[Bug c++/61135] It seems to be not able to call virtual method of literal object in lambda expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61135 --- Comment #4 from Dinar Temirbulatov --- I could not reproduce the error, the output looks correct on trunk

[Bug middle-end/55595] [google] r172952 (LIPO) broke profiledbootstrap on google/main, and later in google/gcc-4_7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55595 Dinar Temirbulatov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com

[Bug bootstrap/57486] bootstrap fails on 4.8 and google/4.8 branch on RHEL6.1 platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57486 --- Comment #3 from Dinar Temirbulatov --- Hello, Richard. I have got this error with gcc-4.8.x-google branch under the RedHat based system. Here is command-line to reproduce the error: g++ -c graphite.i -o graphite.o -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O2

[Bug bootstrap/57486] bootstrap fails on 4.8 and google/4.8 branch on RHEL6.1 platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57486 Dinar Temirbulatov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/57268] [4.9 Regression] c nested loops hang compiler in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57268 --- Comment #4 from Dinar Temirbulatov --- proposed fix posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01713.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/57268] [4.9 Regression] c nested loops hang compiler in sched-deps.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57268 Dinar Temirbulatov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com

[Bug c/57004] False warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57004 Dinar Temirbulatov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot

[Bug c++/56996] New: no warning on using extern "C" in namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996 Bug #: 56996 Summary: no warning on using extern "C" in namespace Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/49423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #16 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-10-11 09:11:27 UTC --- this regression after PR43137, also absence of pool range predicates for arm_zero_extendqisi2, arm_zero_extendqisi2_v6, arm_zero_extendhisi2, arm_zero_extendhisi2_v6 cause

[Bug target/49423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #15 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-09-26 15:38:33 UTC --- here is command and flags to reproduce the second testcase on 4.6 and 4.7 : cc1plus -mcpu=cortex-a15 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -ftree-vectorize -O3 cr_parse-reduced-fsf.

[Bug target/49423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #14 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-09-25 16:18:05 UTC --- (gdb) call debug_rtx(insn) (insn:TI 454 460 607 (set (reg:SI 2 r2 [orig:433 buf+2 ] [433]) (zero_extend:SI (mem/u/c/i:QI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2]) [

[Bug fortran/49430] [F03] ICE with allocatable length character in interface block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430 --- Comment #10 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-09-25 16:16:55 UTC --- oh, sorry please ignore my comment

[Bug fortran/49430] [F03] ICE with allocatable length character in interface block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430 Dinar Temirbulatov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot

[Bug target/49423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #13 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-09-25 16:14:44 UTC --- This time it is "arm_zero_extendqisi2_v6" pattern

[Bug target/49423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 --- Comment #12 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-09-25 16:12:13 UTC --- Created attachment 28273 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28273 testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7 Here is another testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54254 Bug #: 54254 Summary: libiberty: demangling is broken since r167781 (http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=1677 81) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug target/18141] mips64-none-elf-gcc: Excessive NOPs with -march=r3000

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18141 --- Comment #2 from Dinar Temirbulatov 2012-02-21 11:58:23 UTC --- proposed fix for this issue posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg01693.html and the GNU copyright assignment form available upon request.

[Bug middle-end/22141] [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Missing optimization when storing structures

--- Comment #8 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2008-01-17 18:34 --- This regression happens after the SSA was merged in to the mainline -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141

[Bug middle-end/31490] Compile error section type conflict

--- Comment #13 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-08-28 16:25 --- reviewed patch posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg01280.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31490

[Bug target/31552] -fcall-used-vXX turns into ICE

--- Comment #4 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 01:16 --- this issue could not be reproduced on the mainline after dataflow-branch merge -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31552

[Bug middle-end/31490] Compile error section type conflict

--- Comment #9 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-05-16 22:47 --- This patch fixes both testcases --- gcc/varasm.c.orig 2007-05-16 21:32:11.0 +0400 +++ gcc/varasm.c2007-05-16 21:36:14.0 +0400 @@ -5762,12 +5762,14 @@ categorize_decl_for_section (tree decl

[Bug target/31490] Compile error section type conflict

--- Comment #6 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-05-02 16:25 --- workaround for the bug: --- gcc/varasm.c-orig 2007-05-02 19:15:04.0 +0400 +++ gcc/varasm.c2007-05-02 19:16:17.0 +0400 @@ -5519,6 +5519,8 @@ decl_readonly_section (tree decl, int re

[Bug target/31490] Compile error section type conflict

--- Comment #5 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-05-02 16:14 --- I can reproduce this bug any architecture with -fpic option -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31490

[Bug target/31490] Compile error section type conflict

--- Comment #4 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2007-04-06 03:18 --- looks like regression is caused by PR26090 fix -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31490

[Bug inline-asm/23399] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:387

--- Comment #4 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-09-01 19:57 --- I have got the same ICE on mainline gcc-20060815 bug.cc:4: internal compiler error: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:487 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23399

[Bug rtl-optimization/28657] New: could not expand __builtin_constant_p correctly

.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28657

[Bug target/27075] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Compiler generate incorrect assembler for __sync_fetch-* builtins on e500 aka SPE

--- Comment #15 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-26 12:53 --- >As Andrew posted, the question is the impact on other targets... Looking at the patch, it is only about e500(TARGET_E500 defined only for e500), so it should not impact other targets -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug c++/25357] [4.0 Regression] ICE in typeid

--- Comment #9 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-11 19:59 --- fix posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00144.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25357

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

--- Comment #5 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 18:26 --- > It should instead issue the warning "statement is a reference, not call, to > function A::f" gcc producing the warnig, if you using -Wall flag -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

--- Comment #4 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-07-05 10:46 --- >fix > >we need to check first operand for FIELD_DECL before gimpilfying COMPONENT_REF this is a wrong fix, it caused some regressions -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26696

[Bug c++/26696] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE with statement forming unused static member function reference

--- Comment #3 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-06-30 01:08 --- Created an attachment (id=11782) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11782&action=view) fix we need to check first operand for FIELD_DECL before gimpilfying COMPONENT_REF -- http://gcc.

[Bug tree-optimization/26865] [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault with -std=c99 -O1 and alloca()

--- Comment #7 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-04-19 23:25 --- this bug could be fixed my backporting this patch: 2005-12-11 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * timevar.def (TV_IPA_PTA): New. * tree-pass.h (pass_ipa_pta): New * tree-ssa-structa

[Bug target/26098] [4.0 Regression] ICE in multiplication of 16-byte longlong vector on x86_64

--- Comment #3 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-03-10 19:09 --- Created an attachment (id=11018) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11018&action=view) bug fix this a backport form the mainline 2005-05-17 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL

[Bug target/21169] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands with -fnon-call-exceptions -fPIC -O2

--- Comment #9 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-03-10 02:31 --- s/retested on x86_86/retested on another x86_86 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21169

[Bug target/21169] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands with -fnon-call-exceptions -fPIC -O2

--- Comment #8 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-03-10 02:25 --- >I have noticed a few regressions with that patch on x86_86. those regressions were due to a linux kernel problem, retested on x86_86 target and no regressions observed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug target/21169] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands with -fnon-call-exceptions -fPIC -O2

--- Comment #7 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-02-14 11:46 --- (From update of attachment 10787) I have noticed a few regressions with that patch on x86_86. -- dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21169] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands with -fnon-call-exceptions -fPIC -O2

--- Comment #6 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-02-06 16:51 --- Created an attachment (id=10787) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10787&action=view) proposed patch >Can anybody do a regression hunt on mainline? I found original fix on the mainl

[Bug target/21169] [4.0 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands with -fnon-call-exceptions -fPIC -O2

--- Comment #5 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-02-01 11:01 --- no such regression on mainline $ ./gcc-exec/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-20051026/configure --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug target/20036] [3.4 only] gcc.dg/compat/vector-[12]_y.c fails to compile

--- Comment #5 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-01-28 00:52 --- Created an attachment (id=10745) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10745&action=view) fix this patch allows testcases to get passed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20036

[Bug rtl-optimization/25848] New: missed-rtl-optimization

ot gnu dot org ReportedBy: dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25848

[Bug rtl-optimization/25381] local alloc is not really that good

--- Comment #2 from dtemirbulatov at gmail dot com 2006-01-13 00:42 --- Created an attachment (id=10634) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10634&action=view) workaround for the bug verified and tested on ppc_440 # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: powe