https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #19 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Sorry for the delay here, the machine I have access to is quite slow.
It spent ~2 days building unmodified git master and is now running the
testsuite as baseline...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111709
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #11 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 58549 [details]
> > Proposed patch
>
> Can someone please regression test the attached pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #6 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
for reference...
crossdev ~/bisection/gcc # git bisect log
git bisect start
# status: waiting for both good and bad commits
# good: [c042baa99ef0cb1c1711cd913822ce1e7354f144] testsuite, Darwin: Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #4 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Here's what cvise came up with as minimal test case.
1) compile command:
alpha-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -c -fno-strict-overflow -Wsign-compare -mieee
-DNDEBUG -mieee -pipe -O2 -mcpu=ev4 -fwrapv -std=c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #1 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Created attachment 58453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58453&action=edit
preprocessed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #2 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Created attachment 58454
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58454&action=edit
assembler source file
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dilfridge at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling Python 3.12.4 on Gentoo for alpha fails with the following message:
alpha-unknown-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112897
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111406
--- Comment #4 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
> So I think this isn't an issue unless you try to build libiberty stand-alone
> or as part of binutils and also install it?
>
We have a binutils-libs p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111406
--- Comment #2 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Indeed, sorry
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=libiberty/Makefile.in#l388
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dilfridge at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
This is a clone of https://bugs.gentoo.org/913750
With CC=clang, the build of libiberty (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #9 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #8)
> Created attachment 51076 [details]
> full build log, xz-compressed
^ Build log for a failure with
* --host=riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu
* --t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90419
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46379|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90419
--- Comment #5 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Created attachment 46379
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46379&action=edit
patch: disable 32bit riscv abis in gcc multilib
OK thanks. This is roughly what I suspected.
Not for ups
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90419
--- Comment #3 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #2)
> I talked to Palmer. Apparently what you want to do is build multilibs for
> lp64 and lp64d, to test the linux multilib support. That isn't currently
> support
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dilfridge at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Right now, building a multilib compiler for riscv64 / glibc gives you two
options:
1) Enable multilib, no further specifications
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84377
--- Comment #2 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
>
> but it doesn't fail for me, does it for you?
Yes it fails here.
(~amd64 chroot) pinacolada ~/test # gcc -m32 -O2 -std=gnu11 -fgnu89-inline
-fno-strict-aliasing -frounding-math -fstack-protector
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dilfridge at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43411
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43411&action=edit
preprocessed source
I stumbled on this when trying to tra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
--- Comment #37 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Created attachment 42140
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42140&action=edit
gparted build log
Here's the build log from my Gentoo colleague.
If you need more, please tell me precis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
--- Comment #35 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Oops sorry, that should have been:
According to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629342 *not* fixed for
gcc-6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org
25 matches
Mail list logo
