[Bug c++/48046] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Expected diagnostic "reference to 'type' is ambiguous" not given for function-local static declaration

2011-03-09 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] Expected diagnostic "reference to 'type' is ambiguous" not given for function-local static declaration Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 S

[Bug c++/47950] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build assertion failure.

2011-03-03 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47774] [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-03-03 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 --- Comment #9 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-03 08:40:28 UTC --- Great. That's got rid of the need for the preprocessor hacks to remove constexpr usage from libstdc++ in c++0x mode. A full build of our tree from GCC 4.6 HEAD (including unmodified l

[Bug c++/47950] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build assertion failure.

2011-03-02 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950 --- Comment #3 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-02 16:30:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Rolling back to my previous HEAD reveals that the reduced example above still > fails whereas the code I was originally trying to build worked. So obvious

[Bug c++/47950] [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build assertion failure.

2011-03-02 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot

[Bug c++/47950] New: [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build assertion failure.

2011-03-02 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950 Summary: [C++0x] Internal compiler error: non-dependent declaration as condition causes tsubst_copy_and_build assertion failure. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status

[Bug c++/47774] [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-03-01 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 --- Comment #7 from Adam Butcher 2011-03-01 15:34:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Yep, this is fixed too. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46472 *** > The attached program demonstrated instances of the bug with variou

[Bug c++/47783] New: Warning 'set but not used' [-Wunused-but-set-parameter] incorrectly issued for update through reference wrapper

2011-02-17 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47783 Summary: Warning 'set but not used' [-Wunused-but-set-parameter] incorrectly issued for update through reference wrapper Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug c++/47774] [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-02-17 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org See Als

[Bug c++/47774] [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-02-17 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23369|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/47774] [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-02-16 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 --- Comment #1 from Adam Butcher 2011-02-16 23:03:22 UTC --- Created attachment 23369 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23369 Various declarations and constexpr specifications demonstrating problem -- runnable as sh script Adde

[Bug c++/47774] New: [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements

2011-02-16 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774 Summary: [C++0x] constexpr specifier on ctor not ignored when template instantiation causes ctor to not satify constexpr requirements Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 S

[Bug c++/42603] [C++0x] decltype not supported for parent class specifier

2011-01-20 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42603 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot

[Bug c++/6709] [DR743] decltype cannot be used with the :: operator

2011-01-20 Thread dev.lists at jessamine dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6709 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot