https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It is specific functionality that has not yet been implemented for 64 bit AIX.
It works for 32 bit AIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is the exception throw inside the constructor?
Are saying that the linking a file with a function defined with __attribute__
(constructor) causes the failure solely because the file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from Perzl.org
/ oss4aix.org and GCC trunk from a few days ago. I compiled both 32 bit
(default) and 64 bit (-maix64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Exceptions had been working. There is no wholesale failure of exceptions in the
G++ testsuite. I also don't know why you are defining macros for Linux and
AMD, or why you think
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc -O1 gcc.dg/noncompile/920507-1.c
internal compiler error: in symtab_get_node, at cgraph.h:1154
(gdb) run -O1 920507-1.c
Starting program: /tmp/20140626/gcc/cc1 -O1 920507-1.c
x
Analyzing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61630
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Revision 211600 causes GCC Bootstrap to fail on AIX in stage 2. The gen*
programs built by the stage 1 compiler all hang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61524
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
The ipa visibility patch introduces a massive number of new testsuite failures
on AIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61525
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61516
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |cris-axis-elf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61300
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #25 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for tracking this down. I will test it as well. AIX is a very good
canary for these types of bugs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #27 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The GCC 4.9 branch bootstraps with the patch for me. I'm running the testsuite
now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57836
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The affect of deligitimize_address on storing constants in the TOC vs
materializing inline was unintentional, but my JIT experiments on POWER7 did
not show a bad performance affect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) print debug_cgraph_node(node)
__builtin_unreachable/1630 (void __builtin_unreachable()) @700099c0
Type: function
Visibility: external public visibility_specified artificial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #21 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32770
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32770action=edit
full cgraph dump gzipped
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am not aware of any specific workaround. I assume that if you could avoid the
function pointer, you would. G++ exception handling implementation on AIX is
fragile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 32761
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32761action=edit
Pre-processed file that causes ICE
The pre-processed file crashes both 4.9 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
#0 _Z11fancy_abortPKciS0_ (
file=0x11dc62b8 gt_ggc_r_gt_cp_method_h+94056
/home/dje/src/gcc/gcc/vec.h, line=735, function=0x11dc62e0
gt_ggc_r_gt_cp_method_h+94096 operator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
3153 gcc_checking_assert (true_predicate_p
((*info-entry)[0].predicate));
(gdb) print info
$1 = (inline_summary *) 0x704970f8
(gdb) print info-entry
$2 = (vec *) 0x0
(gdb) print
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) print node-name()
$37 = 0x303f2768 void __builtin_unreachable()
(gdb) print *edge
$32 = {count = 0, caller = 0x70460a80, callee = 0x700099c0, prev_caller = 0x0,
next_caller
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Are you using GNU Bash as your SHELL (recommended in the target-specific
installation instructions). It should not take that long to bootstrap GCC on a
recent system. AIX /bin/sh runs
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
The rs6000 port should use divde to implement GCC named pattern divmodtidi4 and
divdeu to for udivmodtidi4. Similarly, divwe and divweu can implement
divmoddisi4 and udivmoddisi4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61030
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I reproduced the failure starting with both GCC 4.6.3 and GCC 4.8.1.
However, I am seeing some very strange results:
r209278 built in /tmp/20140412 SUCCESS
r209300 (trunk before
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Torbjorn: could you try building in a different directory, e.g.,
/builds/MMDD for the date or some random number?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have been bootstrapping GCC trunk and 4.9 on AIX 7.1 without any failures.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1 |powerpc-ibm-aix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
731 templatetypename T, typename A
732 inline T
733 vecT, A, vl_embed::operator[] (unsigned ix)
734 {
735 gcc_checking_assert (ix m_vecpfx.m_num);
736
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-aix64 |powerpc64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This already is fixed in 4.9.0. I am unsure which patch actually fixed the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60939
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 |powerpc-ibm-aix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Gentlemen, I really do not understand this discussion.
I used the term crude and receive a response that it is not crude, but it is
dangerous. WTF? Why is anyone trying to sell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763
--- Comment #16 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment on attachment 32568
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32568
Patch with changelog and comment.
Okay. Thanks for the clarification.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can see why the proposed patch will work, but it seems a little heavy-handed.
This case isn't something that simplify_gen_subreg() should handle?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60763
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not questioning the analysis, I'm questioning the solution. Directly
generating a register and jamming in the REGNO in this pattern seems sort of
crude.
gen_rtx_REG (DImode, REGNO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378
--- Comment #13 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I mis-remembered the bug. This is a problem with branch distance. The GNU
Assembler, GNU Linker and GOLD allow instruction relaxation that creates long
branch stubs for far branches
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Recent releases of GCC are built with linker options to allow larger data
section. Are the user process limits (ulimit) set large enough? One could
rebuild GCC cc1 and cc1plus with even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46481
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
--- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Jan 11 18:57:56 2014
New Revision: 206554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206554root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/58115
* config/rs6000/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57386
--- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Mike, can you apply the patch to the 4.8 branch?
Thanks, David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33704
--- Comment #23 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Nov 23 15:38:07 2013
New Revision: 205309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205309root=gccview=rev
Log:
libgcc:
PR target/33704
* config/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59208
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/libgcov.c: In function 'gcov_exit':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libgcc/libgcov.c:827:1: internal compiler error: in
up
date_costs_from_allocno, at ira-color.c:1334
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58933
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Thu Oct 24 12:53:51 2013
New Revision: 204009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204009root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-10-23 David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Wed Oct 23 14:32:32 2013
New Revision: 203977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203977root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/58838
* config/rs6000/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: rs6000.md
===
--- rs6000.md (revision 203930)
+++ rs6000.md (working copy)
@@ -2699,7 +2699,7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31071
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31071action=edit
Disable mullw. dot form in 64 bit mode
Revised patch that also disables splitters.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58838
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/home/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-11.C: In instantiation
of 'struct Oint::I':
/home/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-11.C:17:16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch solves the regression in my recent bootstrap (testresults sent to
mailinglist).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58206
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
AIX Bootstrap is severely broken sometime after revision 201843. There are an
overwhelming number of linker errors. I am trying to bisect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58206
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libobjc/accessors.m: In function 'objc_getProperty':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libobjc/accessors.m:127:11: internal compiler error:
in obj_type_ref_class, at tree.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58179
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
void tightness3_intrinsics2(double* A, double* B, int N) {
__vector double * vA = (__vector double*)A;
__vector double * vB = (__vector double*)B;
__vector double va0, va1;
double b0, b1, b2, b3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58139
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00092.html
This patch caused new testsuite regressions:
FAIL: g++.dg/ipa/devirt-11.C -std=gnu++98 scan-ipa-dump-times inline
Discovered a virtual call
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58094
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58094
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30620
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30620action=edit
ipa and tree dumps
-fdump-ipa-all -fdump-tree-all output file attached in gzipped tar file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58096
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
In file included from
/tmp/20130801/powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/
debug/safe_sequence.h:34:0,
from
/nasfarm/edelsohn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58049
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58034
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58034
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I wonder if this is due to _setjmp not being marked as return twice.
Is that a missing decoration in the GLIBC declaration?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56787
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Uniquization of constants |[4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
A patch to improve uniquization of constants at the tree level broke alignment
of constants and vectorized copies.
gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-vector-memcpy.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The change caused a testcase failure, which was not investigated. I don't
understand the comment questionable optimization patterns. Optimizing for
size should be controlled by -Os.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19448
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57687
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57652
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Priority: P3
Component: driver
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
The 2011-05-19 change to convert collect2 to use the common diagnostics
infrastructure broke collect2's handling of temporary files. The original
error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57652
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57652
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Prototype patch to use atexit.
PR driver/57652
* collect2.c (collect_atexit): New.
(collect_exit): Directly call exit.
(main): Register collect_atexit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, the patch seems to fix the testsuite failure.
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Symtab cleanups 2/17 introduces 45 new failures in libstdc++ testsuite on AIX.
#0
_Z20ipa_record_referenceP15symtab_node_defS0_11ipa_ref_useP18gimple_statement_d
(referring_node=0x70d3ad58
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 30240
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30240action=edit
preprocessed testsuite/20_util/allocator_traits/members/construct.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Unoptimized backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1056d054 in _ZN7va_heap7reserveIP7ipa_refEEvRP3vecIT_S_8vl_embedEjb (
v=@0x24: 0x0, reserve=1, exact
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The failure occurs with or without -O1/-O2. I am invoking cc1plus with
-g -std=gnu++0x
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
/tmp/20130524/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../xg++
-B/tmp/20130524/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../
/nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/altivec-cell-2
801 - 900 of 1155 matches
Mail list logo
