[Bug bootstrap/38667] gcc 4.3.2 build fails to create/link libgcc in SLES9 32-bit platform

2008-12-30 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #2 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-12-30 19:06 --- (In reply to comment #1) /opt/gcc/4.3.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lc you are likely missing the glibc-devel package. Hi, I have the glibc-devel installed, I verified it. host rpm -qa | grep

[Bug bootstrap/38667] gcc 4.3.2 build fails to create/link libgcc in SLES9 32-bit platform

2008-12-30 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #4 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-12-30 19:51 --- (In reply to comment #3) --libdir=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/${PLATFORM_LIBDIR} this adjusts the std search paths (as well as --prefix), so you need to put a libc there as well. You probably want to add

[Bug bootstrap/38667] gcc 4.3.2 build fails to create/link libgcc in SLES9 32-bit platform

2008-12-30 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #5 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-12-30 19:52 --- (In reply to comment #3) --libdir=${INSTALL_PREFIX}/${PLATFORM_LIBDIR} this adjusts the std search paths (as well as --prefix), so you need to put a libc there as well. You probably want to add

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-12-29 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #23 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-12-30 07:11 --- (In reply to comment #22) Can you still provide the preprocessed source? hi, I was able to solve this issue. this could be closed now. thanks Andrew for following up. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/38667] New: gcc 4.3.2 build fails to create/link libgcc in SLES9 32-bit platform

2008-12-29 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: imam dot toufique at intel dot com GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38667

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-07-02 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #20 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-02 16:17 --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #7) So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct? Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways? 2. -fPIC has always been

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-07-01 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #17 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-01 19:26 --- (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) I did: svn co http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/ gcc-4.3 I hope I got the correct copy there, unless I did some wrong

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-07-01 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #18 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-07-01 21:17 --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #16) (In reply to comment #15) I did: svn co http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch/ gcc-4.3 I hope I got the correct copy

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-27 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #15 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-27 08:57 --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) I just tried the 4.3_branch release of gcc with the CFFLAGS='-02 -fPIC' option. It seem to fail now in libiberty/md5.c Here is the error

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-26 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #11 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-26 15:58 --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) So, do you think I need to exclude all along '-fPIC' for the other platform specific builds of 4.3.1? I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-26 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #13 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-26 21:56 --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) I tried to compile latest 4.3.x SVN branch for i686-pc-linux-gnu with CFLAGS=-O2 -fPIC and it worked OK. Same with trunk SVN. How did you fetch

[Bug c/36622] New: 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: imam dot toufique at intel dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug c/36623] New: 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: imam dot toufique at intel dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug c/36624] New: 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: imam dot toufique at intel dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #5 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-24 23:46 --- (pardon me, I am pretty new for submitting bug reports at this site) From the previous note I just received, it looks like I should not be using fPIC option to compile gcc? is this applicable for both 32

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #7 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-25 01:13 --- (In reply to comment #6) So, you are suggesting that I should remove fPIC option, correct? Yes. Is there a reason why you have CFLAGS set anyways? Hi Andrew, I have the CFLAGS for 2 reasons: 1. I have

[Bug target/36622] 4.3.1 failed to compile gcse.c file.

2008-06-24 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #9 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2008-06-25 01:18 --- (In reply to comment #8) 1. I have the mpfr and gmp libs in non standard locations, so I want to make sure that the gcc install looks at the correct places. That is what --with-gmp=/--with-mpfr

[Bug bootstrap/34596] New: gcc 4.2.1 4.2.2 fails in configure-stage2-intel

2007-12-26 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: imam dot toufique at intel dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc

[Bug bootstrap/34596] gcc 4.2.1 4.2.2 fails in configure-stage2-intel

2007-12-26 Thread imam dot toufique at intel dot com
--- Comment #2 from imam dot toufique at intel dot com 2007-12-27 02:18 --- Hi, this is what the config.log says in the intl dir. /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference