[Bug target/90620] Microblaze: ICE similar to bug 16267

2024-04-13 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90620 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Giulio

[Bug target/109809] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376

2024-02-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109809 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- It's not a problem, but it looks very similar to me: CommandScreen.c:54:1: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376 54 | } | ^ 0x16c6616

[Bug target/109809] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376

2024-02-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109809 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- (In reply to Giulio Benetti from comment #1) > This bug shows up also on gcc 13.2.0 while building htop with optimization > -O2. > This is worked-around by disabling optimization with -O0. For RISCV64

[Bug target/109809] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376

2024-02-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109809 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far

2023-08-22 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744 --- Comment #19 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug still shows up with gcc 12.3.0. Can you please reopen it? Thank you

[Bug target/80786] m68k: internal compiler error: in change_address_1

2023-08-06 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80786 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2022-07-29 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #9 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug shows up with gcc 11.3.0 and 12.1.0

[Bug target/68485] ICE while building gpsd package on microblaze

2022-07-29 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485 --- Comment #11 from Giulio Benetti --- And it shows up on gcc 12.1.0 too.

[Bug target/68485] ICE while building gpsd package on microblaze

2022-07-29 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68485 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug target/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #10 from Giulio Benetti --- Ah, forgot to mention that it builds fine with -O0.

[Bug target/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #8 from Giulio Benetti --- Note that bug is still present in gcc 11.2.0 so it's probable it's still in master branch. Thank you for taking care. Best regards

[Bug target/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #7 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 52200 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52200=edit Pre-processed sg_vpd.c(sg_vpd.s)

[Bug target/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #6 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 52199 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52199=edit Pre-processed sg_vpd.c(sg_vpd.i)

[Bug target/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- This is the output log with -v. Now it's built not in parallel and the file where gcc fails is not sg_dd.c so I'm going to update .i and .s files. ``` Target: m68k-buildroot-uclinux-uclibc Configured

[Bug c/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 52189 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52189=edit Pre-processed sg_dd.c(sg_dd.s)

[Bug c/104028] M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104028 --- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 52188 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52188=edit Pre-processed sg_dd.c(sg_dd.i)

[Bug c/104028] New: M68k: Error: value -16034 out of range

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package sg3_utils on buildroot we get this error: ``` /home/peko/autobuild/instance-0/output-1/host/bin/m68k-linux-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2022-01-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug target/99783] relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 on OpenRISC, building libgeos

2021-12-31 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783 --- Comment #8 from Giulio Benetti --- Thanks a lot Stafford

[Bug target/99783] relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 on OpenRISC, building libgeos

2021-12-30 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Dear Stafford, here we go again, after updating libgeos to version 3.10.1 the same bug shows up. This happens with libgeos but not with protobuf that is fixed. I'm sure i pass -mcmodel=large. Can you help

[Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far

2021-10-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744 --- Comment #18 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51575 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51575=edit Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.s)

[Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far

2021-10-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744 --- Comment #17 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51574 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51574=edit Pre-processed dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.cpp(dvb_bbheader_bb_impl.cc.ii)

[Bug target/43744] SH: Error: pcrel too far

2021-10-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug target/102472] Infinite loop on m68k

2021-09-24 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102472 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID

[Bug target/102472] Infinite loop on m68k

2021-09-23 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102472 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51506 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51506=edit Pre-processed loop.c(loop.s)

[Bug target/102472] Infinite loop on m68k

2021-09-23 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102472 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51505=edit Pre-processed loop.c(loop.i)

[Bug target/102472] Infinite loop on m68k

2021-09-23 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102472 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Oh, I didn't know it could produce .i and .s even when hanging. But yes, that happens before really building. So .i .s files follow. Thank you and Best regards

[Bug c/102472] New: Infinite loop on m68k

2021-09-23 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building python-uvloop package on Buildroot for m68k gcc enters an infinite loop on: ''' /home/giuliobenetti/autobuild/run/instance-3/output-1/host/bin/m68k-linux-gcc -Wno

[Bug target/102244] Arc: Error: operand out of range (0x0000000000001036 is not between 0xfffffffffffff000 and 0x0000000000000fff)

2021-09-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102244 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/102244] Arc: Error: operand out of range (0x0000000000001036 is not between 0xfffffffffffff000 and 0x0000000000000fff)

2021-09-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102244 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51427 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51427=edit Pre-processed hb-ot-shape-complex-use.cpp(hb-ot-shape-complex-use.s)

[Bug c++/102244] Arc: Error: operand out of range (0x0000000000001036 is not between 0xfffffffffffff000 and 0x0000000000000fff)

2021-09-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102244 --- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51426 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51426=edit Pre-processed hb-ot-shape-complex-use.cpp(hb-ot-shape-complex-use.ii)

[Bug c++/102244] New: Arc: Error: operand out of range (0x0000000000001036 is not between 0xfffffffffffff000 and 0x0000000000000fff)

2021-09-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package harfbuzz on buildroot we get

[Bug target/83143] [SH]: Assembler messages: invalid operands (*UND* and .text sections) for `-'

2021-08-27 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 --- Comment #16 from Giulio Benetti --- Thank you. Yes I've just tested "-freorder-blocks-algorithm=simple" solution of gcc 9.x and 11.x with -Os enabled and it works perfectly. By the way, is it useful for you if I provide .i and .s file with

[Bug target/83143] [SH]: Assembler messages: invalid operands (*UND* and .text sections) for `-'

2021-08-27 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83143 --- Comment #14 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug still shows up in gcc version 9.x and 11.x. But not on version 10.x I've found the simple work-around to disable the optimization(override CFLAGS with -O0) and it works.

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #11 from Giulio Benetti --- I think I've found, a -fPIC was in CPPFLAGS while -static too. They can't work together. Indeed removing -fPIC it builds fine. So this is the solution. Please correct if I'm wrong because I'm not that

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #10 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51344 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51344=edit Pre-processed seclang-parser.cc(seclang-parser.s)

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #9 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51343 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51343=edit Pre-processed seclang-parser.cc(seclang-parser.ii)

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #8 from Giulio Benetti --- Hello Andrew, what you point: https://buildroot.uclibc.narkive.com/EOUb7PvD/patch-v2-m68k-disable-br2-binfmt-flat-sep-data-for-coldfire doesn't give problem since 6 years for all package Buildroot has,

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/93847] Nios II ICE

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51342 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51342=edit Pre-processed ref-filter.c(ref-filter.s) This is the assembly of ref-filter.c Hope this helps

[Bug target/93847] Nios II ICE

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51341 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51341=edit Pre-processed ref-filter.c(ref-filter.i) This is the -save-temps of ref-filter.c

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-08-21 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #8 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug still shows up on gcc 9.3.0

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #7 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51339 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51339=edit Pre-processed belle_sip_messageParser.c(belle_sip_messageParser.s)

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #6 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51338 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51338=edit Pre-processed belle_sip_messageParser.c(belle_sip_messageParser.i)

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Disabling parallel build it turns out that the file where it hangs is: src/grammars/belle_sip_messageParser.c So I'm going to add .i and .s attachments for it.

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- It's not git package but belle-sip package that fails to build. I'm going to add .i and .s file soon.

[Bug target/101916] SH4 ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101916 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51337 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51337=edit Pre-processed mime.c(mime.s) Here is the assembler file too.

[Bug target/101915] Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51336 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51336=edit Pre-processed par_ops.c(par_ops.s) Here is the assembler file too.

[Bug target/101952] SH4 ICE: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101952 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51335 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51335=edit Pre-processed btDantzigLCP.cpp(btDantzigLCP.s) Here is the assembler file too.

[Bug target/101952] SH4 ICE: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101952 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51334 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51334=edit Pre-processed btDantzigLCP.cpp(btDantzigLCP.ii) As suggested by Thomas here is pre-processed

[Bug target/101915] Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51333 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51333=edit Pre-processed par_ops.c(par_ops.i) As suggested by Thomas here is pre-processed par_ops.c(par_ops.i) to help you

[Bug target/101916] SH4 ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101916 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 51332 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51332=edit Pre-processed mime.c(mime.i) Here is preprocessed mime.c file(mime.i) to help you fix the bug. Hope this is enough,

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thomas.petazzoni@free-elect

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-18 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- Package is libmodsecurity, not bullet.

[Bug target/101971] M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-18 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101971 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Thank you for pointing, I give it a try, it seems to that one. Also the classic work-around disabling optimization doesn't work and I was trying other workaround. But I try that patch now. Thanks again!

[Bug c++/101971] New: M68k: ICE: Tried to convert PC relative branch to absolute jump

2021-08-18 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package bullet on buildroot we get this error: ''' libtool: compile: /home/giuliobenetti/br_reproduce

[Bug c/101952] New: SH4 ICE: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

2021-08-17 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package bullet on buildroot we get this error: ''' [ 40%] Building CXX object src/BulletDynamics

[Bug target/91591] Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60

2021-08-16 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Hello, I find this bug has been fixed with gcc 8.4.0 and next major versions. I don’t know on which commit it’s been fixed but it builds fine now. Best regards

[Bug target/101915] Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

2021-08-16 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101915 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Ah yes, I’ve forgotten. I’ve tested up to gcc version 11.1.0, but I suspect it happens on master branch too.

[Bug target/91591] Arc: ICE in trunc_int_for_mode, at explow.c:60

2021-08-15 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91591 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- This bug is pretty old and need to retest if it still shows up. Maybe it’s been fixed with gcc minor versions. I will let you know.

[Bug c/101916] New: SH4 ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1

2021-08-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package heirloom-mailx on buildroot we get this error: ''' /home/giuliobenetti/br_reproduce

[Bug c/101915] New: Microblaze ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770

2021-08-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building package lmbench on buildroot we get this error: ''' /home/giuliobenetti/git/upstream/output-microblaze-lmbench-gcc11/host/bin/microblazeel

[Bug target/99783] relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 on OpenRISC, building libgeos

2021-08-14 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99783 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug c/97208] [gcc 10.2.0] Microblaze regression

2021-08-13 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97208 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added CC||giulio.benetti@benettiengin

[Bug c/101766] Microblaze gcc misses symver but __has_attribute(symver) returns true

2021-08-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- I've done this: https://github.com/libfuse/libfuse/pull/620/commits/3aba09a5c56e017746c5c1652dbc845f4db7374a and works fine. It doesn't seem to have pitfalls.

[Bug c/101766] Microblaze gcc misses symver but __has_attribute(symver) returns true

2021-08-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101766 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Ah ok, so the workaround is to check with a little build test, right?

[Bug c/101766] New: Microblaze gcc misses symver but __has_attribute(symver) returns true

2021-08-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- Microblaze gcc can't use .symver attribute leading to: error: symver is only supported on ELF platforms

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-03-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Ah no, wait, that happens with older binutils too, so it doesn't look like the same and most of all it stop to show with gcc 8.x, so it seems that gcc create a particular Assembly that GAS doesn't like or

[Bug target/99410] Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-03-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99410 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- You’re right, it’s an assembler bug, not gcc. And yes it’s the same. Thank you.

[Bug target/93847] Nios II ICE

2021-03-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847 --- Comment #3 from Giulio Benetti --- Hello, can you point me a way to provide the test cases you need? Also, now the bug shows using Buildroot but while compiling a toolchain from scratch, instructions follow: To reproduce it: # git clone

[Bug c/99410] New: Nios II Error: branch offset out of range

2021-03-05 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com via Gcc-bugs
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building git package on Buildroot gcc throws: ''' [ 98%] Building C object src/CMakeFiles/bellesip.dir/antlr3c/src/antlr3treeparser.c.o /tmp/ccDtjRfo.s

[Bug c/93847] Nios II ICE

2020-02-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847 --- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti --- Here is another test-case: http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e22/e225e62ea2d48660df4110790664f0c3306c1ea9/ Here gcc is built from scratch instead of using Codesourcery one, so it should be easy for

[Bug c/93847] New: Nios II ICE

2020-02-20 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- When building git package on Buildroot gcc throws: ''' ref-filter.c: In function 'find_longest_prefixes_1': ref-filter.c:1914:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #17 from Giulio Benetti --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16) > (In reply to Giulio Benetti from comment #15) > > I mark this bug as resolved by: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47794 > > The patch has

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 Giulio Benetti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-08 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #14 from Giulio Benetti --- Hi Ji, thanks for providing this patch, it fixes the problem.

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #8 from Giulio Benetti --- Do you mind to use official Buildroot script to reproduce? Here is the procedure: # git clone git://git.busybox.net/buildroot # wget https://git.busybox.net/buildroot-test/tree/utils/br-reproduce-build -

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #6 from Giulio Benetti --- And this is how riscv32 gcc has been configured: Using built-in specs.

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #5 from Giulio Benetti --- Here is the specific command line which compiles .cpp file: /home/giuliobenetti/br_reproduce/9a405ec6fabfa306c14a671a5e09359ac623c25b/output/host/bin/riscv32-linux-g++

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-02-03 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #4 from Giulio Benetti --- Created attachment 47769 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47769=edit .ii of file where gcc hangs on building This is the .ii of file where gcc hangs on building.

[Bug target/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-01-31 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #2 from Giulio Benetti --- Sorry for the noise. This is true when compiling c files too. :-)

[Bug c++/93532] RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-01-31 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93532 --- Comment #1 from Giulio Benetti --- And the same behaviour is observed building lmbench too. Here is the log: http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d47/d47e46889d7bcc5864c738cb948afc168327b612/build-end.log

[Bug c++/93532] New: RISCV g++ hangs with optimization >= -O2

2020-01-31 Thread giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com
: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: giulio.benetti at benettiengineering dot com Target Milestone: --- Buildroot hangs on building package "bullet" when compiling with g++ and optimization >= -O2, it's noted instead that the problem doesn't show a