http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Expected diagnostic "reference to
'type' is ambiguous" not given for function-local
static declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #9 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-03
08:40:28 UTC ---
Great. That's got rid of the need for the preprocessor hacks to remove
constexpr usage from libstdc++ in c++0x mode. A full build of our tree from
GCC 4.6 HEAD (including unmodified l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #3 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-02
16:30:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> Rolling back to my previous HEAD reveals that the reduced example above still
> fails whereas the code I was originally trying to build worked. So obvious
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
Summary: [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent
declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build
assertion failure.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #7 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-01
15:34:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Yep, this is fixed too.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46472 ***
>
The attached program demonstrated instances of the bug with variou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47783
Summary: Warning 'set but not used'
[-Wunused-but-set-parameter] incorrectly issued for
update through reference wrapper
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23369|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #1 from Adam Butcher 2011-02-16
23:03:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23369
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23369
Various declarations and constexpr specifications demonstrating problem --
runnable as sh script
Adde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Summary: [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when
template instantiation causes ctor to not satify
constexpr requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42603
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6709
Adam Butcher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
14 matches
Mail list logo