mmary: LTO tests leave many 063t.alias files behind
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41707
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-14 00:14 ---
For Linux/ia32, I got
Executing on host: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/ c_lto_20091013-1_0.o
c_lto_20091013-1_1.o c_lto_20091013-1_2.o -fPIC
--- Comment #24 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-12 13:59
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> > If you think adding -mstackrealign to your build is an acceptable solution,
> > we can close this bug. Otherwise, please test my latest gcc 4.4 patch for
> >
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41677
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-11 19:34 ---
It is caused by revision 147716:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-05/msg00693.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-11 16:59 ---
Revision 147714 is OK and revision 147717 is bad.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-11 14:28 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-10/msg00693.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 18:57 ---
For
case TYPE_LEA:
operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0));
return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}";
Won't we get "(zero_extend:DI ...)" for operands[2]
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 18:29 ---
Never mind. alternative starts at 0.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
"%0,0")
Am I missing something?
--
Summary: Typo in addsi_1_zext?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665
--- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-10 14:46
---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Without a testcase, people may not review the patch.
> >
>
> May be just include your tests from Bug 40838? (even without
--- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 14:43
---
Without a testcase, people may not review the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-07 13:35 ---
It may be caused by revision 152520:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-10/msg00169.htm
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
yC1Ev *INTERNAL* ,_ZN8__JArrayC1Ev *INTERNAL*
Revision 152518 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.5 regression] Bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo:
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-10-02 13:30 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
-
abs-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http
sion: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41542
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 19:13 ---
It no longer hangs as of revision 152331:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-09/msg02788.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41519
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-30 12:59 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-29 18:02 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg02117.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-29 17:36 ---
Hi Janis, I think one of your patches causes this. It removed
"-ansi -pedantic-errors -Wno-long-long" in the second run for
--target_board 'unix{-m32,}'.
--
hjl dot tools at g
: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41496
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-28 15:48 ---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-28 02:22 ---
Hardware went bad.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 20:20 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Jakub,
> Can you check what --save-temps produces for g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C
> in partition1.s on linux? Does it produce two sets of global statements as
> wel
--- Comment #53 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 16:58
---
Created an attachment (id=18656)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18656&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc 4.4
Oops. Wrong patch. Trry this one.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail
--- Comment #49 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 14:06
---
(In reply to comment #48)
> It can be seen from the patch. I don't know how to detect that a structure
> contains an array with required SSE align, so I realign the stack for all
> types
Please f
--- Comment #52 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 16:55
---
Created an attachment (id=18655)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18655&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc 4.4
Please try this patch for gcc 4.4.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail
--- Comment #51 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 16:15
---
(In reply to comment #50)
>
> I am saying that the patch could be included in 4.4 as a quick fix and that
> 4.5
> needs stack alignment redesign. You can't redesign it by incrementally testing
&
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-26 14:14 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Isn't this a linker issue in that it doesn't use the biggest alignment?
>
Linker can't change alignment on non-common symbols. I think it is wrong
to give a differ
--- Comment #47 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-25 02:31
---
(In reply to comment #46)
> Created an attachment (id=18646)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18646&action=view) [edit]
> A patch for gcc 4.4.1
>
> I decided to mak
--- Comment #44 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 16:34
---
(In reply to comment #43)
> With the patch from comment #41, my test examples pass but seamonkey is still
> miscompiled, the function pow5mult still doesn't align the stack and spills
> xmm0 on it.
&
igned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41450
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-23 00:11 ---
It is caused by revision 152018:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00767.html
I also saw on Linux/ia32, but not Linux/x86-64.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-22 03:08 ---
My Linux/ia32 machine may be dying.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41432
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 23:15 ---
Gcc is configured with
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld
Linux/x86-64 seems OK. Use
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=assert
--with-demangler
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #25 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-21 19:53
---
(In reply to comment #24)
> OK, so I have finally got to the root of the assert failure in
> reg-stack.c described in the bug description. The file is indeed
> miscompiled, and the miscompiled fu
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 23:31
---
It is caused by revision 145254:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00761.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #23 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 19:37
---
*** Bug 41417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 19:37 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41395 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #42 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 18:44
---
(In reply to comment #39)
> The updated patch fixes align-counterexample1.c, but not
> align-counterexample2.c. Note that you must align the stack for all functions
> that have some SSE operations, be
--- Comment #41 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 18:44
---
Created an attachment (id=18618)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18618&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc 4.4
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #40 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 18:43
---
Created an attachment (id=18617)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18617&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc trunk
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-20 02:33 ---
You are allocating 8MB on stack. You need to raise your stack limit.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:47
---
All new tests are failing.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:47 ---
On Linux/ia32, Linux/ia64 and Linux/Intel64, I got
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/missing-header-MD.c (test for errors, line 5)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/missing-header-MD.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/missing-header-MMD.c
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:42
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created an attachment (id=18608)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18608&action=view) [edit]
> sse & 32bit -> -mstackrealign (example only!)
>
--- Comment #38 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:40
---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Created an attachment (id=18578)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18578&action=view) [edit]
> A bug example for 4.4 patch
>
> Shows a bug in 4.4 p
--- Comment #37 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:38
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Created an attachment (id=18579)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18579&action=view) [edit]
> Another bug in 4.4 patch
>
> Another bug in 4.4
--- Comment #36 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:38
---
Created an attachment (id=18611)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18611&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc trunk
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #35 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 21:37
---
Created an attachment (id=18610)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18610&action=view)
An updated patch for gcc 4.4
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|
--- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 17:50
---
*** Bug 41410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41395
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 17:50 ---
Why do you open 3 bug reports for the same problem?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41395 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 17:29 ---
It is caused by revision 145283:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-03/msg00790.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 15:59
---
*** Bug 41407 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41395
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 15:59 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41395 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 15:58 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41395 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-19 15:58
---
*** Bug 41409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 16:58 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> update:
>
> the latest gcc-4.4-20090918 seems to work but i don't see
> any fixes on the 4.4 branch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/dwarf2o
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 13:49 ---
This is caused by revision 151696:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00443.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 05:44 ---
It is caused by revision 151800:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00547.html
It is reproducible on both Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 04:39 ---
Gcc is configured with
--enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=assert
--with-demangler-in-ld --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-haifa
--prefix=/usr/gcc-4.5 --with-local-prefix=/usr
t: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41395
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 03:26 ---
*** Bug 41392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-18 03:26 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37074 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #26 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 13:47
---
*** Bug 34653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 13:47 ---
This is a dup for PR 17387.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 17387 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 13:25 ---
The failure looks like
Executing on host: /export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/gcc/
/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-17 03:31 ---
On Linux/x86-64, revision 151771 gave
FAIL: gcc.dg/2111-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/2906-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20010405-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/20011214-1
: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41385
--- Comment #19 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 17:41
---
Index: varasm.c
===
--- varasm.c(revision 151703)
+++ varasm.c(working copy)
@@ -6420,6 +6420,8 @@ default_encode_section_info (tree decl
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 15:42 ---
[...@gnu-34 rrs]$ ./151696/usr/bin/gcc
/export/gnu/import/rrs/151696/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/builtin_unreachable-1.c
-m32 -S -Os
/export/gnu/import/rrs/151696/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-15 15:38 ---
Revision 151696:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00443.html
is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
torture/compile/builtin_unreachable-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 13:47 ---
Revision 151681 is OK.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-14 05:09 ---
On Linux/ia64, I got
../../../../src-trunk/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc: In function '(static
initializers for ../../../../src-trunk/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_alloc.cc)':
../../../../src-trunk/li
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41352
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-11 15:01 ---
Pilot error.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
BugsThisDependsOn: 38992
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-10 14:46
---
I think we should revert revision 151573 and find a better fix
for PR 39779.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-10 13:30 ---
Revision 151573 is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-10 01:10 ---
It was introduced between revision 151561 and revision 151575.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41324
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41324
strap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41322
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-09 20:03 ---
This may be caused by revision 151567:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00314.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #27 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-06 15:37
---
EH has been problematic on Darwin/x86, see PR 37012.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41260
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-06 01:27 ---
It is caused by revision 151394:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-09/msg00140.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 18:32 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg00412.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 18:25 ---
I am testing this patch:
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 151352)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -404,9 +404,10
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 18:18 ---
MULTISUBDIR is updated in the 32bit libstdc++ Makefile after
"MULTISUBDIR =" has been appended to Makefiles in the subdirectories.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 17:16 ---
configure failed to set MULTISUBDIR in the libstdc++ subdirectories.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41280
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-05 17:09 ---
"make install" installs the 32bit c++config.h in the same place as
the 64bit version.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41280
++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-03 14:25
---
I got my first compare failure at revision 151353.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41241
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-03 13:56 ---
It may be caused by VTA merge. I also got random compare failures.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-03 13:54 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41241 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1301 - 1400 of 3390 matches
Mail list logo
