[Bug c++/105307] -fmax-errors truncated for concept diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105307 --- Comment #3 from Igel --- well, quite surely, > error: 'x' is not a member of 'NoX' is not the only instance of this problem. It seems to me that gcc is not differentiating "normal errors" from "explanatory errors", and I guess introducing t

[Bug c++/92440] Error output for first error truncated with -fmax-errors=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92440 Igel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ich.freak at gmx dot net --- Comment #5 from Igel

[Bug c++/105307] New: -fmax-errors truncated for concept diagnostics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105307 Bug ID: 105307 Summary: -fmax-errors truncated for concept diagnostics Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/103540] diagnosting concept depends on itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103540 --- Comment #2 from Igel --- Ah thanks for copying the relevant code here. The error that you're referring to is: : In instantiation of 'struct X<0>': :5:14: required by substitution of 'template requires StrictNodeType using Int = int [wit

[Bug c++/103540] New: diagnosting concept depends on itself

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103540 Bug ID: 103540 Summary: diagnosting concept depends on itself Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/103239] New: confusing template argument deduction error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103239 Bug ID: 103239 Summary: confusing template argument deduction error message Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp