https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82703
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Bron ---
Created attachment 42465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42465&action=edit
save-temps for g++ 7.2.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82703
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Bron ---
Created attachment 42464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42464&action=edit
save-temps for g++ 7.2.1
: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: frederic.bron at m4x dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42463
--> https://gcc.gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
--- Comment #1 from Frédéric Bron 2011-07-22
08:58:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 24809
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24809
program that fails
This program should write false but writes true.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49812
Summary: strange return type for built-in operator++(int, int)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49462
Summary: comparison of const bool and pointer does not yield an
error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon