https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
Javier Serrano Polo
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #15 from Javi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #14 from Javier Serrano Polo
---
(In reply to Adam Conrad from comment #13)
> Please stop speaking as if you speak for the Debian toolchain maintainers,
> or Debian as a whole. You don't.
I do not represent Debian, but I state fact
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #12 from Javier Serrano Polo
---
Created attachment 43357
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43357&action=edit
Initial support for multiarch interpreters
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> If you intend t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #10 from Javier Serrano Polo
---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #9)
> Not a bug. The appropriate time to raise such an issue is if in future
> there is otherwise consensus to have a major libc ABI break and move to
> libc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
Javier Serrano Polo
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|IN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #6 from Javier Serrano Polo ---
> As long as the new behavior is optional (not the default), the patch stands a
> chance of being accepted.
Thank you. I will change the status of the report if you do not mind.
> the discussion about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
--- Comment #3 from Javier Serrano Polo ---
Upstream wants to make multiarch harder; the patch will not be posted here.
Nevertheless, Adam, please answer to my previous question.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84173
Javier Serrano Polo
changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adconrad at 0c3 dot net
--- Comme
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: javier--1JjCLmwH3DOs1h35RYKsyJrkQzDNHN at jasp dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Preferred multiarch names refer to the /lib directory and are unique, e.g.
/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. Please consider accepting a future patch that
