 column 4: Bad name (perhaps not a compiled

[Bug fortran/24398] gfortran tries to parse a comment in a module

2005-10-15 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #4 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-16 01:26 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Can you attach the .f90 file which contains the module numberlists? > You're too quick for me. I was in the process of attaching it. It's there now. -- ht

[Bug fortran/24398] gfortran tries to parse a comment in a module

2005-10-15 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #2 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-16 01:15 --- Created an attachment (id=9997) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9997&action=view) Error where line 4 is a comment -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24398

[Bug fortran/24398] gfortran tries to parse a comment in a module

2005-10-15 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #1 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-16 01:14 --- Created an attachment (id=9996) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9996&action=view) no errors in this source, but it uses the module -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24398

[Bug fortran/24398] New: gfortran tries to parse a comment in a module

2005-10-15 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
ONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: denney at seas dot upenn dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24398

[Bug fortran/24286] Unclassifiable statement when using pointer subroutine

2005-10-09 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #4 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-09 17:00 --- Created an attachment (id=9946) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9946&action=view) Fixed version of code using call, nullify, etc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24286

[Bug fortran/24286] Unclassifiable statement when using pointer subroutine

2005-10-09 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #3 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-09 16:59 --- With this fixed code, the initial test case now compiles correctly in the windows version. (It segfaults on running, but that's my coding problem, not a compiler problem. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug fortran/24286] Unclassifiable statement when using pointer subroutine

2005-10-09 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
--- Comment #1 from denney at seas dot upenn dot edu 2005-10-09 16:32 --- Created an attachment (id=9945) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9945&action=view) Initial test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24286

[Bug fortran/24286] New: Unclassifiable statement when using pointer subroutine

2005-10-09 Thread denney at seas dot upenn dot edu
ter subroutine Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: denney at seas dot upenn dot edu http://gcc.gnu.