https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79328
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eb at emlix dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106503
--- Comment #4 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
You are right, but if you switch the if clause a little bit:
if (argc) {
const char junk[] = "abc";
WRITEL(junk + i);
WRITEL("something else");
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106503
--- Comment #1 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
If you turn the "const char []" into a "const char *" in line 21 it works fine.
iority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eb at emlix dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Given the following test program:
#include
#include
#define WRITEL(str) \
do { \
wdata[wpos].iov_base = (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88707
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eb at emlix dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91197
--- Comment #3 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
It returns the alignment rather than printing. 4 is the correct return code.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eb at emlix dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The story is in https://bugs.gentoo.org/676062 and especially
https://rt.perl.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=133495
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90751
--- Comment #8 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #7)
> On 2019-06-06 5:56 a.m., eb at emlix dot com wrote:
> > The first hunk in config/pa/pa-linux.h only adds whitespace damage.
> No, it adds a period to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90751
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eb at emlix dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #29 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
I guess this would also need a backport into gcc-7-branch as the "asm inline"
changes were backported also there, no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #22 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
I can confirm that with gcc 8.3 with the gcc8-patch Qt 5.12.1 builds fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #18 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
I would have expected something that is more like the error message in this
case:
class foo {
static void bar() const;
};
error: static member function ‘static void foo::bar()’ cannot have cv-qualifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89585
--- Comment #14 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
See https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74196
That's how I found this at all: the latest current releases don't build
together. And I guess that most projects that somehow are descendants of KJS
will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89589
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugreports.qt.io/br
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: eb at emlix dot com
Target Milestone: ---
tee >> JITStubs.cpp << EOF
#define SYMBOL_STRING(name) #name
asm volatile (
".text\n"
".glo
15 matches
Mail list logo
