https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
--- Comment #5 from Jason ---
(In reply to Jason from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > Can you attach a "representativ" (maybe the worst?) compilation unit in
> > preprocessed form?
>
> Compressed, the preprocessed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
--- Comment #4 from Jason ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Can you attach a "representativ" (maybe the worst?) compilation unit in
> preprocessed form?
Compressed, the preprocessed translation unit in question is just too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
--- Comment #2 from Jason ---
Overview:
=
This performance difference appears to affect many versions of g++: my testing
indicates since g++ v7.3.0. The performance difference appears to be a 4-7x
difference in the time taken to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95305
--- Comment #1 from Jason ---
Created attachment 48591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48591=edit
Bar-graph of time taken to compile same code.
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gcc-bugs at hussar dot me.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 48590
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48590=edit
Time taken to compile same code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573
--- Comment #12 from Jason ---
This significant change appears to have been resolved in g++ v8.1.0. So now g++
does the same as the massive corpus of computer science and other compilers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
Jason changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
--- Comment #6 from Jason ---
And lo! Finally! This appears to have been done in g++ v9.3.0. Amazing! Huzzah!
