[Bug driver/42442] [4.5 Regression] -march=native doesn't apply to multiple files

2009-12-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unusual behavior of - |[4.5 Regression] - |march=native option

[Bug driver/42444] New: "-march=i386 -march=native -mfpmath=sse" problem

2009-12-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC tar

[Bug driver/42442] Unusual behavior of -march=native option

2009-12-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-20 20:35 --- There are 2 separate bugs. Please open a new one for "-march=i386 -march=native -mfpmath=sse". -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/42435] New: [4.5 regression] gfortran.dg/graphite/pr42285.f90

2009-12-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
t gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42435

[Bug tree-optimization/42398] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in sra_modify_expr, at tree-sra.c:2175

2009-12-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-17 17:27 --- This is caused by new SRA: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00959.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42398

[Bug debug/42396] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2out.c:1859

2009-12-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-17 16:38 --- It is caused by revision 147995: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00974.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/42386] [4.5 Regression] ICE in ipcp_iterate_stage, at ipa-cp.c:766

2009-12-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-16 17:30 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=19322) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19322&action=view) [edit] > gcc45-pr42386.patch > > Fix for this testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/42386] [4.5 Regression] ICE in ipcp_iterate_stage, at ipa-cp.c:766

2009-12-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-16 14:43 --- It is caused by revision 155143: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00287.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/42379] New: [4.5 Regression] Revision 155245 failed 1_neg.cc

2009-12-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42379

[Bug bootstrap/42369] [4.5 Regression] Revision 155217 failed to bootstrap

2009-12-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-14 19:13 --- Created an attachment (id=19293) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19293&action=view) A patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42369

[Bug bootstrap/42369] [4.5 Regression] Revision 155217 failed to bootstrap

2009-12-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-14 19:01 --- It is caused by revision 155217: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-12/msg00361.html The problem is ;; Single word integer modes without QImode and HImode. (define_mode_iterator SWI48 [SI (DI "TARGET_

[Bug bootstrap/42369] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

2009-12-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42369

[Bug c++/42225] [4.5 Regression] GCC 4.5 ICE (segfault) on C++ templated code

2009-12-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-11 17:24 --- Confirmed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug bootstrap/42345] cannot force 32 bit toolchain only

2009-12-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-10 18:01 --- After you applied this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00544.html # CC="gcc -m32" CXX="g++ -m32" .../gcc/configure i686-linux should work if you have all 32bit

[Bug bootstrap/42345] cannot force 32 bit toolchain only

2009-12-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-10 15:09 --- FWIW, I am using: # CC="gcc -m32" CXX="g++ -m32" gcc_cv_as_ix86_gotoff_in_data=yes ../src-t runk/configure i686-linux --enable-tls to bootstrap 32bit gcc 4.5 on Linux/In

[Bug target/42324] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-10 14:41 --- This is what I got from Sun: Solaris x86-64 compiler does not support this x86-64 psABI requirement for _Bool : "When a value of type _Bool is passed in a register or on the stack, the upper 63 bits o

[Bug target/42324] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-09 17:43 --- Created an attachment (id=19268) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19268&action=view) Source and object files These are sources and object files generated by gcc 4.4, icc 11.1 and Sun St

[Bug target/42324] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-08 18:26 --- Both icc and gcc generate: [...@gnu-26 pr42324]$ cat b4.c extern unsigned int bartmp; void foo(_Bool bar) { bartmp = bar; } [...@gnu-26 pr42324]$ objdump -dw b4.o b4.o: file format elf64-x86-64 Disassembly

[Bug target/42324] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-08 18:17 --- Another testcase: [...@gnu-26 pr42324]$ cat b3.c void foo (unsigned long, unsigned int, unsigned long, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned int, unsigned long, unsigned int

[Bug rtl-optimization/42269] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Extra sign extension instructions generated

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-08 06:05 --- On Linux/ia32, I got FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42269-2.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42269-2.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42269-2.c execution, -O2 -flto FAIL: gcc.c

[Bug target/42324] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-07 20:59 --- (In reply to comment #5) > The ABI says "is passed", not "is returned". The frontend did return-value > promotion until I disabled that (see endless discussions and libffi fixes > at th

[Bug target/42324] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-07 19:41 --- We have 3 options: 1. Keep the psABI ASIS and fix gcc. But zero out upper 32bits of 64bits for _Bool on stack doesn't make any sense. 2. Remove that paragraph in the psABI and keep gcc ASIS. It will make

[Bug target/42324] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-07 18:58 --- Gcc 4.1/4.2 generate: xorl%eax, %eax testb %dil, %dil setne %al ret -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/42324] Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-07 18:39 --- (In reply to comment #1) > For what it's worth, gcc 3.4.6 generates a clear on the output register, and > therefore complies with the written ABI. > That is true. However, gcc 3.4.6 does: [...@

[Bug target/42324] New: Gcc doesn't follow x86-64 psABI on _Bool

2009-12-07 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: x86_64-*-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42324

[Bug bootstrap/42306] [4.5 regression] Revision 155012 breaks lto-plugin

2009-12-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-06 00:12 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug bootstrap/42306] [4.5 regression] Revision 155012 breaks lto-plugin

2009-12-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-05 23:51 --- lto-plugin/: * configure: Regenerate. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. is bogus. Those files aren't changed at all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42306

[Bug bootstrap/42306] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 155012 breaks lto-plugin

2009-12-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
IRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42306

[Bug c/42299] another verify_ssa failure with -g -O2

2009-12-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-05 12:58 --- It is caused by revision 154402: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00623.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42110] [4.5 Regression] ICE with inlining

2009-12-04 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-04 13:45 --- It is caused by revision 154200: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00421.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42110

[Bug c++/42225] [4.5 Regression] GCC 4.5 ICE (segfault) on C++ templated code

2009-11-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-12-01 00:27 --- It is caused by revision 145440: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-04/msg00060.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42225

[Bug middle-end/42193] [4.5 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to compile at -O3

2009-11-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-30 22:21 --- Fixed -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/42216] [4.5 Regression] 464.h264ref peak regressed 20%

2009-11-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-30 10:54 --- This may be related to revision 154688, which has caused PR 42202. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42216

[Bug middle-end/41183] [4.4 Regression] ICE compiling chromium

2009-11-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-30 07:56 --- It is caused by revision 139945: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-09/msg00103.html and fixed by revision 147852: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00829.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed

[Bug c++/42219] [4.5 Regression] ICE with "const void" as parameter type

2009-11-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-30 03:39 --- It is caused by revision 150519: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-08/msg00199.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42220] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/complex_intrinsic_5.f90 -O3 -funroll*-loops

2009-11-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-29 23:25 --- It may be related to PR 42202. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42220

[Bug c++/36408] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] ICE with statement expression in template

2009-11-28 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-29 04:08 --- The testcase failed on Linux/ia32: FAIL: g++.dg/template/stmtexpr2.C (test for errors, line 10) FAIL: g++.dg/template/stmtexpr2.C (test for errors, line 17) -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed

[Bug tree-optimization/42205] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed with -ffast-math -floop-interchange

2009-11-28 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-28 08:50 --- It is caused by revision 154561: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00784.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures

2009-11-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-28 00:47 --- It is caused by revision 154688: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00911.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures

2009-11-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202

[Bug middle-end/42193] [4.5 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to compile at -O3

2009-11-27 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-27 08:15 --- It is caused by revision 154667: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00890.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42193] New: [4.5 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to compile at -O3

2009-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
ortedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42193

[Bug c++/42187] ice when inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers

2009-11-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-27 05:52 --- It is caused by revision 154200: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00421.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/41611] [4.5 Regression] guard variable is emitted even when the guarded symbol isn't

2009-11-25 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-25 10:10 --- Gcc 4.5 generates: --- .file "pr41611.cc" .weak _ZGVZN1A4InitEvE1i .section .bss._ZGVZN1A4InitEvE1i,"awG",@nobits,_ZZN1A4InitEvE1i,comdat .a

[Bug middle-end/42160] [4.5 Regression] Revision 154433 failed gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c

2009-11-24 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-24 08:14 --- It is caused by revision 154433: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00654.html I also saw it on Linux/ia32, Linux/ia64 and Linux/x86-64. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What

[Bug tree-optimization/39960] [4.5 Regression] struct-reorg is broken

2009-11-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-21 22:08 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/42109] stack alignment happens _before_ mcount "push %ebp ..." depending on -mtune flags

2009-11-19 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-20 04:00 --- (In reply to comment #6) > The good ones produce: > > 650: 55 push %ebp > 651: 89 e5 mov%esp,%ebp > 653: 83 e4 f0and$0xfff

[Bug middle-end/42095] [4.5 Regression] g++.dg/lto/20081118-1 cp_lto_20081118-1_0.o-cp_lto_20081118-1_1.o link

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 17:31 --- It is caused by revision 154284: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00505.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/42095] [4.5 Regression] g++.dg/lto/20081118-1 cp_lto_20081118-1_0.o-cp_lto_20081118-1_1.o link

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 16:41 --- I got lto1: error: edge points to wrong declaration:^M >^M QI^M size ^M unit size ^M align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7f77d2ab9210 method basetype ^M arg-ty

[Bug middle-end/42095] New: [4.5 Regression] g++.dg/lto/20081118-1 cp_lto_20081118-1_0.o-cp_lto_20081118-1_1.o link

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42095

[Bug testsuite/42086] FAIL: gcc.target/ia64/fptr-1.c execution test

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 16:37 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00936.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/41913] ERROR: tcl error sourcing gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 16:04 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/42086] New: Too small .bss stack

2009-11-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
t org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu BugsThisDependsOn: 41567 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42086

[Bug middle-end/42080] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 154242 caused testsuite error

2009-11-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
caused testsuite error Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http

[Bug lto/42074] New: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-math-7.c failed

2009-11-16 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42074

[Bug middle-end/42044] [4.4 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c

2009-11-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-14 18:37 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Presumably fixed for 4.5 by revision 154178. > Yes, revision 154178 fixed it on trunk. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|R

[Bug middle-end/42044] New: [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c

2009-11-14 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
ession] gcc.c-torture/compile/930117-1.c Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail d

[Bug debug/41988] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/*.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (internal compiler error)

2009-11-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 20:38 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Well I know it appeared between revision 152380 and 153960. I don't have a > narrower revision right now though. > Please read Since at least revision 152615, I see

[Bug debug/41988] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/*.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (internal compiler error)

2009-11-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 20:22 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Is this a regression or a new test? They are OK on Linux. > > > > BTW, stack alignment was checked in a long time ago. > > The t

[Bug debug/41988] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/*.C -gdwarf-2 -g1 (internal compiler error)

2009-11-13 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-13 16:45 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This was more likely caused by HJL's stack alignment patches based on the > context of the ICE. > > I had also saw this the last time I ran the testsuite on x86-darw

[Bug middle-end/42024] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 154128 caused many failures

2009-11-12 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42024

[Bug testsuite/42001] LTO tests fail with non multilib targets (but still not --disable-multilib )

2009-11-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 20:06 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00566.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/41913] ERROR: tcl error sourcing gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp

2009-11-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 15:33 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-11/msg00541.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/42001] LTO tests fail with non multilib targets (but still not --disable-multilib )

2009-11-11 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 15:08 --- (In reply to comment #5) > well most targets are multilibbed now so I never saw it. I think you should > just remove -lm then . > -lm is added to most, if not, tests. How do you remove it? Shouldn'

[Bug testsuite/42001] LTO test failures

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 06:05 --- You have to see it on a machine without multilib support. Otherwise, gcc driver will pass -L... to linker. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42001

[Bug testsuite/42001] LTO test failures

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 06:02 --- GNU linker doesn't search any directories when "-r" is used. Gcc driver doesn't pass explicit search directories to linker: [...@gnu-29 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -v x.o Reading specs from ./spec

[Bug rtl-optimization/41619] [4.4/4.5 regression] ICE in insert_save (caller-save.c) for SPEC CPU2000's 252.eon

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-11 05:34 --- Revision 149212: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg00089.html may be the cause. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41619

[Bug middle-end/42004] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 154079 failed g++.dg/torture/stackalign/unwind-2.C

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42004

[Bug testsuite/42001] New: LTO test failures

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42001

[Bug testsuite/41913] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/lt

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-10 23:55 --- It may be caused by revision 153555: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-10/msg01210.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/41913] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/lt

2009-11-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-10 23:51 --- I also saw it on Linux/ia32. Revision 153552 is OK. Revision 153563 is bad. It is very likely caused by revision 153557: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-10/msg01212.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

[Bug middle-end/41963] New: [4.5 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2K is miscompiled

2009-11-05 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41963

[Bug driver/41931] New: -fuse-linker-plugin leaves temporary file behind

2009-11-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
-linker-plugin leaves temporary file behind Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot

[Bug testsuite/41878] [4.5 Regression] ERROR: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90

2009-11-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-03 15:36 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libffi/41923] New: libffi.call/testclosure.c failed on Linux/x86-64

2009-11-03 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
: P3 Component: libffi AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41923

[Bug middle-end/41907] [4.5 Regression] 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime failure

2009-11-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-02 17:44 --- It is caused by revision 153793: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x006a05d1 in __shell2_module_MOD_make_kei () (gdb) bt #0 0x006a05d1 in __shell2_module_MOD_make_kei () #1

[Bug middle-end/41907] [4.5 Regression] 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime failure

2009-11-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-02 15:49 --- It may be caused by revision 153793: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg9.html or revision 153795: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00011.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed

[Bug middle-end/41907] New: [4.5 Regression] 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 runtime failure

2009-11-02 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2006 runtime failure Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail

[Bug c++/41856] g++.dg/lookup/extern-c-redecl[3,4] .C scan-assembler fails on darwin

2009-10-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-31 17:31 --- *** Bug 41890 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/41890] Invalid g++.dg/lookup/extern-c-redecl[34].Cg++.dg

2009-10-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-31 17:31 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41856 *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

2009-10-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #65 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-31 16:47 --- Here are the differences of "-m32 -O3 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math -funroll-loops" vs. "-m32 -O3 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -ffast-math -funroll-loops -mstackrealign" using ix86/gcc-4_4-branch on

[Bug testsuite/41890] New: Invalid g++.dg/lookup/extern-c-redecl[34].Cg++.dg

2009-10-31 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41890

[Bug testsuite/41878] New: [4.5 Regression] ERROR: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90

2009-10-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
t: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41878

[Bug c++/41877] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 153734 failed libstdc++ tests

2009-10-30 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41877

[Bug tree-optimization/41750] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #23 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-29 22:02 --- Created an attachment (id=18930) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18930&action=view) A testcase [...@gnu-6 pr41750]$ make clean rm -f *.o *.s *.c.* [...@gnu-6 pr41750]$ make CFLAGS=&q

[Bug tree-optimization/41750] [4.5 Regression] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-29 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-29 19:30 --- IPA-SRA miscompiled get_got in elf64-ia64.c: got = ia64_info->root.sgot; if (!got) { flagword flags; dynobj = ia64_info->root.dynobj; if (!dynobj) ia64_info->ro

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-26 19:19 --- This is another IPA-SRA bug. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/41750] gcc 4.5.0 miscompiles binutils

2009-10-26 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #17 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-26 16:59 --- Revision 152433 is OK and revision 152642 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41750

[Bug middle-end/41762] internal compiler error when compiling xorg-server

2009-10-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-23 04:49 --- (In reply to comment #7) > > This patch works for me. > > Does it work for testcase from #1 as well? > > I was bisecting trunk to find where this is fixed, it seems to be somewhere > between r

[Bug middle-end/41762] internal compiler error when compiling xorg-server

2009-10-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-22 22:48 --- Created an attachment (id=18874) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18874&action=view) A patch backported from trunk This patch works for me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug middle-end/41762] internal compiler error when compiling xorg-server

2009-10-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-22 21:55 --- This is fixed on trunk by revision 149082: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-06/msg01067.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/41785] [4.5 Regression] [C++0x] ICE on canonical types with variadic templates and CRTP

2009-10-22 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-22 16:34 --- It is caused by revision 149188: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-07/msg00065.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41785

[Bug debug/41739] [4.5 Regression] Failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64

2009-10-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-21 00:52 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/41773] [4.5 Regression] Many libstdc++ failures

2009-10-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-20 21:21 --- Revision 153021 is OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41773

[Bug libstdc++/41773] New: [4.5 Regression] Many libstdc++ failures

2009-10-20 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41773

[Bug middle-end/41739] New: [4.5 Regression] Failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia64

2009-10-17 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41739

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #62 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 02:48 --- (In reply to comment #61) > > As for the updated patch --- why does it modify the autovectorizer? Anything > that the autovectorizer does can be done manually without the autovectorizer. > So, if the

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #60 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-16 00:56 --- Created an attachment (id=18805) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18805&action=view) An updated patch This patch aligns stack if there is a stack variable with 128bit alignment. --

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #59 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-15 20:54 --- (In reply to comment #58) > (In reply to comment #53) > > Created an attachment (id=18656) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18656&action=view) [edit] > > An upd

[Bug target/41665] Typo in addsi_1_zext?

2009-10-15 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-15 14:05 --- Fixed. -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

<    8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   >