--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 18:41 ---
The testcase failed at run-time. See PR 42602
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 22:36 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
The testcase failed at run-time. See PR 42602
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00187.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42517
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 22:37 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Now I got
At line 14 of file
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/recursion1.f90
Fortran runtime error: Recursive call to nonrecursive procedure
--- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-03 17:37
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-03 18:14 ---
Really fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-03 19:16 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00116.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42598
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-03 21:50 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00119.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-04 04:28 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42602
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 17:06 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00064.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 17:09
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00065.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 17:39 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42581
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 23:48 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I can't reproduce this with the current 4.5 sources.
I still saw it with today's gcc 4.5. You need -O3 -msse2 on
Linux/x86 to see it.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-01 23:48 ---
It is caused by revision 155246:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00390.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 01:14
---
Created an attachment (id=19442)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19442action=view)
A patch
lto-wrapper translates
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-01-02 01:25
---
Created an attachment (id=19443)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19443action=view)
A patch to fix a typo
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 15:12 ---
Revision 155528 caused:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081222 c_lto_20081222_0.o-c_lto_20081222_1.o link
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081222 c_lto_20081222_0.o-c_lto_20081222_1.o link
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20081222 c_lto_20081222_0.o
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 17:56 ---
A different patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01253.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 21:55
---
Created an attachment (id=19433)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19433action=view)
A patch
That is what I have in mind.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41564
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 21:57
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Created an attachment (id=19433)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19433action=view) [edit]
A patch
That is what I have in mind.
My patch adds -fdump-lto-tree-XXX
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 23:19 ---
It is caused by revision 150695:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-08/msg00375.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 15:50
---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01208.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 21:34 ---
It is caused by revision 155418:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00562.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42558
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 23:27
---
(In reply to comment #9)
Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-all for lto does not work as
expected
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 23:38 ---
Here is a small testcase:
[...@gnu-34 rrs]$ cat pr19427.c
void jumpfunc(int copy, void *p)
{
void *l = jumplabel;
if (copy)
__builtin___memcpy_chk (p, l, 128, __builtin_object_size (p, 0));
jumplabel:
return
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 05:55 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36892 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-31 05:55 ---
*** Bug 30063 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 17:23 ---
A simple testcase:
[...@gnu-26 rrs]$ cat pr42538.i
void Saisie()[3]{
}
[...@gnu-26 rrs]$ ./143523/usr/bin/gcc -S pr42538.i
pr42538.i:1: error: declaration of Saisie as array of voids
pr42538.i:1: internal
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 17:32 ---
I am not sure if
---
char* FormatStringEx (char str[], size_t max_length, char templ[],
void* args, unsigned int flags)
{
...
void *args2;
char *arg,c;
...
while (index-- 0 (arg=va_arg
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 17:33 ---
Icc 11.1 generates:
[...@gnu-6 rrs]$ /opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/059/bin/intel64/icc -S pr42543.c
pr42543.c(55): error: cast to type va_list is not allowed
while (index-- 0 (arg=va_arg((va_list)args2
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:41 ---
With -Wall, icc 11.1 complains:
pr42542.cc(10): remark #981: operands are evaluated in unspecified order
return (a b) ? b : a;
^
detected during instantiation of _Tp std
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:44 ---
Add -ftree-vectorize will cause it to fail.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:45 ---
It could be a target issue.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 19:51 ---
There are no unsigned integer vector compare insns on x86.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 20:48 ---
-ftree-vectorize -msse4 works fine since it generates pmaxud in SSE4.1.
It seems that gcc doesn't properly emulate pmaxud.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42542
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 20:52 ---
The bug may be in umaxv4si3 pattern.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 21:40 ---
Here is a testcase in C:
[...@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat y.c
unsigned int foo[] __attribute__ ((aligned(16))) =
{
0x8000, 1, 0xa000, 2,
3, 0xd000, 0xf000, 0xe000
};
unsigned int bar[] __attribute__
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 23:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=19420)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19420action=view)
A patch
I don't see how we can easily check unsigned underflow in vector
integer subtraction. This patch simply
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 04:47 ---
Hi Richard, the code in question is added by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg02185.html
I don't quite understand how it can properly handle unsigned V4SI
underflow in V4SI vector subtraction
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-30 04:49
---
Created an attachment (id=19422)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19422action=view)
An updated patch
I am testing this patch now.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-28 14:59 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01156.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-28 16:46
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-28 22:52 ---
It is caused by the new implementation of Graphite:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg01187.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-29 05:10 ---
I also saw it on Linux/x86-64. It is caused by revision 154561:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00784.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 18:53
---
On Linux/x86-64, revision 155479 gave:
==25359== Invalid read of size 8
==25359==at 0xC714EE: lst_interchange_select_inner
(graphite-interchange.c:708)
==25359==by 0xC714DC: lst_interchange_select_inner
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 18:54 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42178 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 18:54
---
*** Bug 42510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42178
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 19:36 ---
It is caused by revision 143502:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-01/msg00515.html
and revision 144314:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-02/msg00481.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 20:58 ---
Gcc 4.3.4 gave
pr41344.f: In function âxrotateâ:
pr41344.f:10: error: invalid exit from OpenMP structured block
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 21:32 ---
This is caused by revision 147995:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00974.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 21:34 ---
This is caused by revision 147995:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00974.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-27 23:57 ---
It is caused by tuples merge:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-07/msg00919.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41344
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-28 01:09 ---
The omplower pass turns
---
#pragma omp parallel private(ix) private(ndfl)
{
ix = 0;
{
integer(kind=4) D.1393;
D.1393 = dfm.ndfl;
#pragma omp for private(i)
for (i
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-28 02:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19398)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19398action=view)
A patch
Does this patch make any senses?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41344
: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42510
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 16:22 ---
Gcc 4.4.2 runs cleanly under valgrind.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 19:22 ---
This is caused by revision 155418:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00562.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42510
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 21:04 ---
It is caused by revision 154880:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00024.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 21:44 ---
Try adding -mstackrealign.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42513
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 22:13 ---
It may be caused by revision 147716:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00693.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 22:16 ---
It is related to PR 41497.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 22:19 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 40838 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #66 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-26 22:19
---
*** Bug 42513 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 17:15 ---
*** Bug 42504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 17:15 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42439 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-24 16:59 ---
It is fixed by revision 145494:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg00115.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42488
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-25 01:24 ---
It may be fixed by revision 151260:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg6.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression] Many graphite test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 20:12 ---
It is caused by revision 153958:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00176.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 21:01 ---
Since LTO tree dump is quite different, can't we give it a different
command line option, something like -fdump-tree-lto-all, instead of
enabling it with -fdump-tree-all?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 17:31 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42456
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42422
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32280
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42144
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42373
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41235
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42354
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42284
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42257
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42335
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-23 00:53 ---
It is caused by revision 154402:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00623.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42395
--- Comment #21 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-21 16:06
---
Reopened
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-21 16:07
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-21 20:54
---
It is caused by revision 151461:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00207.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-21 22:04 ---
It is caused by revision 151696:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00443.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42456
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 01:52 ---
It is caused by revision 154869:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00013.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 03:36 ---
It may also have caused:
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite
-I/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/../../gcc
-I/export/gnu
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 05:56 ---
I got
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/clear/1.cc:28:
undefined reference to
`std::__atomic0::atomic_flag::clear(std::memory_order)'^M
/export/gnu/import/svn
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-22 06:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
It may also have caused:
UNRESOLVED: attribute_plugin.c compilation, -I.
-I/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite
-I/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-20 20:35 ---
There are 2 separate bugs. Please open a new one for
-march=i386 -march=native -mfpmath=sse.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unusual behavior of - |[4.5 Regression] -
|march=native option
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-20 20:40 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
There are 2 separate bugs. Please open a new one for
-march=i386 -march=native -mfpmath=sse.
I opened PR 42444 for this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42442
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-20 21:58 ---
It is caused by revision 148271:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg00251.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1101 - 1200 of 3333 matches
Mail list logo
