[Bug c++/98216] [C++20] template mangling for double template argument is wrong

2021-10-14 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98216 hq.ks at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hq.ks at web dot de --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/102754] collisions in double constant template mangling for negative values

2021-10-14 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754 hq.ks at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102754] collisions in double constant template mangling for negative values

2021-10-14 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754 --- Comment #2 from hq.ks at web dot de --- Created attachment 51603 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51603&action=edit output

[Bug c++/102754] collisions in double constant template mangling for negative values

2021-10-14 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754 --- Comment #1 from hq.ks at web dot de --- Created attachment 51602 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51602&action=edit compile, grep object symbols

[Bug c++/102754] New: collisions in double constant template mangling for negative values

2021-10-14 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102754 Bug ID: 102754 Summary: collisions in double constant template mangling for negative values Product: gcc Version: 9.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/102694] New: no matching function for call when passing template-dependent template parameter to initialize literal class parameter

2021-10-11 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102694 Bug ID: 102694 Summary: no matching function for call when passing template-dependent template parameter to initialize literal class parameter Product: gcc Versi

[Bug c++/102693] ICE in tsubst related to lambdas as template default parameters

2021-10-11 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102693 hq.ks at web dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |9.4.0 --- Comment #1 from hq.ks at

[Bug c++/102693] New: ICE in tsubst related to lambdas as template default parameters

2021-10-11 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102693 Bug ID: 102693 Summary: ICE in tsubst related to lambdas as template default parameters Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/102680] lambda-expression in template-argument plus templateed using leads to further using-directive being ignored within template scope

2021-10-10 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680 --- Comment #2 from hq.ks at web dot de --- Ooops, terribly sorry, wanted to send that to someone else. On 10/10/2021 20.56, Philipp Klenze wrote: > https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Matrices > > On 10/10/2021 20.51, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.

[Bug c++/102680] lambda-expression in template-argument plus templateed using leads to further using-directive being ignored within template scope

2021-10-10 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680 --- Comment #1 from hq.ks at web dot de --- https://www.overleaf.com/learn/latex/Matrices On 10/10/2021 20.51, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > > Wh

[Bug c++/102680] New: lambda-expression in template-argument plus templateed using leads to further using-directive being ignored within template scope

2021-10-10 Thread hq.ks at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102680 Bug ID: 102680 Summary: lambda-expression in template-argument plus templateed using leads to further using-directive being ignored within template scope Product: gcc