https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Hi, installing linux-libc-dev:i386 resolved this issue for me (linux-libc-dev
was already installed).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |diagnostic
Summary|[6/7/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
--- Comment #17 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Obervation that -fno-wrapv also leads to correct code, hence there is somewhere
a wrong assumption that signed overflow occurs (which doesn't).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82931
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82931
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #42575|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-10-07 00:00:00 |2018-1-15
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 15 10:04:32 2018
New Revision: 256687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256687=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/83801
PR c/83729
* gcc.target/avr/torture/pr83729.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 15 10:04:32 2018
New Revision: 256687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256687=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c/83801
PR c/83729
* gcc.target/avr/torture/pr83729.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 83729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 43115 [details]
> gcc8-pr83801.patch
>
> Untested patch, that if !is_init kind of restores the 7.x behavior of not
> using DECL_INITIAL if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> I think the testcases just make invalid assumptions.
Huh? Which assumptions specifically?
1) There are objects of static storage duration in some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 83805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> I don't see any bug actually. You are just saying that the str1 variable is
> __flash, during optimization (already in C FE) it optimizes str1[i] into
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Well, you have 3 objects, str1, str2 and the string literal, if the compiler
> thinks all 3 are needed, it emits all of them. Without
> -fmerge-all-constants
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> If so, avr should override the select_section and unique_section target
> hooks and return something different for the __flash strings.
Also tried
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Well, 7.2 certainly doesn't have any special casing for address spaces in
> categorize_decl_for_section etc., so before claiming it is a regression
> you'd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.2.1
Summary|Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> If so, avr should override the select_section and unique_section target
> hooks and return something different for the __flash strings.
I am just working on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 43107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43107=edit
proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.2.1
Summary|[avr]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83805
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||addr-space, wrong-code
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Compile the following code with
$ avr-gcc -Os bug.c -S -mmcu=avr5
char fun1 (unsigned i)
{
static const __flash char str1[] = "01234
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to gandalf from comment #3)
> Another regression test case (compile with -O):
>
> void code_to_ascii(char buf[1], unsigned int code)
> {
> __attribute__((used))
> static const char __flash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83801
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
char to_ascii (unsigned i)
{
static const char __flash code_tab[] = "0123456789";
return code_tab[i];
}
In the above test case, code_tab is put in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jan 9 11:27:34 2018
New Revision: 256376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256376=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79883
* gcc.target/avr/torture/pr57631.c (dg-warning):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #2)
> Author: gjl
> Date: Tue Jan 9 10:38:45 2018
> New Revision: 256373
Typo in the ChangeLog :-( This was intended for PR83738
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83738
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83737
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jan 9 10:38:45 2018
New Revision: 256373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256373=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Don't save registers in main().
PR target/83737
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
...and this is a middle-end flaw because POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED states:
[...] You need not define this macro [which is the case for avr] if the
ptr_mode, Pmode and word_mode are all the same width
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83738
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83729
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83484
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-8
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/srv/local/gnu/install/gcc-8-host/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83484
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 42917
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42917=edit
tmp.cpp: C++11 test case
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following test case triggers a link failure because the constexpr are not
evaluated at compile time:
$ g++-8 tmp.cpp -Os -save-temps
tmp.o: In function `Port<7>::set(Port<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Oct 2 11:31:03 2017
New Revision: 253343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253343=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/41076
* confg/avr/avr.md (*iorhi3.ashift8-ext.zerox):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
> Author: aldyh
> Date: Wed Sep 13 16:56:35 2017
> New Revision: 252421
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252421=gcc=rev
> Log:
> gcc/
> PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Matthijs Kooijman from comment #12)
> Apologies if this is an obvious question, but I'm not familiar with gcc/g++
> internals. Georg-Johann, you say this requires address space support in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 10:32:36 2017
New Revision: 251272
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251272=gcc=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
Backport from 2017-07-26 gcc-7-branch r250562.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 10:07:51 2017
New Revision: 251271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251271=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 10:01:38 2017
New Revision: 251270
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251270=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-05 trunk r249995.
PR target/81305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:48:48 2017
New Revision: 251269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251269=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:48:48 2017
New Revision: 251269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251269=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80462
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:29:30 2017
New Revision: 251267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251267=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-04-19 trunk r246997.
PR target/80462
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 09:29:30 2017
New Revision: 251267
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251267=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-04-19 trunk r246997.
PR target/80462
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81910
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 08:40:15 2017
New Revision: 251261
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251261=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-08-22 trunk r251256.
PR target/81910
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81910
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 07:57:40 2017
New Revision: 251258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251258=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from 2017-08-22 trunk r251256.
PR target/81910
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81910
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 07:55:34 2017
New Revision: 251257
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251257=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-08-22 trunk r251256.
PR target/81910
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81910
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Aug 22 07:52:42 2017
New Revision: 251256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251256=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81910
* config/avr/avr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 21 12:44:23 2017
New Revision: 251225
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251225=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79883
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_set_current_function):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 21 12:42:47 2017
New Revision: 251224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251224=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79883
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_set_current_function):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #12 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 21 12:39:59 2017
New Revision: 251223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251223=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/79883
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_set_current_function):
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
struct { char a; } __attribute((address(1)));
ICEs the compiler:
cc1: warning: 'address' attribute only applies to variables
x.c:1:8: internal compiler error: Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81910
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81533
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81754
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> Redoing https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2017-08/msg01469.html
I guess due to some server crash / glitch?
> New Revision: 251085
>
> URL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81754
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 14 09:14:16 2017
New Revision: 251085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251085=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81754
PR target/81268
* config/avr/avr.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81754
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 14 09:14:16 2017
New Revision: 251085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251085=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81754
PR target/81268
* config/avr/avr.opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41868=edit
Assembly as generated by 3.4.6 for reference.
mal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41867=edit
snake-i.c: C test case.
The attached tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41861=edit
time-i.c: C test case
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Fixed?
No. The attached test case
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > Probably dup of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045
>
> Agreed, closing as a duplicate of it
>
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
C test case:
void func1 (unsigned char x, char *str)
{
do {
*str++ = '0' + (x & 1);
x = x / 2;
} while (x);
*str = 0;
}
$ avr-gcc-8 foo.c -S -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
With -fdirectives-only locations go bananas:
#include
int f1 (int x)
{
switch (x)
{
case 1: x++; // FALLTHRU
case 2: x--; /* FALLTHRU */
case 3: x++; // line #9
case 4: return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> If you are preprocessing without -C and without -fdirectives-only, then
> comments are gone, so you really can't use them to inhibit the warning.
Yes, so
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
int f1 (int x)
{
switch (x)
{
case 1: x++; // FALLTHRU
case 2: x--; /* FALLTHRU */
case 3: x++;
// FALLTHRU
case 4: return x;
default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:22:31 2017
New Revision: 250576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250576=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-05 trunk r249995.
PR target/81305
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.1, 7.1.1
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:08:56 2017
New Revision: 250574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250574=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-12 trunk r250151.
PR target/81407
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:59:54 2017
New Revision: 250573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250573=gcc=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
Backport from 2017-07-26 gcc-7-branch r250562.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 08:58:37 2017
New Revision: 250562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250562=gcc=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
Backport from 2017-07-21 trunk r250428.
PR lto/81487
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 14:32:30 2017
New Revision: 250522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250522=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-12 trunk r250151.
PR target/81407
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81533
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think there's a separate PR with the suggestion to try constexpr
> evaluation of all constructors for optimization.
Addresses are not constexpr because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #15)
> pr49857-v2-all.diff: Proposed patch
Problems so far:
* ivopts may shred address-space which results in wrong code. This is is the
reason for why the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41829=edit
pr49857-v2-all.diff: Proposed patch
PR 49857
* target.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:55:44 2017
New Revision: 250511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250511=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR
401 - 500 of 1904 matches
Mail list logo
