--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 06:37
---
> Yes our build works on solaris 8.
If the exact same operation works on Solaris 8 but not on Solaris 10, you may
have run into a limitation of GNU ld on Solaris 10. The workaround is probably
to build a
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 06:29
---
> Could you please help us with this error?
> U std::istream::peek()@@GLIBCXX_3.4
Does this work on Solaris 8? Does this work if you rebuild the libraries?
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org c
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:52
---
Aforementioned patch has been reverted.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36384
--- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:44
---
As per comment #15.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-11 05:41
---
Not a compiler issue.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 14:19
---
> If you want to revert the original convert_modes patch, sure, that's an option
> as well. This patch fixed the bootstrap without the reversion though...
Right, but reverting an incorrect patch
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 13:41
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=18562)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18562&action=view) [edit]
> gcc45-pr41324.patch
>
> Patch I'm going to b
--- Comment #21 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 07:40
---
> Do we have precompiled GCC for solaris 10 which uses GNU ld, as etc. We are
> looking for ld (binutils ) version 2.18. This is because the link error that
> we
> are gettting on solaris 10 has rel
--- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 07:19
---
> When you say GCC from http://www.sunfreeware.com
> do you mean by install gcc-3.4.6-sol10-sparc-local.gz on solaris 10 box with
> necessary dependencies?
Yes, try with this one for example. Wha
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 06:52
---
> As mentioned by you the precompiled version of GCC on solaris 10 that we are
> using is not the official compiler. So how do i fullfill this prerequisite
Try with Sun Studio or with the genuine GCC
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 14:08
---
> I ran the same command on command line and got the same error
> conftest.c:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation Fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if approp
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 09:49
---
> I see no code for conftest.c in the config.log.
Yet it is there. You can attach the file if you want and I'll take a look.
> Is there a way where I can check the prerequites for gcc compil
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 18:36
---
*** Bug 41310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 18:36
---
'Search' is your friend. :-)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41112 ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 13:15
---
> /home/odyssey/f065093/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/libgcc/configure
> --cache-file=./config.cache --enable-multilib --prefix=/home/odyssey
> /f065093/gccinstall --with-as=/3rdparty/fsf/binutils/2.18/bin/as
&g
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 10:04
---
> Here is a minimal Ada testcase:
Thanks. Please attach it to the PR.
> Interestingly if I remove the "-g" the ICE disappears.
Welcome to the new, post-VTA world!
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 08:02
---
> Do you mean I have to remove srcdir=/home/odyssey/f065093/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/
> from configure options?
Yes.
> Also your statement building src directory is not supported. Does this mean I
> hav
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 07:27
---
> I am building gcc 4.3.2 on solaris 10 box. I am getting the following build
> error.
> checking for sparc-sun-solaris2.10-gcc...
> /home/odyssey/f065093/gcc/gcc-4.3.2/host-sparc-sun-solaris2.10/g
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41292
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |debug
Summary|verify_ssa failed: Error|[4.5
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 08:47
---
On i686-linux after the small change explained in comment #2.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 07:58
---
> As suggested by you I then set my PATH precedence to /usr/ccs/bin
> even then I am getting the same error.
Please verify with '-v' which 'as' is really used to assemble the prob
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 07:50
---
> I'm going to need an attachment with the files in gnatchop format as mentioned
> in the bug report box to try to duplicate the problem with a cross compiler.
You can very likely duplicate wi
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-07 07:00
---
> We are migrating from solaris 8 to solaris 10. On Solaris 10 we are getting
> link error as mentioned in this bug #15267. Initially we were using ld 2.16.
> As the fix for the link error below is avail
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 21:18
---
In comment #6.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #56 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 21:17
---
This should be fixed everywhere.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #55 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 21:16
---
Subject: Bug 41241
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Sep 6 21:15:45 2009
New Revision: 151463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151463
Log:
PR bootstrap/41241
* combi
--- Comment #53 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 19:08
---
> FYI, here is the updated patch that I've already bootstrapped on x86_64-linux
> and i686-linux and am regtesting ATM.
This is fine, thanks (missing "records" after "This
--- Comment #51 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-06 18:20
---
> I tried several times to reproduce it without success. It is suspicious
> that
> only gnat generated files are different. May be the bug is in gnat specific
> files.
No, it's again C
--- Comment #49 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 16:11
---
> gcc/ada/exp_util.o differs
--- exp_util-stage2.txt 2009-09-05 18:09:00.0 +0200
+++ exp_util-stage3.txt 2009-09-05 18:08:06.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-exp_util-stage2.o: file format el
--- Comment #48 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 15:03
---
> This patch along with Vladamir's patch fixes the
> problem on FreeBSD. Thanks for the quick response.
The patch fixes the cfgloopmanip.o comparison failure on i586-linux as well.
Unfortunately th
--- Comment #33 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 13:04
---
Created an attachment (id=18492)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18492&action=view)
Preprocessed source of stage3 cfgloopmanip.o
/home/eric/build/gcc/native32/./prev-gcc/cc1 -fprepr
--- Comment #31 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 12:55
---
> Does it work if you revert
>
> 2009-09-03 Richard Guenther
>
> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm): Remove check of
> eh_personality_libfunc.
>
> ?
No,
--- Comment #25 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:54
---
Created an attachment (id=18489)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18489&action=view)
stripped stage3 object file on i586-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
--- Comment #24 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:54
---
Created an attachment (id=18488)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18488&action=view)
stage2 object file on i586-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
--- Comment #23 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 11:51
---
> Seems to work for me now. (three of three bootstraps succeeded)
Reconfirmed at revision 151417:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
Bootst
--- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 20:55
---
The problem is not fixed at revision 151391:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/cfgloopmanip.o differs
gcc/ada
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 20:00
---
> Oh, just curious - if you disable address space randomization, does the build
> succeed? (echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize-va-space)
Disabling it is the first thing I do when I get
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i586-*-linux
GCC host triplet: i586-*-linux
GCC target triplet: i586-*-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 08:14
---
Created an attachment (id=18470)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18470&action=view)
Reduced testcase.
To be compiled at -O -g with an --enable-checking=yes,rtl compiler.
--
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: ix86-*-linux
GCC host triplet: ix86-*-linux
GCC target triplet: ix86-*-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41236
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 00:37
---
I tweaked IVOPTS a few months ago to help in similar cases on PowerPC:
2009-05-29 Eric Botcazou
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (strip_offset_1) : New case.
(force_expr_to_var_cost) : Likewise
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-18 20:32
---
Created an attachment (id=18400)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18400&action=view)
Reduced testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ix86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:09
---
*** Bug 13757 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 10:09
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10127 ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-15 06:27
---
Thanks for the report, but we need a preprocessed testcase, see instructions at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
Component|target |rtl
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-10 07:16
---
> thank you for responses, but, when i've to do the 'rm -rf...' before start the
> make bootstrap, or when i got the bootstrap failure?
Once you hit the bootstrap failure. Btw, 'mak
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 16:40
---
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
> Configured with: /oslo.c/gnatmail/release-6_0/gcc-41/build-oslo/src/configure
> --prefix=/opt/gnu/gnat --enable-languages=c,ada --disable-n
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 11:00
---
> 3.4.3 is the GCC old version
Please post the output of 'gcc -v'.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40696
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 10:46
---
> erm... i think im using the old gcc to compile this new one.
I was asking what version of GCC, i.e. the output of 'gcc -v'.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40696
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-09 07:53
---
What compiler do you use to bootstrap?
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 20:57
---
Reopen if not.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 40666
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jul 7 20:46:41 2009
New Revision: 149347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149347
Log:
PR debug/40666
*
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 20:46
---
Subject: Bug 40666
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jul 7 20:46:06 2009
New Revision: 149346
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149346
Log:
PR debug/40666
*
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4.1 Regression] Ada rts |[4.4.1 regression] Ada tools
|build failure
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 10:45
---
Fixing.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 10:45
---
Did this work with 4.4.0?
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 16:43
---
> By simply re-ording of arguments fos sibcall_1 and sibcall_value_1, so that c
> is last element, produced code is ok and no ICE I've seen.
Disparaging it ("s,!c,d,a") would be eve
--- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 15:31
---
> Well, why? For save or called saved registers the functions epilogue/prologue
> takes care. The reason why gcc tries to choose ebx for call address register
> here, is exactly this reason, as it ca
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 12:49
---
> Index: config/i386/i386.md
> ===
> --- config/i386/i386.md (revision 149152)
> +++ config/i386/i386.md (working copy)
> @@ -1
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 16:46
---
> As far as I could tell from the documentation available to me, values-xpg4
> didn't exist until Solaris 2.6. Based on the file names I was thinking
> sol2-6.h was for 2.6 and above, where sol2
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 13:52
---
> If "-mno-faster-structs" is the default, then surely it shouldn't be
> generating ldd/std in this case (and assuming the 8-byte alignment for
> "union myblock").
No, -mno-fas
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 07:57
---
> Attaching a fix that works here for Solaris 10 and I think would work for
> other Solaris versions.
Thanks.
> It changes the spec to account for the other options mentioned in comment 3,
> to han
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-04 06:43
---
> I think the compiler is assuming "union myblock" has the same
> alignment as "struct b_one", which is more strictly aligned than
> "struct b_two" because of its double me
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 06:08
---
*** Bug 40611 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 06:08
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40347 ***
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 05:46
---
Investigating.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-01 05:45
---
Yep.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-28 06:22
---
> FWIW, BOOT_LDFLAGS. that did not solve it either. I think I'll have a go with
> 'sed' and change /usr/local to somewhere else in the gcc-4.4.0.tar file.
> Hopefully that will avoid
--- Comment #13 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-27 20:18
---
> This appears to still be broken in 32-bit mode.
Yes, I've seen similar problems with 4.4.0 and 4.5.0 on x86. Probably the
stack realignment stuff. I'd suggest opening a new PR.
--
http:
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-14 07:23
---
Nothing to do with Ada, cc1obj is the Objective-C compiler.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #36 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 13:24
---
> This bug is marked as one of the "GCC 4.5 pending patches" PRs. Why? I see no
> pending patch...?
They are at AdaCore for the time being. Will need to submit them...
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-31 07:22
---
I think we have enough passes already and should try to stuff this in cse.c and
fwprop.c. See PR middle-end/33699 for related issues.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 07:42
---
Thanks for reporting and fixing this.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 07:41
---
Subject: Bug 40166
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon May 18 07:41:14 2009
New Revision: 147653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147653
Log:
PR ada/40166
* Mak
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-18 07:41
---
Subject: Bug 40166
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon May 18 07:40:56 2009
New Revision: 147652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147652
Log:
PR ada/40166
* Mak
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 21:48
---
> The issue here is that for
>
> VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR *[D.2335:D.2339]>(*_init$P_ARRAY_1)[D.2354_35]
>
> we use the alias set of *_init$P_ARRAY_1 because the array elements are
> non-aliase
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-15 09:14
---
Confirmed on x86-64.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 15:16
---
> Thanks for the speed-of-light response. I'm just thinking, could it be
> related
> to the "-fPIC" argument (I found that in my CFLAGS)?
Yes, please don't set CFLAGS when buil
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 14:54
---
Richard, the subtype bounds removal patch will expose this on x86-64 as well.
Vectorization is not a priority in Ada for the time being so I'll go ahead, but
do you have an idea about the nature of the pr
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 15:06
---
> I think this affects 32-bit sparc as well, unless the br* instructions are new
> in sparcv9 (they don't seem to be).
Yes, they are new in V9 and operate only on the full 64-bit register.
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-08 10:17
---
brz is not used because *ptr is an int, it would be used with a long.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 21:44
---
Subject: Bug 39938
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Apr 29 21:44:26 2009
New Revision: 146988
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146988
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/39938
* Mak
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 21:32
---
This should work now.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 21:30
---
Subject: Bug 39938
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Apr 28 21:29:58 2009
New Revision: 146915
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146915
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/39938
* re
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 19:44
---
> This makes sense to me as a possible explanation, but my response would be
> to turn variable tracking on even at -O0.
This was experimented, but this generates bloated and inferior debugging infor
mati
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-28 06:46
---
> With revision 146829 plus the same patch patch, the build is (again) broken as
> follows:
Interesting, I've never seen this on SPARC, PA or MIPS.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-27 09:17
---
> Reghunting will be difficult, though, since SPARC bootstrap was broken for
> some
> time due to PR bootstrap/39645.
The revision corresponding to the fix for the PR should bootstrap.
--
ebotcaz
--- Comment #11 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 22:57
---
> Does this work too?
Yes, it does, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
--- Comment #9 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 20:27
---
> Anyway, can you try
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/.=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
> or
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/[=]=,' contrib/dg-extract-results.sh
> or
> sed -i -e 's,/==,/^
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 19:02
---
Another nit on Solaris 9:
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes773
# of unexpected failures0
gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/nfs/nile/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc-sun
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 13:39
---
2009-04-20 Ian Lance Taylor
Fix enum conversions which are invalid in C++:
* auto-inc-dec.c (attempt_change): Change 0 to SET in function call.
* calls.c (store_one_arg): Change 0 to
--- Comment #7 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 13:36
---
This should compile now.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 13:32
---
Subject: Bug 39645
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Apr 25 13:32:43 2009
New Revision: 146772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146772
Log:
PR bootstrap/39645
* conf
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-25 13:13
---
Testing a fix.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-24 16:15
---
> The folded a >= C1 && a <= C2 case is correctly handled by VRP btw (I added
> that long time ago).
e...@atlantis:~/build/gcc/native32> cat t.c
extern void link_failure (void);
s
401 - 500 of 2634 matches
Mail list logo
