http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
hariharans at picochip dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47946
--- Comment #4 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-03-02 10:11:19 UTC ---
Hello Jakub,
I tested the patch and it fixes the problem. Thanks for looking into this.
Cheers
Hari
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47946
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-03-01 15:31:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 23504
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23504
The assembly code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47946
Summary: Dwarf uses 64-bits to refer to a structure offset
unnecessarily
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
--- Comment #2 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-02-02 16:08:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 23219
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23219
The assembly with instruction addresses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2011-02-02 16:07:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 23218
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23218
The assembly output from -Os compilation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47590
Summary: var tracking produces wrong debug in code where
optimization is turned off using pragma
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
--- Comment #9 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 17:17 ---
Fixed on mainline.
--
hariharans at picochip dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 16:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=21585)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21585&action=view)
Patch to fix the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45299
--- Comment #7 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-28 16:14 ---
picochip is a vliw processor and reorder_var_tracking_notes tries to move debug
instructions from middle of vliw instructions out. There was a bug in that
which resulted in this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-16 16:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=21495)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21495&action=view)
address encoded assembly
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45299
--- Comment #4 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-16 16:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=21494)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21494&action=view)
assembly code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45299
--- Comment #3 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-16 16:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=21493)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21493&action=view)
The source code
--
hariharans at picochip dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #2 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-16 16:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=21492)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21492&action=view)
The source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45299
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-08-16 16:17 ---
Sorry for the incomplete description. The actual description:
I saw this problem initially on 4.5.0 compiler, but the same problem happens on
mainline too. In function arraysum in the attached example, the
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hariharans at picochip dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc
--- Comment #2 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-24 08:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=20992)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20992&action=view)
struct definition header file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44652
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-24 08:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=20991)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20991&action=view)
c file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44652
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hariharans at picochip dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: picochip-unknown-none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44652
--- Comment #3 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-21 13:59 ---
In my first comment, bug 43982 should have been bug 43983
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44610
--- Comment #2 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-21 13:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=20962)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20962&action=view)
The test assembly
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44610
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-21 13:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=20961)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20961&action=view)
The test sourcecode
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44610
le location information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hariharans at picochip dot com
GCC build tri
--- Comment #9 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-06-02 08:41 ---
Thanks Alexandre. I can confirm that this patch works for this testcase.
Cheers
Hari
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44013
--- Comment #6 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-05-06 14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=20588)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20588&action=view)
sched1 output obtained with -fsched-verbose=8
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44013
--- Comment #5 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-05-06 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=20587)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20587&action=view)
debug dump just before sched1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44013
--- Comment #4 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-05-06 14:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20586)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20586&action=view)
debug dump for combine stage
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44013
--- Comment #3 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-05-06 14:02 ---
This test does fail with -fcompare-debug.
The relevant part of this basic block just before sched1 is
(debug_insn 33 32 34 3 vta_bug.i:12 (var_location:SI converter$rawValue
(unspec_volatile:SI
--- Comment #1 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2010-05-06 13:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=20584)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20584&action=view)
The test sourcecode
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44013
ormation.
Thanks
Hari
--
Summary: VTA produces wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy:
--- Comment #3 from hariharans at picochip dot com 2009-01-30 10:04 ---
Index: gcc/common.opt
===
--- gcc/common.opt (revision 143749)
+++ gcc/common.opt (working copy)
@@ -386,7 +386,7 @@
Do not put
31 matches
Mail list logo
