https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578
--- Comment #11 from Jan-Willem Blokland ---
If you make use of an temporary variable, it sounds like you will do an
additional memory copy. Therefore, I am wondering what the performance impact
will be. Naively, I would think the span solution w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578
--- Comment #7 from Jan-Willem Blokland ---
Thanks for verifying my case. Your test makes me wonder which intrinsics are
effected in this and other versions of gfortran. Furthermore, I assume it also
happens when you pass the pointer to subroutin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Willem Blokland ---
Created attachment 48259
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48259&action=edit
Program bug_reshape
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94578
--- Comment #1 from Jan-Willem Blokland ---
Below are the results of the test program. The results of array1d should have
been identical to array2d.
--- array2d ---
1 1 0.100E+01 0.100E+01 0.100E+01 0.100E+00
0.100
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: howisjw at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The other day, I tried to compile a large Fortran code using gcc 8.3.0. In the
code the reshape function is used and the resulting is
