[Bug tree-optimization/113224] Warning "is used uninitialized" raised for an initialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113224 --- Comment #3 from gandalf at winds dot org --- Thank you for the suggestion. I'll try the union.

[Bug tree-optimization/113224] New: Warning "is used uninitialized" raised for an initialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113224 Bug ID: 113224 Summary: Warning "is used uninitialized" raised for an initialized variable Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/112615] gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"} has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112615 gandalf at winds dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug target/112615] gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"} has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112615 gandalf at winds dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #3 from gan

[Bug c/112615] New: gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"} has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112615 Bug ID: 112615 Summary: gcc incorrectly assumes char *x[2]={"str1", "str2"} has 16-byte minimum alignment and generates SSE instructions (e.g. movaps) when accessing this data

[Bug target/109236] [avr] Invalid code of signed 16-bit compare optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109236 gandalf at winds dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UN

[Bug c/109236] New: [avr] Invalid code of signed 16-bit compare optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109236 Bug ID: 109236 Summary: [avr] Invalid code of signed 16-bit compare optimization Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug debug/107012] [debug, dwarf-5] Missing line information for evaluating macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107012 --- Comment #1 from gandalf at winds dot org --- Created attachment 53615 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53615&action=edit objdump output for dwarf-5

[Bug debug/107012] New: [debug, dwarf-5] Missing line information for evaluating macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107012 Bug ID: 107012 Summary: [debug, dwarf-5] Missing line information for evaluating macros Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/100256] New: spurious stringop-overflow warning with memset(..., sizeof(dest)) on variable-length array at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100256 Bug ID: 100256 Summary: spurious stringop-overflow warning with memset(..., sizeof(dest)) on variable-length array at -O3 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRME