[Bug c++/40658] spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

--- Comment #3 from gcc at axel-naumann dot de 2009-07-06 10:59 --- OK, I didn't know that the branch is closed, nor that it involves extensive changes. Sorry it took me so long to find this! I can of course use #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds" if neede

[Bug c++/40658] New: spurious warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcc at axel-naumann dot de GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: -m32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40658

[Bug c++/36045] [4.3 regression] returning result of sqrt() can cause wrong return value, invalid reads

--- Comment #1 from gcc at axel-naumann dot de 2008-04-25 13:41 --- Created an attachment (id=15530) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15530&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36045

[Bug c++/36045] New: [4.3 regression] returning result of sqrt() can cause wrong return value, invalid reads

wrong return value, invalid reads Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcc at a

[Bug c/32324] unsigned long long operator << and integer literals

--- Comment #1 from gcc at axel-naumann dot de 2007-06-13 16:50 --- Created an attachment (id=13699) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13699&action=view) Test case as stated in the report. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324

[Bug c/32324] New: unsigned long long operator << and integer literals

gned long long operator << and integer literals Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: gcc at axel-naumann dot de GCC buil